Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 335258 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29146
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1750 on: July 22, 2016, 12:09:03 AM »
plus he's sort of from kc.

is that good?

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40528
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1751 on: July 22, 2016, 12:40:35 AM »
it's where the state of kansas is sort of from too, if that answers your question.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Online Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29146
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1752 on: July 22, 2016, 12:43:27 AM »
hmm.  think I'll pass

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1753 on: July 22, 2016, 08:00:28 AM »
I don't get the Kaine choice. You pick a boring VP when you don't want them to overshadow you in the campaign. Like Trump picking Pence. You also pick a VP to try to reach out to a voting bloc you're weak in. Like Trump picking Pence.

Hillary could do with an enthusiasm boost. She's a terrible, charmless, grating candidate. She could also do with reaching out to her socialist base who is still feeling the Bern. That's why I was expecting it to be Warren. Seems like she needs to focus on whipping up the women/socialist vote as much as possible in order to win this thing. It's almost as if she's subliminally saying "vote for me because I'm a woman, but don't worry - I've also got this boring white guy over here just in case this goes off the rails."
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1754 on: July 22, 2016, 09:03:50 AM »
No one gives a crap about the vp unless it's amazingly bad like sarah palin
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1755 on: July 22, 2016, 09:12:37 AM »
Kaine brings the Hillary corruption factor down from 11 to 10.5.


Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20499
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1756 on: July 22, 2016, 09:45:17 AM »
Kaine brings the Hillary corruption factor down from 11 to 10.5.

well except for the part where Terry McCauliffe is picking Kaine's replacement and is even odds to get in a Blago like scandal surrounding that.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1757 on: July 22, 2016, 09:48:46 AM »
Kaine brings the Hillary corruption factor down from 11 to 10.5.

well except for the part where Terry McCauliffe is picking Kaine's replacement and is even odds to get in a Blago like scandal surrounding that.

True.  Wow thanks for reminding me about more Dem corruption.   Sad.

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20499
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1758 on: July 22, 2016, 09:51:27 AM »
What a world if the Republican candidate goes out of his way to mention his respect of LGBTQ rights in his acceptance speech and does not mention abortion once and the Democratic ticket has a pro-life VP.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1759 on: July 22, 2016, 10:11:12 AM »
What a world if the Republican candidate goes out of his way to mention his respect of LGBTQ rights in his acceptance speech and does not mention abortion once and the Democratic ticket has a pro-life VP.

Yes, what a world.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1760 on: July 22, 2016, 10:14:02 AM »
What a world if the Republican candidate goes out of his way to mention his respect of LGBTQ rights in his acceptance speech and does not mention abortion once and the Democratic ticket has a pro-life VP.

quite the pickle for single issue voters

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1761 on: July 22, 2016, 10:19:44 AM »
What a world if the Republican candidate goes out of his way to mention his respect of LGBTQ rights in his acceptance speech and does not mention abortion once and the Democratic ticket has a pro-life VP.

quite the pickle for single issue voters

Maybe it will cause them to finally understand that issue will never have anything done about it and voting on abortion alone is a waste of time
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39169
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1762 on: July 22, 2016, 11:55:17 AM »
Tim Kaine is RockState1976  :surprised:

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15223
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1763 on: July 22, 2016, 12:53:22 PM »
What a world if the Republican candidate goes out of his way to mention his respect of LGBTQ rights in his acceptance speech and does not mention abortion once and the Democratic ticket has a pro-life VP.

quite the pickle for single issue voters

Maybe it will cause them to finally understand that issue will never have anything done about it and voting on abortion alone is a waste of time

The president actually has a greater ability to change abortion laws than most other things on their platform. The controversy is not over legislation but SCOTUS interpretation, which numerous times has been a vote away from swinging the opposite way (i.e., abortion is not a constitutional right).

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1764 on: July 22, 2016, 01:08:09 PM »
What a world if the Republican candidate goes out of his way to mention his respect of LGBTQ rights in his acceptance speech and does not mention abortion once and the Democratic ticket has a pro-life VP.

quite the pickle for single issue voters

Maybe it will cause them to finally understand that issue will never have anything done about it and voting on abortion alone is a waste of time

The president actually has a greater ability to change abortion laws than most other things on their platform. The controversy is not over legislation but SCOTUS interpretation, which numerous times has been a vote away from swinging the opposite way (i.e., abortion is not a constitutional right).

Quite a bit has been "done" on abortion, and there is quite a bit still to do. This isn't saying much, but pro life folks have a better chance of advancing their agenda under Trump than Clinton - especially if they bring some kids to the White House who weren't aborted and Trump is "super impressed" by them. I'm pretty sure that mandatory abortion is now a plank of the Dem party. Look every party needs things to rally around - for the Dems, one of those thing is killing babies. It is extremely important.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1765 on: July 22, 2016, 01:11:00 PM »
It realize is crazy that people take issue with others killing their unborn children, or police killing violent criminals.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1766 on: July 22, 2016, 01:14:05 PM »
What a world if the Republican candidate goes out of his way to mention his respect of LGBTQ rights in his acceptance speech and does not mention abortion once and the Democratic ticket has a pro-life VP.

quite the pickle for single issue voters

Maybe it will cause them to finally understand that issue will never have anything done about it and voting on abortion alone is a waste of time

The president actually has a greater ability to change abortion laws than most other things on their platform. The controversy is not over legislation but SCOTUS interpretation, which numerous times has been a vote away from swinging the opposite way (i.e., abortion is not a constitutional right).

Quite a bit has been "done" on abortion, and there is quite a bit still to do. This isn't saying much, but pro life folks have a better chance of advancing their agenda under Trump than Clinton - especially if they bring some kids to the White House who weren't aborted and Trump is "super impressed" by them. I'm pretty sure that mandatory abortion is now a plank of the Dem party. Look every party needs things to rally around - for the Dems, one of those thing is killing babies. It is extremely important.

Sounds rational  :Ugh:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1767 on: July 22, 2016, 08:10:57 PM »
The Butcher.Bitch of Planned Hamburger wants unfettered groundbaby packets for all.  If you don't care about the unborn, then you have no moral integrity and honesty to say you care about anyone and.the.will.take.care of them.  The snuff.queen has to be.stopped.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40528
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1768 on: July 22, 2016, 08:23:22 PM »
i'm pretty impressed with clinton's vp choice.  i'm still ruminating, but there's a good chance i will vote clinton-kaine in 2016.  i hope gary will understand.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1769 on: July 22, 2016, 08:32:53 PM »
i'm pretty impressed with clinton's vp choice.  i'm still ruminating, but there's a good chance i will vote clinton-kaine in 2016.  i hope gary will understand.

A vote for war and corruption: Not surprised

Offline Canary

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2962
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1770 on: July 22, 2016, 08:37:14 PM »
What a world if the Republican candidate goes out of his way to mention his respect of LGBTQ rights in his acceptance speech and does not mention abortion once and the Democratic ticket has a pro-life VP.

quite the pickle for single issue voters

Maybe it will cause them to finally understand that issue will never have anything done about it and voting on abortion alone is a waste of time
I would love to have that conversation with my right-wing siblings.  I don't think some of them could stomach voting for a Democrat. But they jump all over the "abortion is the only issue" stance. Could pose quite the conundrum for a few.

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1771 on: July 22, 2016, 09:08:19 PM »
NBC is.reporting Mean Grandma is peeved that WUD spoke mean things about America.  But.when asked if she denied.his.claims, she said.he.is mean and.she hates orange.  Still no answer on the gorilla question.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1772 on: July 22, 2016, 09:53:20 PM »
Kaine is awful, stop acting like he isn't
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline gatoveintisiet

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 772
  • the maverick
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1773 on: July 22, 2016, 10:05:38 PM »
Hill must be feeling pretty confident to select a racist white dude for VP.
You are dipping into the Kool Aid and you don't even know what flavor it is.

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15223
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1774 on: July 23, 2016, 09:30:15 AM »
i'm pretty impressed with clinton's vp choice.  i'm still ruminating, but there's a good chance i will vote clinton-kaine in 2016.  i hope gary will understand.

Gary just wants you to consider him. If you decide he's not for you then he's probably cool with it.

And if you live in Kansas, then I'm sure a vote for Clinton REALLY wouldn't bother him.