Author Topic: Nebraska's struggle for relevance.  (Read 302690 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19425
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: Nebraska's struggle for relevance.
« Reply #1800 on: November 09, 2021, 02:43:37 PM »
Does anyone have that chart that moves 1 tick mark up for every win over the years, where we could compare it to K-State at this point?

P5 Wins and Losses

Offline Winters

  • The King of Real Zeal
  • Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *********
  • Posts: 16037
    • View Profile
Re: Nebraska's struggle for relevance.
« Reply #1801 on: November 09, 2021, 02:48:44 PM »
We should make flyers with this and cover the state of Nebraska with them.  How the mighty have fallen!

https://twitter.com/KellisRobinett/status/1458155367767191558?s=20
I want to snort this tweet.
Best #heel and/or #babyface on this blogsite



If it were up to me, Wintz would be on a fan scholarship, full ride.

Offline WildcatNkilt

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6929
  • Had the worst birthday ever on Dec. 5th of '98.
    • View Profile
Re: Nebraska's struggle for relevance.
« Reply #1802 on: November 09, 2021, 02:54:11 PM »
Holy crap I never thought about that.  Nebraska hasn't been to a bowl since 2016. 
Kansas City Blue Barbecue fan.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37086
    • View Profile
Re: Nebraska's struggle for relevance.
« Reply #1803 on: November 09, 2021, 02:58:15 PM »
Holy crap I never thought about that.  Nebraska hasn't been to a bowl since 2016.

I can't even imagine being that awful at football.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63985
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Nebraska's struggle for relevance.
« Reply #1804 on: November 09, 2021, 06:28:27 PM »
Oh wow. Didn't they go to like 30 or 40 straight?
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39131
    • View Profile
Re: Nebraska's struggle for relevance.
« Reply #1805 on: November 09, 2021, 07:00:43 PM »
Does anyone have that chart that moves 1 tick mark up for every win over the years, where we could compare it to K-State at this point?

P5 Wins and Losses

The Rhoades era was so much fun

Offline KST8FAN

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2911
    • View Profile
Re: Nebraska's struggle for relevance.
« Reply #1806 on: November 09, 2021, 09:17:35 PM »
Have they still not won an NCAA tournament game too?  Tonight's loss won't help their seed.  Go Leathernecks.


Tom

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk


Offline PurpleOil

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1950
  • Make it rain
    • View Profile
Re: Nebraska's struggle for relevance.
« Reply #1807 on: November 10, 2021, 12:26:44 PM »
Does anyone have that chart that moves 1 tick mark up for every win over the years, where we could compare it to K-State at this point?

P5 Wins and Losses


Yes!!! Thank you!


Also, my god KU

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21340
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: Nebraska's struggle for relevance.
« Reply #1808 on: November 10, 2021, 01:06:12 PM »
Ok ok, but which slope would be more fun to ski? That's the real question in realignment talks.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63985
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Nebraska's struggle for relevance.
« Reply #1809 on: November 10, 2021, 01:13:01 PM »
As far as skiing goes, pelini seems to be the frontrunner
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39131
    • View Profile
Re: Nebraska's struggle for relevance.
« Reply #1810 on: November 10, 2021, 01:46:41 PM »
you could get some sick vert skiing Solich (in reverse)

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85311
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Nebraska's struggle for relevance.
« Reply #1811 on: November 10, 2021, 02:00:05 PM »
you could get some sick vert skiing Solich (in reverse)
No, the Mangino line is takeoff

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53771
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Nebraska's struggle for relevance.
« Reply #1812 on: November 10, 2021, 02:04:27 PM »
Fred Hoiberg and Scott Frost are basically the football and basketball equivalents of each other in so many ways

cracks me up

Offline cfbandyman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9339
  • To da 'ville.
    • View Profile
Re: Nebraska's struggle for relevance.
« Reply #1813 on: November 10, 2021, 02:54:38 PM »
That ku line was basically only arrested by Mangino, just incredible
A&M Style: 1/19/13 Co-Champion of THE ED's College Basketball Challenge

The art of the deal with it poors

OG Elon hater with a tesla


Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85311
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Nebraska's struggle for relevance.
« Reply #1814 on: November 10, 2021, 03:38:39 PM »
Fred Hoiberg and Scott Frost are basically the football and basketball equivalents of each other in so many ways

cracks me up

yes, it's wild.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17576
    • View Profile
Re: Nebraska's struggle for relevance.
« Reply #1815 on: November 10, 2021, 04:33:32 PM »
It's incredible that Paul Rhodes won (didn't lose?) at a high enough clip for KU, with a 20ish game lead, to surpass him in futility pretty quickly.

