0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
If the federal government doesn't decide, who will??? -shitbrain libtards
Quote from: Mr Bread on November 19, 2014, 12:27:59 PMQuote from: john "teach me how to" dougie on November 19, 2014, 11:55:08 AMQuote from: Mr Bread on November 19, 2014, 10:56:33 AMQuote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 18, 2014, 07:08:24 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on November 18, 2014, 03:06:10 PMFeeding kids healthy food in reasonable proportions seems like a pretty good idea to me.They're treating children like livestock. Some kids need to eat more than others. The younger the kid the worse the preset meal plan because of how fast the kids grow and how widely they vary in size. This is especially problematic in head start funded pre schools where many of the kids aren't fed at home and need more food.The fact that an obese Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) championed these rules only makes the whole thing less appetizing and harder to swallow. I can't think of anything more elitist, obtuse and idiotic than standardizing nutritional requirements for children.Who decides how much any particular child gets? It's all right in here. You may be too lazy to "pit".Listen you shitbrain dumbfuck, fsd here is against the rules championed by the obese Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!), so if they don't dictate how much a particular child eats then who or what does? The children? Lunch ladies? School administrators? If you scrap the rules then who makes the call and based on what criteria?It's a completely unnecessary intrusion that has already cost $3 billion dollars in additional subsidies and administrative costs over the last 3 years. The people that were making the local decisions on portions were doing a fine job. The problems are at home, not in the schools.
Quote from: john "teach me how to" dougie on November 19, 2014, 11:55:08 AMQuote from: Mr Bread on November 19, 2014, 10:56:33 AMQuote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 18, 2014, 07:08:24 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on November 18, 2014, 03:06:10 PMFeeding kids healthy food in reasonable proportions seems like a pretty good idea to me.They're treating children like livestock. Some kids need to eat more than others. The younger the kid the worse the preset meal plan because of how fast the kids grow and how widely they vary in size. This is especially problematic in head start funded pre schools where many of the kids aren't fed at home and need more food.The fact that an obese Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) championed these rules only makes the whole thing less appetizing and harder to swallow. I can't think of anything more elitist, obtuse and idiotic than standardizing nutritional requirements for children.Who decides how much any particular child gets? It's all right in here. You may be too lazy to "pit".Listen you shitbrain dumbfuck, fsd here is against the rules championed by the obese Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!), so if they don't dictate how much a particular child eats then who or what does? The children? Lunch ladies? School administrators? If you scrap the rules then who makes the call and based on what criteria?
Quote from: Mr Bread on November 19, 2014, 10:56:33 AMQuote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 18, 2014, 07:08:24 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on November 18, 2014, 03:06:10 PMFeeding kids healthy food in reasonable proportions seems like a pretty good idea to me.They're treating children like livestock. Some kids need to eat more than others. The younger the kid the worse the preset meal plan because of how fast the kids grow and how widely they vary in size. This is especially problematic in head start funded pre schools where many of the kids aren't fed at home and need more food.The fact that an obese Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) championed these rules only makes the whole thing less appetizing and harder to swallow. I can't think of anything more elitist, obtuse and idiotic than standardizing nutritional requirements for children.Who decides how much any particular child gets? It's all right in here. You may be too lazy to "pit".
Quote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 18, 2014, 07:08:24 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on November 18, 2014, 03:06:10 PMFeeding kids healthy food in reasonable proportions seems like a pretty good idea to me.They're treating children like livestock. Some kids need to eat more than others. The younger the kid the worse the preset meal plan because of how fast the kids grow and how widely they vary in size. This is especially problematic in head start funded pre schools where many of the kids aren't fed at home and need more food.The fact that an obese Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) championed these rules only makes the whole thing less appetizing and harder to swallow. I can't think of anything more elitist, obtuse and idiotic than standardizing nutritional requirements for children.Who decides how much any particular child gets?
Quote from: Rage Against the McKee on November 18, 2014, 03:06:10 PMFeeding kids healthy food in reasonable proportions seems like a pretty good idea to me.They're treating children like livestock. Some kids need to eat more than others. The younger the kid the worse the preset meal plan because of how fast the kids grow and how widely they vary in size. This is especially problematic in head start funded pre schools where many of the kids aren't fed at home and need more food.The fact that an obese Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) championed these rules only makes the whole thing less appetizing and harder to swallow. I can't think of anything more elitist, obtuse and idiotic than standardizing nutritional requirements for children.
Feeding kids healthy food in reasonable proportions seems like a pretty good idea to me.
Quote from: john "teach me how to" dougie on November 19, 2014, 12:57:45 PMQuote from: Mr Bread on November 19, 2014, 12:27:59 PMQuote from: john "teach me how to" dougie on November 19, 2014, 11:55:08 AMQuote from: Mr Bread on November 19, 2014, 10:56:33 AMQuote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 18, 2014, 07:08:24 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on November 18, 2014, 03:06:10 PMFeeding kids healthy food in reasonable proportions seems like a pretty good idea to me.They're treating children like livestock. Some kids need to eat more than others. The younger the kid the worse the preset meal plan because of how fast the kids grow and how widely they vary in size. This is especially problematic in head start funded pre schools where many of the kids aren't fed at home and need more food.The fact that an obese Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) championed these rules only makes the whole thing less appetizing and harder to swallow. I can't think of anything more elitist, obtuse and idiotic than standardizing nutritional requirements for children.Who decides how much any particular child gets? It's all right in here. You may be too lazy to "pit".Listen you shitbrain dumbfuck, fsd here is against the rules championed by the obese Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!), so if they don't dictate how much a particular child eats then who or what does? The children? Lunch ladies? School administrators? If you scrap the rules then who makes the call and based on what criteria?It's a completely unnecessary intrusion that has already cost $3 billion dollars in additional subsidies and administrative costs over the last 3 years. The people that were making the local decisions on portions were doing a fine job. The problems are at home, not in the schools.credible link?
Quote from: MakeItRain on November 20, 2014, 08:15:36 AMQuote from: john "teach me how to" dougie on November 19, 2014, 12:57:45 PMQuote from: Mr Bread on November 19, 2014, 12:27:59 PMQuote from: john "teach me how to" dougie on November 19, 2014, 11:55:08 AMQuote from: Mr Bread on November 19, 2014, 10:56:33 AMQuote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 18, 2014, 07:08:24 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on November 18, 2014, 03:06:10 PMFeeding kids healthy food in reasonable proportions seems like a pretty good idea to me.They're treating children like livestock. Some kids need to eat more than others. The younger the kid the worse the preset meal plan because of how fast the kids grow and how widely they vary in size. This is especially problematic in head start funded pre schools where many of the kids aren't fed at home and need more food.The fact that an obese Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) championed these rules only makes the whole thing less appetizing and harder to swallow. I can't think of anything more elitist, obtuse and idiotic than standardizing nutritional requirements for children.Who decides how much any particular child gets? It's all right in here. You may be too lazy to "pit".Listen you shitbrain dumbfuck, fsd here is against the rules championed by the obese Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!), so if they don't dictate how much a particular child eats then who or what does? The children? Lunch ladies? School administrators? If you scrap the rules then who makes the call and based on what criteria?It's a completely unnecessary intrusion that has already cost $3 billion dollars in additional subsidies and administrative costs over the last 3 years. The people that were making the local decisions on portions were doing a fine job. The problems are at home, not in the schools.credible link?The link above is the actual bill. Its all in there.
