Author Topic: Are we talking about this?  (Read 18485 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Katpappy

  • I got my eye on you
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13335
  • Party on gE
    • View Profile
Re: Are we talking about this?
« Reply #150 on: August 08, 2014, 01:53:57 PM »
That Thursday night national tv game vs. Auburn is a great opportunity for Bill to rage against the machine.

Maybe refuse to play and cart some desks out to the 50-yard line and hold a 3-hour study hall.

this.  or, he could donate his game check to the Auburn endowment.
Denined, he'll just write a letter to their best player, and tell him "better luck next time.".  :Carl:
Hot time in Kat town tonight.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45938
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: Are we talking about this?
« Reply #151 on: August 08, 2014, 02:11:42 PM »
Snyder had a way better resume than Prince when hired by KSU, but I'd certainly hate for that to be the test...   :flush:

That's just not accurate at all. The only difference in their resumes is that Prince didn't coach swimming and Snyder was a coordinator longer.

you don't honestly believe this do you? i mean, iowa won two big 10 championships with snyder as an offense coordinator.

Yes, I believe that most coordinators who get hired as head coaches don't generally get that chance after 9 years at one school. This isn't a terribly controversial stance :dunno: I didn't say anything about the legacy of Snyder's time at Iowa.

If you want to have a conversation about what you posted we can do that too. If you want to give Snyder credit for Iowa's conference titles, that's fine with me. I will say that would be moving the goal posts on how we view coordinators though, I don't seem to remember too many Dana Dimel appreciation threads nor too many BCS schools offering him a head coaching position.

i mean i suppose we could also talk about the spicy italian sandwich that i just had as well, but i seem to think that we were specifically talking about LHC LHC LHC Bill Snyder and ron princes resumes before they were hired to be the head coach at kstate and the fact that you think the only difference was that snyder was once a swim coach and was a coordinator longer.

it struck me odd that someone would say that so i asked if you were being serious. sounds like you were. i'm pretty sure if you put those resumes w/ no names attached and showed them to one hundred random people, one hundred would say that snyders was better. one was an offensive coordiantor for ten years at a big10 school that hadn't had a winning season in twenty years before he got there and then during his time there had a heisman trophy runner up quarterback, won the conference twice, spent half a year ranked #1 in the country and went to a bowl game nine years straight. the other was an o-line coach at james madison, cornell and then then an offensive coordinator for two years at a .500ish ACC school.

I don't think I ever attempted to minimize what Snyder did at Iowa, everything you said is correct, I feel like we're having two different conversations. I will say though that it is obvious that athletic directors in the 1980's didn't interpret Snyder's and Iowa's accomplishments the way that you do. I'm mean he was there for a decade and ended up leaving as the controversial like 5th choice at the worst job in America. That alone leads me to believe that at least in the eyes of athletic directors at the time of their hire Prince was seen at the very least in the same light off Snyder at the time of his hire. I didn't know who the hell Prince was before that off season but K-State wasn't the only job he was at least loosely tied to. Clearly Prince had a better agent and boss.

Offline slobber

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12427
  • Gonna win 'em all!
    • View Profile
Re: Are we talking about this?
« Reply #152 on: August 08, 2014, 03:51:00 PM »
Evidently, yes. Yes we are talking about this. Way more than necessary, but we are certainly talking about this.

Offline BRULL

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 196
    • View Profile
Re: Are we talking about this?
« Reply #153 on: August 08, 2014, 03:53:17 PM »
Yeah, I was going to request that a mod change the name to, "Are we still talking about this?".

 :buh-bye:

Offline meow meow

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11393
    • View Profile
Re: Are we talking about this?
« Reply #154 on: August 08, 2014, 03:58:18 PM »
dax has been everything we needed in these final weeks of combo fan season 2014

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47951
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: Are we talking about this?
« Reply #155 on: August 08, 2014, 04:02:11 PM »
Snyder had a way better resume than Prince when hired by KSU, but I'd certainly hate for that to be the test...   :flush:

That's just not accurate at all. The only difference in their resumes is that Prince didn't coach swimming and Snyder was a coordinator longer.

you don't honestly believe this do you? i mean, iowa won two big 10 championships with snyder as an offense coordinator.

