Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 335170 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2900 on: October 20, 2016, 10:08:06 PM »
 ;)

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2901 on: October 20, 2016, 10:27:29 PM »
Let's see, I need a black, a mexercan, a mooslim, and one of those japanese to fill out my gross, disgusting, dnc political hand of cards. 
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2902 on: October 20, 2016, 10:29:45 PM »
Lol, at being "colorblind" or wanting "equality". It's all about slotting. Like a rich dick who collects cars. eff these people.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2903 on: October 20, 2016, 10:39:51 PM »
that's a lot of rage about something non-dumbshits have been aware happens everywhere for as long as I've paid attention. Is this a revelation to you FSD?

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2904 on: October 20, 2016, 10:50:31 PM »
Well, your resume is impressive native american guy, but we're all full of you people. Do you happen to know a cripple or a tan white guy we could pawn off as ethnic? Quotas are a bitch. We have a lot of loyal, delusional, apologetic dumbshits to appease.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2905 on: October 20, 2016, 10:54:55 PM »
https://archive.fo/VApsq

Just Hillary easily connected to the group that tried to frame one of our heroes as a pedo and Russian spy. Sloppy work!




stunz, explain to me what is going on here in your own words

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2906 on: October 20, 2016, 10:55:40 PM »
that's a lot of rage about something non-dumbshits have been aware happens everywhere for as long as I've paid attention. Is this a revelation to you FSD?

I think it's a revelation to him, sd

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2907 on: October 20, 2016, 10:58:55 PM »
also, there was a bomb threat right by this Clinton shadow ops organization today. Coincidence? obviously not.

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2908 on: October 20, 2016, 11:03:07 PM »
The Manhater gals are popping blood vessels because Don called MG a Nasty Woman.  He called Ted Cruz a nasty guy.  He is equal opportunity in action.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2909 on: October 20, 2016, 11:03:22 PM »

also, there was a bomb threat right by this Clinton shadow ops organization today. Coincidence? obviously not.

Russians, duh.
#libtards
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2910 on: October 20, 2016, 11:06:42 PM »
https://archive.fo/VApsq

Just Hillary easily connected to the group that tried to frame one of our heroes as a pedo and Russian spy. Sloppy work!




stunz, explain to me what is going on here in your own words

https://archive.fo/VApsq

Just Hillary easily connected to the group that tried to frame one of our heroes as a pedo and Russian spy. Sloppy work!




Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2911 on: October 20, 2016, 11:15:09 PM »
 :lol:
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2912 on: October 20, 2016, 11:19:00 PM »
Itt libs trying to justify racism cause everyone does it. Lots of projection lately, the left blaming their faults on the right. Racism, violent rallies, wars, gun violence, the biggest puppet ever calling the least puppet ever a puppet.

 :clap:

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2913 on: October 21, 2016, 01:02:23 AM »
Not at all surprising that stunted and fsd have now decided that identifying people by race, gender, sexual preference, or employment is "racist." Hilarious.

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2914 on: October 21, 2016, 01:57:45 AM »
I don't particularly think that's very racist, but we have different definitions, and going by the left's this is disgusting. It's obvious it was going on, but I would have assumed a list with more minorities and women mixed in by position, but nope, they're separated like farm animals (and none of the white ones).

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile

Offline Mrs. Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9975
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2916 on: October 21, 2016, 08:26:39 AM »
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15560

Quote
"From:[email protected] To: [email protected] Date: 2008-10-06 20:38 Subject: Diversity

Barack --

Following up on your conversations with John over the weekend, attached are two documents:

-- A list of African American, Latino and Asian American candidates, divided between Cabinet/Deputy and Under/Assistant/Deputy Assistant Sectetary levels, as well as lists of senior Native Americans, Arab/Muslim Americans and Disabled Americans. We have longer lists, but these are candidates whose names have been recommended by a number of sources for senior level jobs in a potential Administration.

-- A list of women, similarly divided between candidates for Cabinet/Deputy and other senior level positions.

Please let us know if you have any questions.

-- Mike Froman"

More food groups :lol:

Everyone recognizes this as disgusting, right? 

These are horrible horrible people in the DNC.

Were the women listed in the first group also, according to their ethnicity? Or were they all white women?

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2917 on: October 21, 2016, 09:01:41 AM »
Remember when Romney said "Binders full of women" when talking about all the women he employs, and we got three weeks of editorials about how he hates women, degrades women, is out of touch with women.

Now we have tangible evidence the dnc herds people into train cars based on ethnicity, some religion, disability, in order to propogate the lie that they care about minorities, and the libtards response is to viciously attack the people who exposed their bullshit.

It doesn't get any more nazi, disingenious and pathetic than that. :lol:
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2918 on: October 21, 2016, 09:14:53 AM »
The world is a big, confusing place. Be careful out there.

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15223
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2919 on: October 21, 2016, 09:18:01 AM »
Two things you seem to be missing here:

(1) Anyone who is not a dumbass already knew the hierarchy of both major parties talks and thinks this way. Same for really any major business that does marketing ("we need to appeal more to hispanics").

(2) These stories aren't getting any traction because Republicans nominated the most morally deprived person they could find who is a natural media magnet. It's what won him the nomination. Trump can't just flip the switch afterwards and complain about the attention all being on him.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2920 on: October 21, 2016, 09:20:50 AM »
he's enraged

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39169
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2921 on: October 21, 2016, 09:22:34 AM »
i remember when clinton picked gore in 92 it was a bold move because they were both in the southern white dude about the same age food group

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39169
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2922 on: October 21, 2016, 09:23:15 AM »
and i was like 5 at the time and i realized that

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2923 on: October 21, 2016, 09:42:06 AM »
i remember when clinton picked gore in 92 it was a bold move because they were both in the southern white dude about the same age food group
The best.presidents.come.from.either.the.south or.rural.areas.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39169
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2924 on: October 21, 2016, 09:44:17 AM »
"mccain picking Palin in 2008 had nothing to do with mccain getting his ass whipped by obama with women" - fsd