Author Topic: Voter ID  (Read 35247 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67445
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Voter ID
« Reply #150 on: October 23, 2014, 12:40:37 PM »
Quote
Avatar
Pete  Hyacinth
2 days ago
We need the name for the perp.

We have a good picture of him. someone knows him.

With facial recognition software he could be found, if all his cohorts in crime are silent.

Deploy enough cameras back up by facial recognition software and this guy will not even be able to shop at Walmart.

Hey cars have dash cams for insurance purposes. if they were connected of periodically downloaded, you could do what the government does or refuses to do.

Pete is the best
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Voter ID
« Reply #151 on: October 23, 2014, 10:33:39 PM »
Give them a new Obama phone and they will vote.  Voter apathy is a bigger hurdle to overcome.  I am not real fond of having to show an ID, but its the law --so live with it.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Voter ID
« Reply #152 on: October 24, 2014, 11:42:23 AM »
To get a drivers license / ID in Illinois, my passport, KS drivers license, 2 bills showing Chicago address,  pay stub, and most recent two years w-2's showing SS# were not enough. Since I didn't have my original social security card, they turned me away. They are only open M-F 8-5. I can see how obtaining an ID could be difficult for people without flexible jobs.
:adios:

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Voter ID
« Reply #153 on: October 24, 2014, 12:15:15 PM »
But shouldn't they want their (poor, disenfranchised) base to have easier access to valid ID and all that?
:adios:

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Voter ID
« Reply #154 on: October 24, 2014, 12:16:08 PM »
Or maybe they are trying to make it more difficult for people with jobs (conservatives) to get IDs? Just spitballing here...
:adios:

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Voter ID
« Reply #155 on: October 24, 2014, 12:17:18 PM »
Writing these from the social security office, where I've been for over an hour.
:adios:

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Voter ID
« Reply #156 on: October 24, 2014, 12:19:56 PM »
I dunno, but I'd agree that this sounds like more of a problem cause by a bloated, unwieldy, and nonsensical liberal bureaucracy than an attempt discriminate against minorities. Maybe try pretending that you only speak spanish and see if that helps? Also, does IL require an ID to vote?
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Voter ID
« Reply #157 on: October 24, 2014, 12:23:17 PM »
I dunno, but I'd agree that this sounds like more of a problem cause by a bloated, unwieldy, and nonsensical liberal bureaucracy than an attempt discriminate against minorities. Maybe try pretending that you only speak spanish and see if that helps? Also, does IL require an ID to vote?
All I know is it sucks and is a pain in the ass. Is it too late to get an absentee ballot for Kansas? Maybe I'll just vote there. Not sure on Illinois voter ID, but I doubt it.
:adios:

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Voter ID
« Reply #158 on: October 24, 2014, 04:36:20 PM »
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/10/24/could-non-citizens-decide-the-november-election/

Quote
Could control of the Senate in 2014 be decided by illegal votes cast by non-citizens? Some argue that incidents of voting by non-citizens are so rare as to be inconsequential, with efforts to block fraud a screen for an agenda to prevent poor and minority voters from exercising the franchise, while others define such incidents as a threat to democracy itself. Both sides depend more heavily on anecdotes than data.
 
In a forthcoming article in the journal Electoral Studies, we bring real data from big social science survey datasets to bear on the question of whether, to what extent, and for whom non-citizens vote in U.S. elections. Most non-citizens do not register, let alone vote. But enough do that their participation can change the outcome of close races.
 
Our data comes from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES). Its large number of observations (32,800 in 2008 and 55,400 in 2010) provide sufficient samples of the non-immigrant sub-population, with 339 non-citizen respondents in 2008 and 489 in 2010. For the 2008 CCES, we also attempted to match respondents to voter files so that we could verify whether they actually voted.
 
How many non-citizens participate in U.S. elections? More than 14 percent of non-citizens in both the 2008 and 2010 samples indicated that they were registered to vote. Furthermore, some of these non-citizens voted. Our best guess, based upon extrapolations from the portion of the sample with a verified vote, is that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008 and 2.2 percent of non-citizens voted in 2010.
 
Because non-citizens tended to favor Democrats (Obama won more than 80 percent of the votes of non-citizens in the 2008 CCES sample), we find that this participation was large enough to plausibly account for Democratic victories in a few close elections.
Non-citizen votes could have given Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote needed to overcome filibusters in order to pass health-care reform and other Obama administration priorities in the 111th Congress. Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) won election in 2008 with a victory margin of 312 votes. Votes cast by just 0.65 percent of Minnesota non-citizens could account for this margin. It is also possible that non-citizen votes were responsible for Obama’s 2008 victory in North Carolina. Obama won the state by 14,177 votes, so a turnout by 5.1 percent of North Carolina’s adult non-citizens would have provided this victory margin.
Advertisement

We also find that one of the favorite policies advocated by conservatives to prevent voter fraud appears strikingly ineffective. Nearly three quarters of the non-citizens who indicated they were asked to provide photo identification at the polls claimed to have subsequently voted.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67445
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Voter ID
« Reply #159 on: October 24, 2014, 04:43:41 PM »
A lot of assumption in that