Yes, I believe that most coordinators who get hired as head coaches don't generally get that chance after 9 years at one school. This isn't a terribly controversial stance :dunno: I didn't say anything about the legacy of Snyder's time at Iowa.

If you want to have a conversation about what you posted we can do that too. If you want to give Snyder credit for Iowa's conference titles, that's fine with me. I will say that would be moving the goal posts on how we view coordinators though, I don't seem to remember too many Dana Dimel appreciation threads nor too many BCS schools offering him a head coaching position.

i mean i suppose we could also talk about the spicy italian sandwich that i just had as well, but i seem to think that we were specifically talking about LHC LHC LHC Bill Snyder and ron princes resumes before they were hired to be the head coach at kstate and the fact that you think the only difference was that snyder was once a swim coach and was a coordinator longer.

it struck me odd that someone would say that so i asked if you were being serious. sounds like you were. i'm pretty sure if you put those resumes w/ no names attached and showed them to one hundred random people, one hundred would say that snyders was better. one was an offensive coordiantor for ten years at a big10 school that hadn't had a winning season in twenty years before he got there and then during his time there had a heisman trophy runner up quarterback, won the conference twice, spent half a year ranked #1 in the country and went to a bowl game nine years straight. the other was an o-line coach at james madison, cornell and then then an offensive coordinator for two years at a .500ish ACC school.

I don't think I ever attempted to minimize what Snyder did at Iowa, everything you said is correct, I feel like we're having two different conversations. I will say though that it is obvious that athletic directors in the 1980's didn't interpret Snyder's and Iowa's accomplishments the way that you do. I'm mean he was there for a decade and ended up leaving as the controversial like 5th choice at the worst job in America. That alone leads me to believe that at least in the eyes of athletic directors at the time of their hire Prince was seen at the very least in the same light off Snyder at the time of his hire. I didn't know who the hell Prince was before that off season but K-State wasn't the only job he was at least loosely tied to. Clearly Prince had a better agent and boss.

come on lol, how can this conversation be misconstrued?


point a:  snyder's resume was better than prince's at the time of their hirings

you said:  That's just not accurate at all. The only difference in their resumes is that Prince didn't coach swimming and Snyder was a coordinator longer.

then followed it up with:   If you want to give Snyder credit for Iowa's conference titles, that's fine with me. I will say that would be moving the goal posts on how we view coordinators though
and:  I don't think I ever attempted to minimize what Snyder did at Iowa

i mean, really?   :dunno:


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline GoodForAnother

  • It was all a scheme I used to read emaw magazine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6045
  • You hate to see this Mike
    • View Profile
Re: Are we talking about this?
« Reply #156 on: August 08, 2014, 04:09:23 PM »
My biggest issue with the Snyder comments is that the three biggest beneficiaries of the explosion of tv money are seen in:
1. Coaching salaries
2. Fan amenities
3. Player amenities

With this being said, what the hell is he complaining about? It's not like athletic directors are hoarding this money for themselves. It's literally been better for everyone and this is amazingly evident at Kansas State.

Also this KSU CaliforniaCat gets to watch basically every game on TV.

CFB is amazingly accessible.  you can choose from like 17 different games nationwide on any provider.  can watch most every KSU game nationwide.  meanwhile if I want to watch the royals or the chiefs I've got to pay a shitload of money for mlb.tv or sunday ticket.  dumb.
emaw

Offline Fedor

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1613
    • View Profile
Re: Are we talking about this?
« Reply #157 on: August 08, 2014, 04:15:07 PM »
Snyder had a way better resume than Prince when hired by KSU, but I'd certainly hate for that to be the test...   :flush:

That's just not accurate at all. The only difference in their resumes is that Prince didn't coach swimming and Snyder was a coordinator longer.

you don't honestly believe this do you? i mean, iowa won two big 10 championships with snyder as an offense coordinator.

Yes, I believe that most coordinators who get hired as head coaches don't generally get that chance after 9 years at one school. This isn't a terribly controversial stance :dunno: I didn't say anything about the legacy of Snyder's time at Iowa.