It's still incredible that Chizik's stint got him the Auburn job and a National Title.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39131
    • View Profile
Re: Nebraska's struggle for relevance.
« Reply #1816 on: November 10, 2021, 04:43:06 PM »
i am irl proud of our commitment to mediocrity. it gives us a chance to have a 2012 every once in a while!
and if you are a coach you only get two losing seasons and then we can your ass (2004/2005, 2007/2008, 2015/2018). it's very reasonable imo.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53771
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Nebraska's struggle for relevance.
« Reply #1817 on: November 11, 2021, 11:02:21 AM »
i am irl proud of our commitment to mediocrity. it gives us a chance to have a 2012 every once in a while!
and if you are a coach you only get two losing seasons and then we can your ass (2004/2005, 2007/2008, 2015/2018). it's very reasonable imo.


Look at Okie State!

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39131
    • View Profile
Re: Nebraska's struggle for relevance.
« Reply #1818 on: November 11, 2021, 11:05:32 AM »
@Chingon add OKst to your chart!

Offline PurpleOil

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1950
  • Make it rain
    • View Profile
Re: Nebraska's struggle for relevance.
« Reply #1819 on: November 11, 2021, 11:11:32 AM »
i am irl proud of our commitment to mediocrity. it gives us a chance to have a 2012 every once in a while!
and if you are a coach you only get two losing seasons and then we can your ass (2004/2005, 2007/2008, 2015/2018). it's very reasonable imo.


Look at Okie State!

I'd take OSU's program over ours over the last 10 years. Both have a conference championship, but they've had more overall wins and been ranked higher and more often than us.

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19425
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: Nebraska's struggle for relevance.
« Reply #1820 on: November 11, 2021, 11:20:58 AM »

Offline Shooter Jones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5634
    • View Profile
Re: Nebraska's struggle for relevance.
« Reply #1821 on: November 11, 2021, 11:47:27 AM »
i am irl proud of our commitment to mediocrity. it gives us a chance to have a 2012 every once in a while!
and if you are a coach you only get two losing seasons and then we can your ass (2004/2005, 2007/2008, 2015/2018). it's very reasonable imo.


Look at Okie State!

I'd take OSU's program over ours over the last 10 years. Both have a conference championship, but they've had more overall wins and been ranked higher and more often than us.

Yeah, and I think most people nationally view OSU as slightly above K-State... and usually have them in a tier above K-State in those silly college football tier graphics they put out.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39131
    • View Profile
Re: Nebraska's struggle for relevance.
« Reply #1822 on: November 11, 2021, 12:02:32 PM »
that loss to iowa state in 2011 was devastating on like 4 different levels. and now we can see that OSU had a chance to get back to .500 (since 1996) if they would have won that game

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44880
    • View Profile
Re: Nebraska's struggle for relevance.
« Reply #1823 on: November 11, 2021, 12:34:38 PM »
It's incredible that Paul Rhodes won (didn't lose?) at a high enough clip for KU, with a 20ish game lead, to surpass him in futility pretty quickly.

It's still incredible that Chizik's stint got him the Auburn job and a National Title.

He got that:job because of his DC tenure at auburn, they rightly completely ignored what he did at Iowa State because at the time they were a dog crap, toilet bowl who gave zero resources to their football program. Absolutely a worst program than KU at the time.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44880
    • View Profile
Re: Nebraska's struggle for relevance.
« Reply #1824 on: November 11, 2021, 12:42:23 PM »
i am irl proud of our commitment to mediocrity. it gives us a chance to have a 2012 every once in a while!
and if you are a coach you only get two losing seasons and then we can your ass (2004/2005, 2007/2008, 2015/2018). it's very reasonable imo.


Look at Okie State!

I'd take OSU's program over ours over the last 10 years. Both have a conference championship, but they've had more overall wins and been ranked higher and more often than us.

K-State & Oklahoma State, given the scope of college football, are the exact same program. We're a 7-8 win program, they are an 8-9 win program that absolutely cannot beat their most hated rival. They have fans that are just as frustrated and jaded about their program as you are. They have a 6 game losing streak to OU. We're beaten OU 4 times in 10 years. They've beaten them 4 times in 20.

Gundy has absolutely been solid, but nothing to the point where we should be aspiring to be like them.