That last sentence is pretty  :lol: tho
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Voter ID
« Reply #160 on: October 24, 2014, 04:52:57 PM »
A lot of assumption in that

That last sentence is pretty  :lol: tho

Voter ID is not geared at stopping illegal aliens from voting - it is aimed at stopping people from casting votes for other registered voters. You register first, then you have to prove you are the registered voter you say you are at the polls. Obviously, it appears we also have a problem with registering illegal voters...
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67445
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Voter ID
« Reply #161 on: October 24, 2014, 05:14:39 PM »
I would agree those are all problems
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Voter ID
« Reply #162 on: October 30, 2014, 10:09:08 PM »


 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

That was a lot of effort to perpetuate a myth. These are the people that should be finding the loch Ness monster and bigfoot
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Voter ID
« Reply #163 on: November 01, 2014, 10:16:43 AM »
I thought we've made it abundantly clear that "voter fraud is a myth" is a myth, a tag line pushed by people who were cheating and wanted to continue cheating.

Do people still deny that voter fraud exists? I thought the debate was about what level of fraud is tolerable (none imho)?
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Voter ID
« Reply #164 on: November 02, 2014, 04:11:53 PM »
Another case of confirmed voter fraud in NM. Could have been prevented by voter ID. Who can say how many illegal votes aren't being caught?

http://www.kob.com/article/stories/S3607682.shtml#.VFaqjXi9LTp
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7833
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Voter ID
« Reply #165 on: November 03, 2014, 03:16:47 PM »
And more of the same

Quote
North Carolina election officials repeatedly offered ballots last week to an impostor who arrived at polling places with the names and addresses of 'inactive' voters who hadn't participated in elections for many years.

No fraudulent votes were actually cast: It was the latest undercover video sting from conservative activist James O'Keefe, whose filmmaking résumé reads like a target list of liberal causes.

He famously shuttered ACORN, the community organizing outfit once linked to Barack Obama. He dressed in an Osama bin Laden costume and waded across the Rio Grande from Mexico to America as a show of disdain for U.S. border policy. He videotaped people admitting they sold taxpayer-provided cellphones for drugs, shoes, handbags and spending cash.

Now O'Keefe has strolled into more than 20 voting precincts in Raleigh, Durham and Greensboro, N.C., proffering the names of people who seldom vote in order to test the integrity of the election process. It seems to have failed on a massive scale.

'I just sign this and then I can vote?' he asked one poll worker. 'Yep,' came the reply.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2818443/James-O-Keefe-s-video-shows-North-Carolina-poll-workers-offering-ballots.html#ixzz3I2gsrWlU
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Online Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: Voter ID
« Reply #166 on: November 03, 2014, 04:52:28 PM »
How is O'Keefe not in jail?

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7833
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Voter ID
« Reply #167 on: November 03, 2014, 04:54:23 PM »
How is O'Keefe not in jail?

He didn't actually vote, unlike the others.

Online Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: Voter ID
« Reply #168 on: November 03, 2014, 05:00:22 PM »
How is O'Keefe not in jail?

He didn't actually vote, unlike the others.

He collected the ballots, though. What if those inactive voters were to actually show up for that election?

Offline Fedor

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1613
    • View Profile
Re: Voter ID
« Reply #169 on: November 04, 2014, 09:14:41 AM »
I was not in the system despite voting for the last several years.  I had to fill out a provisional ballot.  Also, there were no doughnuts.  Being disenfranchised really sucks guys.
I was wrong and I apologize. - michigancat 8/22/14

Offline Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29366
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: Voter ID
« Reply #170 on: November 04, 2014, 09:18:36 AM »
how many provisional ballots did you fill out?  like twenty? :pray:

Online Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: Voter ID
« Reply #171 on: November 04, 2014, 09:22:07 AM »
I was not in the system despite voting for the last several years.  I had to fill out a provisional ballot.  Also, there were no doughnuts.  Being disenfranchised really sucks guys.

Sounds like voter fraud to me. I would tell Kobach about it.

http://www.kssos.org/elections/voterfraud/default.aspx

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38079
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Voter ID
« Reply #172 on: November 04, 2014, 09:53:55 AM »
I was not in the system despite voting for the last several years.  I had to fill out a provisional ballot.  Also, there were no doughnuts.  Being disenfranchised really sucks guys.

CNSDad had same experience.  Has lived and voted from his current address for just short of a decade.  Was in the system for the primaries,  but not today's general election.   

Offline _33

  • The Inventor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10540
    • View Profile
Re: Voter ID
« Reply #173 on: November 04, 2014, 11:09:51 AM »
hmmmm...sounds like something fishy is going on.

Offline slucat

  • GIRL ALERT, GIRL ALERT
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 706
  • This SLU, not the city
    • View Profile
Re: Voter ID
« Reply #174 on: November 04, 2014, 11:25:35 AM »
apparently lots of polling places in the capitol city (of KS) -more dem leaning than most areas of KS, are experiencing long waits and problems with electronic voting systems.

fishy?