If you want to have a conversation about what you posted we can do that too. If you want to give Snyder credit for Iowa's conference titles, that's fine with me. I will say that would be moving the goal posts on how we view coordinators though, I don't seem to remember too many Dana Dimel appreciation threads nor too many BCS schools offering him a head coaching position.

i mean i suppose we could also talk about the spicy italian sandwich that i just had as well, but i seem to think that we were specifically talking about LHC LHC LHC Bill Snyder and ron princes resumes before they were hired to be the head coach at kstate and the fact that you think the only difference was that snyder was once a swim coach and was a coordinator longer.

it struck me odd that someone would say that so i asked if you were being serious. sounds like you were. i'm pretty sure if you put those resumes w/ no names attached and showed them to one hundred random people, one hundred would say that snyders was better. one was an offensive coordiantor for ten years at a big10 school that hadn't had a winning season in twenty years before he got there and then during his time there had a heisman trophy runner up quarterback, won the conference twice, spent half a year ranked #1 in the country and went to a bowl game nine years straight. the other was an o-line coach at james madison, cornell and then then an offensive coordinator for two years at a .500ish ACC school.

I don't think I ever attempted to minimize what Snyder did at Iowa, everything you said is correct, I feel like we're having two different conversations. I will say though that it is obvious that athletic directors in the 1980's didn't interpret Snyder's and Iowa's accomplishments the way that you do. I'm mean he was there for a decade and ended up leaving as the controversial like 5th choice at the worst job in America. That alone leads me to believe that at least in the eyes of athletic directors at the time of their hire Prince was seen at the very least in the same light off Snyder at the time of his hire. I didn't know who the hell Prince was before that off season but K-State wasn't the only job he was at least loosely tied to. Clearly Prince had a better agent and boss.

come on lol, how can this conversation be misconstrued?


point a:  snyder's resume was better than prince's at the time of their hirings

you said:  That's just not accurate at all. The only difference in their resumes is that Prince didn't coach swimming and Snyder was a coordinator longer.

then followed it up with:   If you want to give Snyder credit for Iowa's conference titles, that's fine with me. I will say that would be moving the goal posts on how we view coordinators though
and:  I don't think I ever attempted to minimize what Snyder did at Iowa

i mean, really?   :dunno:
Are Prince and Snyder's coordinator resumes really the hill you want to die on MIR?
I was wrong and I apologize. - michigancat 8/22/14

Online Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42623
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Are we talking about this?
« Reply #158 on: August 08, 2014, 04:40:20 PM »
:lol:

http://www.thesalutepodcast.com/open-mike-bills-right-know/

Quote
He mentioned the “taj mahals” that are being created around college football in the money era. And he did so while sitting in one that bears his name. You know you command respect when you can do that and not one person calls you a hypocrite. And why would anyone?

Y-W for the page hits, @realmiket.

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7833
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Are we talking about this?
« Reply #159 on: August 08, 2014, 05:27:03 PM »
My biggest issue with the Snyder comments is that the three biggest beneficiaries of the explosion of tv money are seen in:
1. Coaching salaries
2. Fan amenities
3. Player amenities

With this being said, what the hell is he complaining about? It's not like athletic directors are hoarding this money for themselves. It's literally been better for everyone and this is amazingly evident at Kansas State.

Also this KSU CaliforniaCat gets to watch basically every game on TV.

Yes, the last few years have been great

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45938
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: Are we talking about this?
« Reply #160 on: August 08, 2014, 05:51:22 PM »
Snyder had a way better resume than Prince when hired by KSU, but I'd certainly hate for that to be the test...   :flush:

That's just not accurate at all. The only difference in their resumes is that Prince didn't coach swimming and Snyder was a coordinator longer.

you don't honestly believe this do you? i mean, iowa won two big 10 championships with snyder as an offense coordinator.

Yes, I believe that most coordinators who get hired as head coaches don't generally get that chance after 9 years at one school. This isn't a terribly controversial stance :dunno: I didn't say anything about the legacy of Snyder's time at Iowa.

