Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 335525 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3375 on: December 22, 2016, 09:34:30 PM »
Rebel delegate who communicated directly with Clinton campaign faces possible prosecution.

Sad that they tried to commit election fraud . . . Again

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4059162/Surprise-Electoral-college-rebels-wanted-stop-Trump-touch-Clinton-campaign-movement-s-leader-facing-prosecution.html

They should all be in prison.

It really is sad, what total desperation.   Truly one of the greatest collective political meltdowns of all time.


Offline CatsNShocks

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 555
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3376 on: December 23, 2016, 09:20:15 AM »
It's funny that in every article on this topic they have to put in there that "Hillary won the popular vote by..."
The butthurt is still very strong.
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealth out of prosperity.
What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.
The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3377 on: December 23, 2016, 09:46:56 AM »
It's probably her ring tone

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3378 on: December 24, 2016, 02:18:37 PM »
So first she loses the election, then she pushes for a rust belt recount and Trump expands his lead in those states, then she pushes for electors to defect and more defect from her, expanding Trump's lead even more. Yup, it's a hat trick!



Good riddance (but she still needs to go to prison).
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30435
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3379 on: December 24, 2016, 02:38:53 PM »
LOCK HER UP!
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3380 on: January 06, 2017, 12:28:13 PM »
Supposedly NY Dems want her to run for NY City Mayor.   She is like a roadkill that lays in the road and won't go away.

Online Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20500
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3381 on: January 06, 2017, 12:32:00 PM »
Supposedly NY Dems want her to run for NY City Mayor.   She is like a roadkill that lays in the road and won't go away.

almost no one outside of paid Clinton operatives wants this.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3382 on: January 06, 2017, 01:30:16 PM »
I would think there is a whole shitload of republicans, in races everywhere, that want her to be the sole challenger to them.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3383 on: January 06, 2017, 01:59:08 PM »
I would think there is a whole shitload of republicans, in races everywhere, that want her to be the sole challenger to them.

NYC mayor isn't one of those races

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3384 on: January 06, 2017, 02:01:39 PM »
I would think there is a whole shitload of republicans, in races everywhere, that want her to be the sole challenger to them.

NYC mayor isn't one of those races

Well, yeah.  I was responding to KK.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd


Offline Yard Dog

  • Baller on a Budget
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2468
  • I am DC Cat
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3387 on: January 09, 2017, 08:21:19 AM »

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3388 on: January 09, 2017, 10:01:03 AM »
Yep, but that didn't stop the ProgLib meltdown over a guy who said gay marriage was the law of the land. 

Never let a made up "crisis" go to waste.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3389 on: January 09, 2017, 10:04:04 AM »
Don still hasn't released his taxes yet, you guys.  Lots of speculation that he has a lot of money in his biz from countries that many Americans wouldn't be comfy with. 

Going to be interesting to see how that is treated by those blasting Clinton and Saudis. 

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3390 on: January 09, 2017, 10:13:29 AM »
Don still hasn't released his taxes yet, you guys.  Lots of speculation that he has a lot of money in his biz from countries that many Americans wouldn't be comfy with. 

Going to be interesting to see how that is treated by those blasting Clinton and Saudis.

LOL, corporations all across this country have business dealings on an expansive level with "uncomfortable" countries.   The current president (and former SOS) never met a theocratic dictatorship they wouldn't sell weapons to, as long as they were "with us". 

There's a difference between doing business and selling influence as the sitting SOS. 


Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3391 on: January 09, 2017, 10:16:25 AM »
I agree with most of that.  However, Don doesn't seem to want to blind trust or liquidate.  So, shortly, we may have a president that has very large amts of money that are tied to those govts.  What then?

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3392 on: January 09, 2017, 10:21:34 AM »
I agree with most of that.  However, Don doesn't seem to want to blind trust or liquidate.  So, shortly, we may have a president that has very large amts of money that are tied to those govts.  What then?

Well I agree that is bad if he doesn't put those holdings into a trust.   He's dumb if he doesn't because he will be, and should be investigated. 

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3393 on: January 09, 2017, 10:24:02 AM »
Are people seriously callimg for Don to liquidate his assets? That seems unreadonable and would be unprecedented.

Funny, I don't remember anyone asking the Kerry's to liquidate Heinz or disclose all the countries where they sell ketchup.

GMAFB with this tax return nonsense. I can't believe that's actually expected.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3394 on: January 09, 2017, 10:24:26 AM »
I agree with most of that.  However, Don doesn't seem to want to blind trust or liquidate.  So, shortly, we may have a president that has very large amts of money that are tied to those govts.  What then?

Well I agree that is bad if he doesn't put those holdings into a trust.   He's dumb if he doesn't because he will be, and should be investigated.

What have you seen that makes you think he might not be dumb?

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3395 on: January 09, 2017, 10:26:36 AM »
I agree with most of that.  However, Don doesn't seem to want to blind trust or liquidate.  So, shortly, we may have a president that has very large amts of money that are tied to those govts.  What then?

Well I agree that is bad if he doesn't put those holdings into a trust.   He's dumb if he doesn't because he will be, and should be investigated.

What have you seen that makes you think he might not be dumb?

No more dumb then any of the idiots the left idolizes. 

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3396 on: January 09, 2017, 10:31:16 AM »
Are people seriously callimg for Don to liquidate his assets? That seems unreadonable and would be unprecedented.

Funny, I don't remember anyone asking the Kerry's to liquidate Heinz or disclose all the countries where they sell ketchup.

GMAFB with this tax return nonsense. I can't believe that's actually expected.

Blind Trust is the go to.  I haven't seen anyone saying that liquidation is the way to go.  The Heinz comparo is a bad comparo and you know it, unless they borrow huge amts of money from foreign banks and businesses that we aren't aware of.  I am assuming that isn't the case. 

Offline Mrs. Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9975
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3397 on: January 09, 2017, 01:57:30 PM »
Are people seriously callimg for Don to liquidate his assets? That seems unreadonable and would be unprecedented.

Funny, I don't remember anyone asking the Kerry's to liquidate Heinz or disclose all the countries where they sell ketchup.

GMAFB with this tax return nonsense. I can't believe that's actually expected.

Jimmy Carter sold his peanut farm and they still investigated him.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3399 on: January 12, 2017, 03:08:18 PM »
So obsessed with Hillary he's digging up 6 month old fake news
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite