Author Topic: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"  (Read 20530 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Bread

  • We Gave You Bruce
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 7867
  • I've distressing news.
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #200 on: December 16, 2014, 12:08:52 PM »
It is pretty disappointing that the majority of Americans are awful people.

The majority of humans are awful people. 
My prescience is fully engorged.  It throbs with righteous accuracy.  I am sated.

Offline Mr Bread

  • We Gave You Bruce
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 7867
  • I've distressing news.
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #201 on: December 16, 2014, 12:12:24 PM »
So the #prolapse thing was about force feeding people on hunger strike. I thought that ramming a tube up someone's ass to torture was a little too perverted, even for the cia.


The second dumbest thing about all of this is the great lengths the cia went to redefine the word torture. Guess what, we've been torturing our enemies since day one and will continue to do it until they're all dead.

The first dumbest thing is leftists being okay with killing someone by hell fire missile, but not okay with water boarding because Obama not cheney.

I am interested to learn how force feeding someone makes their bad person fall out of itself.  I mean surely they didn't try force feeding them through their bad person right?
My prescience is fully engorged.  It throbs with righteous accuracy.  I am sated.

Offline Mr Bread

  • We Gave You Bruce
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 7867
  • I've distressing news.
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #202 on: December 16, 2014, 12:14:07 PM »
I think the majority of people still have the ability to put themselves in a theoretical position in which they themselves would 'torture' another person to save someone they care about.

I think a majority of people would also murder a unicorn to save someone they care about.

I definitely would. 
My prescience is fully engorged.  It throbs with righteous accuracy.  I am sated.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38078
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #203 on: December 16, 2014, 12:22:00 PM »
So the #prolapse thing was about force feeding people on hunger strike. I thought that ramming a tube up someone's ass to torture was a little too perverted, even for the cia.


The second dumbest thing about all of this is the great lengths the cia went to redefine the word torture. Guess what, we've been torturing our enemies since day one and will continue to do it until they're all dead.

The first dumbest thing is leftists being okay with killing someone by hell fire missile, but not okay with water boarding because Obama not cheney.

I am interested to learn how force feeding someone makes their bad person fall out of itself.  I mean surely they didn't try force feeding them through their bad person right?

How are you going to water board someone with a tube in the mouth?  How do you IV someone if you are restricting blood flow?  Ass it is!

Offline Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29366
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
simple mix-up in the administration of bee pollen

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7833
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #205 on: December 16, 2014, 12:58:58 PM »
I think the majority of people still have the ability to put themselves in a theoretical position in which they themselves would 'torture' another person to save someone they care about.

I think a majority of people would also murder a unicorn to save someone they care about.

I definitely would.

Yes, pretty easy choice.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38007
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #206 on: December 16, 2014, 01:21:16 PM »
I think the majority of people still have the ability to put themselves in a theoretical position in which they themselves would 'torture' another person to save someone they care about.

That seems like a terrible way to determine which government policy to promote.

This was in reference to the majority of Americans supporting enhanced interrogation and the hypocrisy of some. They would rush use the same techniques to save someone they personally care for, but vilify those that use it to save people they don't even know.

That's not hypocritical at all.

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7833
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #207 on: December 16, 2014, 02:11:36 PM »
I think the majority of people still have the ability to put themselves in a theoretical position in which they themselves would 'torture' another person to save someone they care about.

That seems like a terrible way to determine which government policy to promote.

This was in reference to the majority of Americans supporting enhanced interrogation and the hypocrisy of some. They would rush use the same techniques to save someone they personally care for, but vilify those that use it to save people they don't even know.

That's not hypocritical at all.

OK

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38007
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #208 on: December 16, 2014, 02:18:39 PM »
If somebody I loved associated themselves with terrorists, I wouldn't want them water boarded, either.

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7833
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #209 on: December 16, 2014, 02:23:28 PM »
If somebody I loved associated themselves with terrorists, I wouldn't want them water boarded, either.

 :facepalm:

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #210 on: December 16, 2014, 08:20:09 PM »
It is pretty disappointing that the majority of Americans are awful people.

The majority of humans are awful people.

Ergo, Obama's reelection
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55959
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #211 on: December 17, 2014, 05:25:10 PM »
26 people held in error

Quote
Mr. Bashmilah has told them of being tortured in Jordan before he was handed over to the C.I.A., which at times kept him shackled alone in freezing-cold cells in Afghanistan, subjected to loud music 24 hours a day. He attempted suicide at least three times, once by saving pills and swallowing them all at once; once by slashing his wrists; and once by trying to hang himself. Another time he cut himself and used his own blood to write “this is unjust” on the wall.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/13/us/politics/amid-details-on-torture-data-on-26-held-in-error-.html

:frown:

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #212 on: December 17, 2014, 06:18:27 PM »
Should have just blown them up instead
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40534
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #213 on: December 19, 2014, 09:21:13 AM »
using 9/11 as an excuse to torture brown people 13 years later is pretty LOL

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55959
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #214 on: December 19, 2014, 10:16:00 AM »
So, can someone document the reform that has taken place since these torture cases?

