Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 335432 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2875 on: October 19, 2016, 07:00:23 AM »
Clinton just shy of 50% in RCP poll average.
I hope she is overconfident tonight.

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2876 on: October 19, 2016, 08:42:46 AM »
https://archive.fo/VApsq

Just Hillary easily connected to the group that tried to frame one of our heroes as a pedo and Russian spy. Sloppy work!



Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2877 on: October 19, 2016, 08:48:31 AM »
Possums feed on dead.carcass from the bunghole forward.  President Hillary, the Media Possums will target you next.

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2878 on: October 19, 2016, 09:07:55 AM »
It's like the more you dig into Trump's scandals, the more bullshit they get (besides pussygate). The more you dig into Hillary's scandals, the more worse and damning they get.

I know everyone is irrational and all this fancy logic psychology stuff I learned from Dilbert guy, but I can't see how anyone can continually support this witch.


Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2879 on: October 19, 2016, 09:38:37 AM »
I feel like my vote is a vote for someone achieving their lifelong goal. I like to help others. Go Hillary. Donald likes attention and money, he's getting and will continue to get plenty. So I can feel good for him too.

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2880 on: October 19, 2016, 09:39:04 AM »
It's a win win for both candidates.

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2881 on: October 19, 2016, 09:47:57 AM »
I feel like my vote is a vote for someone achieving their lifelong goal. I like to help others. Go Hillary. Donald likes attention and money, he's getting and will continue to get plenty. So I can feel good for him too.

i have thought similar, especially when you know she wants it so bad, and also what if she's not the evil person everyone says she is.

Offline Yard Dog

  • Baller on a Budget
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2468
  • I am DC Cat
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2882 on: October 19, 2016, 10:55:18 AM »
I feel like my vote is a vote for someone achieving their lifelong goal. I like to help others. Go Hillary. Donald likes attention and money, he's getting and will continue to get plenty. So I can feel good for him too.

i have thought similar, especially when you know she wants it so bad, and also what if she's not the evil person everyone says she is.

What if guys????  :excited:

Online steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85344
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2883 on: October 19, 2016, 11:13:13 AM »
I don't care if she's evil as long as she's evil for my benefit

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2884 on: October 19, 2016, 11:44:16 AM »
 :thumbs:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2885 on: October 19, 2016, 11:54:05 AM »
if the evil things are true (and "The more you dig into Hillary's scandals, the more worse and damning they get."), she'll be evil for nobody's benefit besides those corrupt at the top.

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2886 on: October 19, 2016, 12:14:40 PM »
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/18353#efmACvAD2

Quote
It worries me more that she doesn't seem to know what planet we are all living in at the moment.

hillary's evil is for all of us to benefit from!

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2887 on: October 19, 2016, 12:29:34 PM »
We should all love each other . . . well unless a president is doing really bad and wrong things to people and I am benefiting from it, then you know, love, it's relative, and, ya know, subjective and crap.      :thumbsup:


Online steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85344
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2888 on: October 19, 2016, 12:38:08 PM »
she'll be evil for nobody's benefit besides those corrupt at the top.

well that covers me #I'mwithherandthereforemyself

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2889 on: October 19, 2016, 12:39:15 PM »
Rumors that Hillary totally lost her crap at the C-an-C forum after her stint.   Really pissed about Lauer and had a total eyes rolling into the back of her head meltdown. 


Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2890 on: October 19, 2016, 12:40:23 PM »
i love you steve dave but i don't think even super alpha studs like us are included :frown:

Online steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85344
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2891 on: October 19, 2016, 12:41:31 PM »
i love you steve dave but i don't think even super alpha studs like us are included :frown:

  :frown:

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2892 on: October 19, 2016, 12:43:21 PM »
Great scoop dax
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2893 on: October 20, 2016, 05:06:43 PM »
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15560

Quote
"From:[email protected] To: [email protected] Date: 2008-10-06 20:38 Subject: Diversity

Barack --

Following up on your conversations with John over the weekend, attached are two documents:

-- A list of African American, Latino and Asian American candidates, divided between Cabinet/Deputy and Under/Assistant/Deputy Assistant Sectetary levels, as well as lists of senior Native Americans, Arab/Muslim Americans and Disabled Americans. We have longer lists, but these are candidates whose names have been recommended by a number of sources for senior level jobs in a potential Administration.

-- A list of women, similarly divided between candidates for Cabinet/Deputy and other senior level positions.

Please let us know if you have any questions.

-- Mike Froman"

More food groups :lol:

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39169
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2894 on: October 20, 2016, 06:16:37 PM »
Abe, any relation to this Mike guy?

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2897 on: October 20, 2016, 09:54:31 PM »
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15560

Quote
"From:[email protected] To: [email protected] Date: 2008-10-06 20:38 Subject: Diversity

Barack --

Following up on your conversations with John over the weekend, attached are two documents:

-- A list of African American, Latino and Asian American candidates, divided between Cabinet/Deputy and Under/Assistant/Deputy Assistant Sectetary levels, as well as lists of senior Native Americans, Arab/Muslim Americans and Disabled Americans. We have longer lists, but these are candidates whose names have been recommended by a number of sources for senior level jobs in a potential Administration.

-- A list of women, similarly divided between candidates for Cabinet/Deputy and other senior level positions.

Please let us know if you have any questions.

-- Mike Froman"

More food groups :lol:

Everyone recognizes this as disgusting, right? 

These are horrible horrible people in the DNC.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Online steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85344
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2898 on: October 20, 2016, 10:00:23 PM »
it's not surprising or interesting to anyone except complete dumbshits. are you a complete dumbshit fsd?

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #2899 on: October 20, 2016, 10:05:48 PM »
Trust me, nobody is surprised by that disgusting behavior.

Where do you fit in Obama's food groups? Perhaps I should be voting for Hillary after all.