If you want to have a conversation about what you posted we can do that too. If you want to give Snyder credit for Iowa's conference titles, that's fine with me. I will say that would be moving the goal posts on how we view coordinators though, I don't seem to remember too many Dana Dimel appreciation threads nor too many BCS schools offering him a head coaching position.

i mean i suppose we could also talk about the spicy italian sandwich that i just had as well, but i seem to think that we were specifically talking about LHC LHC LHC Bill Snyder and ron princes resumes before they were hired to be the head coach at kstate and the fact that you think the only difference was that snyder was once a swim coach and was a coordinator longer.

it struck me odd that someone would say that so i asked if you were being serious. sounds like you were. i'm pretty sure if you put those resumes w/ no names attached and showed them to one hundred random people, one hundred would say that snyders was better. one was an offensive coordiantor for ten years at a big10 school that hadn't had a winning season in twenty years before he got there and then during his time there had a heisman trophy runner up quarterback, won the conference twice, spent half a year ranked #1 in the country and went to a bowl game nine years straight. the other was an o-line coach at james madison, cornell and then then an offensive coordinator for two years at a .500ish ACC school.

I don't think I ever attempted to minimize what Snyder did at Iowa, everything you said is correct, I feel like we're having two different conversations. I will say though that it is obvious that athletic directors in the 1980's didn't interpret Snyder's and Iowa's accomplishments the way that you do. I'm mean he was there for a decade and ended up leaving as the controversial like 5th choice at the worst job in America. That alone leads me to believe that at least in the eyes of athletic directors at the time of their hire Prince was seen at the very least in the same light off Snyder at the time of his hire. I didn't know who the hell Prince was before that off season but K-State wasn't the only job he was at least loosely tied to. Clearly Prince had a better agent and boss.

come on lol, how can this conversation be misconstrued?


point a:  snyder's resume was better than prince's at the time of their hirings

you said:  That's just not accurate at all. The only difference in their resumes is that Prince didn't coach swimming and Snyder was a coordinator longer.

then followed it up with:   If you want to give Snyder credit for Iowa's conference titles, that's fine with me. I will say that would be moving the goal posts on how we view coordinators though
and:  I don't think I ever attempted to minimize what Snyder did at Iowa

i mean, really?   :dunno:
Are Prince and Snyder's coordinator resumes really the hill you want to die on MIR?

A bit dramatic for an offseason conversation on a message board with hundreds of thousands of posts, no? That's such a stupid trick that people do on message boards, that has been done about half a dozen times in this thread alone. We're having a conversation here, relevance of such conversation has 0 significance. You don't seriously think this is a conversation about the merits of the two coaches do you?


As for your point clams. I very well may have misinterpreted what GOSP meant but my rebuttal was not about what LHC Bill Snyder accomplished at Iowa, it was what his job history was. When he posted that, I thought of this:

Coaching career (HC unless noted)
Gallatin HS (MO) (assistant)
Indio HS (CA) (assistant)
USC (GA)
Indio HS (CA)
Santa Ana Foothill HS (CA)
Austin (OC)
North Texas (assistant)
Iowa (OC)
Kansas State

Coaching career (HC unless noted)
Dodge City CC (volunteer)
Alabama A&M (OL)
South Carolina State (OL)
James Madison (OL)
Cornell (OL)
Virginia (OL)
Virginia (OC)
Kansas State

I absolutely didn't even think of what Snyder did at Iowa. When RowdyBoyy brought up the accomplishments at Iowa my point evolved to pointing out that AD's who hire coaches at the time didn't really care about what Iowa did while Snyder was there. Yes, LHC Bill Snyder did more at Iowa than Ron Prince did at Virginia, who the hell would debate that? All of those accomplishments were not good for much because Ron Prince ended up with a job four times better than what LHC Bill Snyder ended up with.  And before someone tries to attribute something to me that I didn't say, I'm not making the argument that Ron Prince should have gotten a better job than Snyder.

Offline slobber

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12427
  • Gonna win 'em all!
    • View Profile
Re: Are we talking about this?
« Reply #161 on: August 08, 2014, 06:00:13 PM »
I would almost bet $100 dollars that nobody other than you reads all of that (prior to reading this).