Any significant evidence that the current administration has reigned in the CIA (or other agencies)?



not as far as I know, because the CIA has everyone by the balls and really needs to be disbanded.

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22786
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #215 on: December 19, 2014, 10:57:34 AM »
using 9/11 as an excuse to torture brown people 13 years later is pretty LOL
The 9/11 AUMF is also the legal rationale we're using to fight a war in Syria and Iraq too!  9/11 is really the gift that keeps on giving to the US executive branch.


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline bubbles4ksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5488
  • Son of Pete
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #216 on: December 21, 2014, 01:41:10 PM »


interview with one of the interrogation contractors. there is a lot of interesting stuff in here. 25 minutes long.

http://www.dancarlin.com/common-sense-home-landing-page/

show 285 - torturing our values. this guy's contextual understanding and objectivity is fantastic. i want every single american to listen to the first 40 minutes of this podcast. i'm certain that all of you, from libliblibliblibliblib to sonofdaxjones, will find this worthwhile. please listen.


@8manpick @Dlew12

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55959
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Watched the video, eff that guy. He's just out for revenge. He could have took a stand against torture and chose not to.

Offline bubbles4ksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5488
  • Son of Pete
    • View Profile
Watched the video, eff that guy. He's just out for revenge. He could have took a stand against torture and chose not to.
he seems totally comfortable with having acted out of revenge. it's scary to think that someone hired him knowing he was capable of that degree of rationalization.

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22786
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #219 on: December 21, 2014, 08:00:43 PM »
Yeah.  Dan crushed it as usual.  Love his discussion on idealism vs. realism.

And that Vice interview is pretty good.


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline Benja

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6365
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #220 on: December 22, 2014, 02:34:52 PM »
Well shoot, the huge firestorm the media has attempted to create over the latest "torture" report just doesn't seem to be materializing.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/12/15/that-big-cia-torture-report-americans-just-shrugged/

Quote
A new poll from the Pew Research Center is the first to gauge reactions to last week's big CIA report on "enhanced interrogation techniques" -- what agency critics call torture.
 
And the reaction is pretty muted.
 
The poll shows people says 51-29 percent than the CIA's methods were justified and 56-28 percent that the information gleaned helped prevent terror attacks.

The word "torture," it should be noted, isn't mentioned in the poll, but it has been associated with much of the coverage of the issue. And the numbers align nicely with polls on the use of torture, which shows that relatively few Americans are concerned about it -- especially when you bring the prospect of combating terrorism into the mix.
 
That lack of real concern about what the CIA was doing is also reflected in the amount of interest in the story. While newspapers and broadcast news across the country devoted a huge amount of coverage to the Senate intelligence committee report last week, just 23 percent of Americans say they are following the story "very closely," while 50 percent are following it "not too closely" or "not at all." That ranks it behind the Ferguson/Eric Garner protests and stories about the U.S. economy.
 
And it's not just that people who aren't concerned about torture aren't tuning in. Those who have followed the story the most, in fact, approve of the program 59-34 percent.
 
Even Democrats are pretty split on the justification for the program. While 37 percent say it was justified, 46 percent say it wasn't. Liberal Democrats disapprove 65-25 percent, but moderate and conservative Democrats approve 48-32 percent.
 
Given the images that were conjured by the report -- "rectal feeding," etc. -- that's not much of a reaction. Indeed, this is not the kind of public outcry that demands big changes to how the CIA conducts business.
 
And Democrats who pushed for the release of the report in hopes of changing how the CIA does business have to be frustrated.

I think that pool mostly reflects how unsurprised most Americans were by the torture report. I mean after 9/11 and the vigor that followed anyone with brains assumed that was probably going on.

Offline Benja

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6365
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #221 on: December 22, 2014, 02:36:45 PM »
It is pretty disappointing that the majority of Americans are awful people.

The majority of humans are awful people. 

Naw

Offline Mr Bread

  • We Gave You Bruce
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 7867
  • I've distressing news.
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #222 on: December 22, 2014, 04:37:14 PM »
It is pretty disappointing that the majority of Americans are awful people.

The majority of humans are awful people. 

Naw

Of course they are.  They just lie to themselves and others about it. 
My prescience is fully engorged.  It throbs with righteous accuracy.  I am sated.

Online nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 17051
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #223 on: December 22, 2014, 05:09:55 PM »
It is pretty disappointing that the majority of Americans are awful people.

The majority of humans are awful people. 

Naw

Of course they are.  They just lie to themselves and others about it.

Most people are pretty good.
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline bubbles4ksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5488
  • Son of Pete
    • View Profile
Re: “The question would be how much you could read before they grabbed you"
« Reply #224 on: December 22, 2014, 05:27:14 PM »
It is pretty disappointing that the majority of Americans are awful people.

The majority of humans are awful people. 

Naw

Of course they are.  They just lie to themselves and others about it.

Most people are pretty good.
yeah but if you scare them they'll behave like any other animal.