Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 335106 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29146
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3225 on: November 11, 2016, 02:45:42 PM »
granddaughter Charlotte just turned 2 :curse:

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53336
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3226 on: November 11, 2016, 02:49:53 PM »
Hard to sell access without someone roaming the halls of power.

In other news, 3 new CF sub foundations in the works.   Money laundering is a chore ya know.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3227 on: November 11, 2016, 02:50:46 PM »
 :)

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53336
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3228 on: November 13, 2016, 02:49:18 PM »
In retrospect, given how much the DNC rigged the deal for Hillary.   Was she even a legit candidate? 


Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36685
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3229 on: November 13, 2016, 05:59:03 PM »
Hard to sell access without someone roaming the halls of power.

In other news, 3 new CF sub foundations in the works.   Money laundering is a chore ya know.

With regard of selling access to power, have you read any articles on the trump transition team?

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53336
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3230 on: November 13, 2016, 08:44:59 PM »
Hard to sell access without someone roaming the halls of power.

In other news, 3 new CF sub foundations in the works.   Money laundering is a chore ya know.

With regard of selling access to power, have you read any articles on the trump transition team?

Have any of them been a Senator or Secretary of State and collected tens of millions of dollars from foreign entities towards their "foundations" and for giving "speeches"?

Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16700
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3231 on: November 13, 2016, 10:50:54 PM »
Dax how is it that she lost the election but is still completely in your head?
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53336
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3232 on: November 14, 2016, 05:56:08 AM »
Dax how is it that she lost the election but is still completely in your head?

Weird (and angry) post. 

NYT excuses story just yesterday POSB.

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3233 on: November 14, 2016, 11:11:55 PM »
Quote
CNN reporter tells me Hillary became physically violent towards Robby Mook and John Podesta around midnight; had to be briefly restrained.

temperament

Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16700
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3234 on: November 14, 2016, 11:25:30 PM »
Dax how is it that she lost the election but is still completely in your head?

Weird (and angry) post. 

NYT excuses story just yesterday POSB.

Wait, what does POSB stand for again? I know you threw out some hilarious nickname or another a couple months ago but I can't remember what it was.  :drool:
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3235 on: November 14, 2016, 11:27:00 PM »
Dax how is it that she lost the election but is still completely in your head?

Weird (and angry) post. 

NYT excuses story just yesterday POSB.

Wait, what does POSB stand for again? I know you threw out some hilarious nickname or another a couple months ago but I can't remember what it was.  :drool:

your nickname is bcog (biggest cuck on goEMAW)

how is clitler's moonwalk to the oval office going? :lol:


Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16700
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3236 on: November 14, 2016, 11:28:39 PM »
Dax how is it that she lost the election but is still completely in your head?

Weird (and angry) post. 

NYT excuses story just yesterday POSB.

Wait, what does POSB stand for again? I know you threw out some hilarious nickname or another a couple months ago but I can't remember what it was.  :drool:

your nickname is bcog (biggest cuck on goEMAW)

how is clitler's moonwalk to the oval office going? :lol:

Very slow. Will take at least 4 years.
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3237 on: November 14, 2016, 11:29:31 PM »
bold prediction bcog, but i bet she dies first

Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16700
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3238 on: November 14, 2016, 11:30:57 PM »
i think it was like BennyMeltdown or something but bcog will work great until we can remember the original daxism  :excited:
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3239 on: November 14, 2016, 11:36:51 PM »
bold prediction bcog, but i bet she dies first

She's done. Besides, Warren is going to run in 2020. What a nauesesting election that will be. Thank goodness is a few years off.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline waks

  • this blog's dick pic expert
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3442
  • Aggieville's Original Gastropub
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3240 on: November 15, 2016, 04:26:14 AM »
Quote
CNN reporter tells me Hillary became physically violent towards Robby Mook and John Podesta around midnight; had to be briefly restrained.

temperament
Serious question...do you know anything about the person that your quote comes from?

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7637
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3241 on: November 15, 2016, 08:33:59 AM »
Quote
CNN reporter tells me Hillary became physically violent towards Robby Mook and John Podesta around midnight; had to be briefly restrained.

temperament
Serious question...do you know anything about the person that your quote comes from?

According to several former secret service agents, this is totally within character for hillary.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53336
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3242 on: November 15, 2016, 09:53:18 AM »
A private organization which does their own DefCon rating moved it back to DefCon 5 after Trump got elected.

The world has avoided War Pig Hillary and her disastrous plans.   Thank you Flying Spaghetti Monster!


Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36685
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3243 on: November 15, 2016, 10:43:55 AM »
bold prediction bcog, but i bet she dies first

She's done. Besides, Warren is going to run in 2020. What a nauesesting election that will be. Thank goodness is a few years off.

As much as it seems that both parties are run and organized by absolute morons, I just can't seem to agree that the dems would be that rough ridin' stupid.  I guess for that exact reason, it probably will happen, though. 

Will she even be running against Don, or will the ticket be able to shrug him off and give Pence the correct ticket title by then?

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64043
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3244 on: November 15, 2016, 10:45:48 AM »
I don't think Warren would be popular in a general election. She may run though.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29146
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3245 on: November 15, 2016, 10:57:38 AM »
FAUXCAHONTAS :lol:

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3246 on: November 15, 2016, 11:27:25 AM »
Someone needs to enlighten me as to why Elizabeth Warren running for president would be stupid?

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36685
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3247 on: November 15, 2016, 11:31:52 AM »
Quick take is that if she couldn't be considered as a good enough candidate this go round to challenge Hill, she shouldn't try to oust the guy that just beat Hill.

I also think that the Bernie and Donald support this year shows that both parties should rethink, at least temporarily, how they decide who is next and the running of candidates because it's their turn is the wrong approach.  The public seems to be sick of it and ready for a new approach, imo.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3248 on: November 15, 2016, 11:37:40 AM »
Quick take is that if she couldn't be considered as a good enough candidate this go round to challenge Hill, she shouldn't try to oust the guy that just beat Hill.

I also think that the Bernie and Donald support this year shows that both parties should rethink, at least temporarily, how they decide who is next and the running of candidates because it's their turn is the wrong approach.  The public seems to be sick of it and ready for a new approach, imo.

It was her choice not to run, she wasn't banned or anything. Also you sort of contradicted yourself by mentioning Bernie, they are 100% in lock step on policy positions. She's a younger Bernie with polish.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36685
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #3249 on: November 15, 2016, 11:41:17 AM »
Quick take is that if she couldn't be considered as a good enough candidate this go round to challenge Hill, she shouldn't try to oust the guy that just beat Hill.

I also think that the Bernie and Donald support this year shows that both parties should rethink, at least temporarily, how they decide who is next and the running of candidates because it's their turn is the wrong approach.  The public seems to be sick of it and ready for a new approach, imo.

It was her choice not to run, she wasn't banned or anything. Also you sort of contradicted yourself by mentioning Bernie, they are 100% in lock step on policy positions. She's a younger Bernie with polish.

I have zero doubt that bernie was run as fodder, just like that Webb guy, but that the party was surprised by his popularity.