Gonna win 'em all!

Offline slobber

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12427
  • Gonna win 'em all!
    • View Profile
Re: Are we talking about this?
« Reply #162 on: August 08, 2014, 06:00:57 PM »
Also, MIR IS BLACK!?! :incredulous:


Gonna win 'em all!

Offline slobber

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12427
  • Gonna win 'em all!
    • View Profile
Re: Are we talking about this?
« Reply #163 on: August 08, 2014, 06:01:37 PM »
Also, I wish Ron Prince was still relevant.


Gonna win 'em all!

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55958
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Are we talking about this?
« Reply #164 on: August 08, 2014, 06:03:26 PM »
I'd already read it all.

I don't know why so many people can't rationally look at what MiR and dax are saying without nitpicking and ignoring the general theme. This blog! I swear!

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67438
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Are we talking about this?
« Reply #165 on: August 08, 2014, 06:05:07 PM »
Mir and Dax, two level-headed posters that never blow things out of proportion, are getting worked up over a nothing story? Is this opposite day? WHAT'S GOING ON HERE?!?!
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55958
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Are we talking about this?
« Reply #166 on: August 08, 2014, 06:08:23 PM »
Mir and Dax, two level-headed posters that never blow things out of proportion, are getting worked up over a nothing story? Is this opposite day? WHAT'S GOING ON HERE?!?!

man oh man did they piss off people convinced it was a non-story.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67438
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Are we talking about this?
« Reply #167 on: August 08, 2014, 06:12:24 PM »
Mir and Dax, two level-headed posters that never blow things out of proportion, are getting worked up over a nothing story? Is this opposite day? WHAT'S GOING ON HERE?!?!

man oh man did they piss off people convinced it was a non-story.

Link?

3/4 of posts in this thread are people saying "who gives a (expletive)"
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45938
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: Are we talking about this?
« Reply #168 on: August 08, 2014, 09:59:23 PM »
Mir and Dax, two level-headed posters that never blow things out of proportion, are getting worked up over a nothing story? Is this opposite day? WHAT'S GOING ON HERE?!?!

man oh man did they piss off people convinced it was a non-story.

Link?

3/4 of posts in this thread are people saying "who gives a (expletive)"

If people don't give a crap why do they think we care whether or not they give a crap? Are people that egocentric where they have to share that they don't care? If people don't care we'd all be better served if they shut the eff up and post on a topic they actually care about. I wish I had the time or cared enough what others thought about me to post in each topic I don't give a crap about.
« Last Edit: August 08, 2014, 10:08:34 PM by MakeItRain »

Offline slobber

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12427
  • Gonna win 'em all!
    • View Profile
Re: Are we talking about this?
« Reply #169 on: August 08, 2014, 10:05:18 PM »
:lol:


Gonna win 'em all!

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67438
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Are we talking about this?
« Reply #170 on: August 08, 2014, 10:33:59 PM »
Well some of us do have enough time Mr mcjudgey
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Katpappy

  • I got my eye on you
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13335
  • Party on gE
    • View Profile
Re: Are we talking about this?
« Reply #171 on: August 09, 2014, 09:57:16 PM »
Snyder had a way better resume than Prince when hired by KSU, but I'd certainly hate for that to be the test...   :flush:

That's just not accurate at all. The only difference in their resumes is that Prince didn't coach swimming and Snyder was a coordinator longer.

you don't honestly believe this do you? i mean, iowa won two big 10 championships with snyder as an offense coordinator.

Yes, I believe that most coordinators who get hired as head coaches don't generally get that chance after 9 years at one school. This isn't a terribly controversial stance :dunno: I didn't say anything about the legacy of Snyder's time at Iowa.

If you want to have a conversation about what you posted we can do that too. If you want to give Snyder credit for Iowa's conference titles, that's fine with me. I will say that would be moving the goal posts on how we view coordinators though, I don't seem to remember too many Dana Dimel appreciation threads nor too many BCS schools offering him a head coaching position.

i mean i suppose we could also talk about the spicy italian sandwich that i just had as well, but i seem to think that we were specifically talking about LHC LHC LHC Bill Snyder and ron princes resumes before they were hired to be the head coach at kstate and the fact that you think the only difference was that snyder was once a swim coach and was a coordinator longer.

it struck me odd that someone would say that so i asked if you were being serious. sounds like you were. i'm pretty sure if you put those resumes w/ no names attached and showed them to one hundred random people, one hundred would say that snyders was better. one was an offensive coordiantor for ten years at a big10 school that hadn't had a winning season in twenty years before he got there and then during his time there had a heisman trophy runner up quarterback, won the conference twice, spent half a year ranked #1 in the country and went to a bowl game nine years straight. the other was an o-line coach at james madison, cornell and then then an offensive coordinator for two years at a .500ish ACC school.

I don't think I ever attempted to minimize what Snyder did at Iowa, everything you said is correct, I feel like we're having two different conversations. I will say though that it is obvious that athletic directors in the 1980's didn't interpret Snyder's and Iowa's accomplishments the way that you do. I'm mean he was there for a decade and ended up leaving as the controversial like 5th choice at the worst job in America. That alone leads me to believe that at least in the eyes of athletic directors at the time of their hire Prince was seen at the very least in the same light off Snyder at the time of his hire. I didn't know who the hell Prince was before that off season but K-State wasn't the only job he was at least loosely tied to. Clearly Prince had a better agent and boss.

come on lol, how can this conversation be misconstrued?


point a:  snyder's resume was better than prince's at the time of their hirings

you said:  That's just not accurate at all. The only difference in their resumes is that Prince didn't coach swimming and Snyder was a coordinator longer.

then followed it up with:   If you want to give Snyder credit for Iowa's conference titles, that's fine with me. I will say that would be moving the goal posts on how we view coordinators though
and:  I don't think I ever attempted to minimize what Snyder did at Iowa

i mean, really?   :dunno:
Are Prince and Snyder's coordinator resumes really the hill you want to die on MIR?

A bit dramatic for an offseason conversation on a message board with hundreds of thousands of posts, no? That's such a stupid trick that people do on message boards, that has been done about half a dozen times in this thread alone. We're having a conversation here, relevance of such conversation has 0 significance. You don't seriously think this is a conversation about the merits of the two coaches do you?


As for your point clams. I very well may have misinterpreted what GOSP meant but my rebuttal was not about what LHC Bill Snyder accomplished at Iowa, it was what his job history was. When he posted that, I thought of this:

Coaching career (HC unless noted)
Gallatin HS (MO) (assistant)
Indio HS (CA) (assistant)
USC (GA)
Indio HS (CA)
Santa Ana Foothill HS (CA)
Austin (OC)
North Texas (assistant)
Iowa (OC)
Kansas State

Coaching career (HC unless noted)
Dodge City CC (volunteer)
Alabama A&M (OL)
South Carolina State (OL)
James Madison (OL)
Cornell (OL)
Virginia (OL)
Virginia (OC)
Kansas State

I absolutely didn't even think of what Snyder did at Iowa. When RowdyBoyy brought up the accomplishments at Iowa my point evolved to pointing out that AD's who hire coaches at the time didn't really care about what Iowa did while Snyder was there. Yes, LHC Bill Snyder did more at Iowa than Ron Prince did at Virginia, who the hell would debate that? All of those accomplishments were not good for much because Ron Prince ended up with a job four times better than what LHC Bill Snyder ended up with.  And before someone tries to attribute something to me that I didn't say, I'm not making the argument that Ron Prince should have gotten a better job than Snyder.
It's very obvious that he did tho.
Hot time in Kat town tonight.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40534
    • View Profile
Re: Are we talking about this?
« Reply #172 on: August 12, 2014, 10:27:15 PM »
Well some of us do have enough time Mr mcjudgey

Lol

Offline J

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1150
  • Just call me "Hollywood"
    • View Profile
Re: Are we talking about this?
« Reply #173 on: August 13, 2014, 11:45:05 PM »
not enough probably

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Are we talking about this?
« Reply #174 on: August 13, 2014, 11:58:56 PM »
What did Snyder do in 1963?  :Wha: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Snyder