Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 335168 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1725 on: July 14, 2016, 04:15:54 PM »
Plus, pretty much everyone know b.o. didn't let hill rod do anything when she was stooge of state. Maybe she's butthurt?
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16700
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1726 on: July 14, 2016, 06:35:47 PM »
It's stunning the lengths that the Democratic party is going to in order to maintain power.   They're now willing to set aside everything, even supporting a racist corrupt Neo-Con like Hillary in order to maintain the White House.    Sad.

http://nypost.com/2016/07/12/fbi-agents-signed-nda-for-matters-involving-hillarys-emails/

FYI to all pit'rs, this is dax's new "KU pressbox is an old German pillbox."
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53336
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1727 on: July 14, 2016, 06:45:29 PM »
It's stunning the lengths that the Democratic party is going to in order to maintain power.   They're now willing to set aside everything, even supporting a racist corrupt Neo-Con like Hillary in order to maintain the White House.    Sad.

http://nypost.com/2016/07/12/fbi-agents-signed-nda-for-matters-involving-hillarys-emails/

FYI to all pit'rs, this is dax's new "KU pressbox is an old German pillbox."

I just like to remind the sell out party of their sell out, early and often. 


Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1728 on: July 14, 2016, 07:28:27 PM »
It's stunning the lengths that the Democratic party is going to in order to maintain power.   They're now willing to set aside everything, even supporting a racist corrupt Neo-Con like Hillary in order to maintain the White House.    Sad.

http://nypost.com/2016/07/12/fbi-agents-signed-nda-for-matters-involving-hillarys-emails/

FYI to all pit'rs, this is dax's new "KU pressbox is an old German pillbox."

I just like to overexplain, early and often.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53336
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1729 on: July 14, 2016, 08:10:59 PM »
It's stunning the lengths that the Democratic party is going to in order to maintain power.   They're now willing to set aside everything, even supporting a racist corrupt Neo-Con like Hillary in order to maintain the White House.    Sad.

http://nypost.com/2016/07/12/fbi-agents-signed-nda-for-matters-involving-hillarys-emails/

FYI to all pit'rs, this is dax's new "KU pressbox is an old German pillbox."

I just like to overexplain, early and often.

You continue to embarrass yourself in this forum.   Sad   


Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1730 on: July 17, 2016, 12:56:45 AM »

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39169
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1731 on: July 17, 2016, 01:04:53 AM »
What am i looking at here stunzy

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51509
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1732 on: July 17, 2016, 09:00:55 AM »
What am i looking at here stunzy

The next president

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1733 on: July 17, 2016, 09:26:24 AM »
Granted my apartment is cleaner and nicer, I can only imagine her facial expression would be much the same.

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1734 on: July 17, 2016, 09:26:53 AM »
And I'd love it.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1735 on: July 17, 2016, 12:22:02 PM »
Kind of reminds me of pulp fiction
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1736 on: July 17, 2016, 08:26:17 PM »
Donald and Obarak fairly soon after the baton rouge shooting.  seven hours later after consulting a focus group she responded.  I want to know would.she have shot the gorilla or dithered while the kid died.  She can't make smart quick decision.  She has no feeling in her gut.  Just a dried whithered cold turd.

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1737 on: July 20, 2016, 09:01:54 PM »
Kentucky Congressman Clete Wilson today at the RNC accused Hilliary Clinton of crapping on an American flag at a Mexican Muslim Black Lives Matters gay parade, and he said they should put her in a orange.pantsuit and throw her in jail.  Commentors on CNN, MSNBC, and ABC were livid.  They commented the meaness of the Congressman was unfathomable.  They retorted everyone knows HIllary does not wear orange.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51509
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1738 on: July 21, 2016, 09:40:38 AM »
Is his name really Clete?!

Online CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36685
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1739 on: July 21, 2016, 09:41:45 AM »
Renosock should get with Hemmy, print out his entire gE catalog, and send it in to a few media outlets.  I am sure he would be hired as content director, editor, or something like that quickly. 


Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1740 on: July 21, 2016, 09:49:25 AM »
Renosock should get with Hemmy, print out his entire gE catalog, and send it in to a few media outlets.  I am sure he would be hired as content director, editor, or something like that quickly.

He should send them to the Kansas Republican party headquarters. He'd be a big step up from Clay Barker.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1741 on: July 21, 2016, 10:45:13 AM »
Renocat wouldn't survive the vetting process
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Online CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36685
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1742 on: July 21, 2016, 10:47:00 AM »
Renocat wouldn't survive the vetting process

He would turn it on it's ear.  Not only would he be hired, but anyone with dissenting opinions during the hiring process would quickly be purged and replaced with other SB socks.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1743 on: July 21, 2016, 11:14:02 AM »
Renocat wouldn't survive the vetting process

If Cruz's speech could survive the vetting process, I think Reno will be just fine.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1744 on: July 21, 2016, 09:46:34 PM »
Tim Kaine? as VP?
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Online Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20498
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1745 on: July 21, 2016, 11:17:19 PM »
Tim Kaine? as VP?

It will be stupid and bad, no doubt.  But it won't matter, just like no one will talk about Mike Pence again until the VP debate.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40528
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1746 on: July 21, 2016, 11:25:17 PM »
It will be stupid and bad, no doubt.

why?
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Online Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20498
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1747 on: July 21, 2016, 11:38:07 PM »
It will be stupid and bad, no doubt.

why?

why will Hillary's pick be stupid and bad?  Because the short list I've seen:

Vilsack- been passed over for VP by every democrat since Clinton in 92?
Booker- takes a democratic Senator and lets Christie pick replacement
Kaine- passed over by Obama, not good on stump or debates

Again, it doesn't matter much.  But at the same time, Biden laughing and belittling Paul Ryan came after Romney mopped the floor with Obama in the first debate.  The Candy Crowley thing still would've been disastrous, but the momentum shifted and I think that lead to Romney feeling he needed to push himself which may well have turned the tide.

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15223
    • View Profile
Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1748 on: July 21, 2016, 11:49:56 PM »
I think the tide turned in the last election as soon as Republicans picked the most boring, white, uninteresting person they possibly could.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40528
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1749 on: July 21, 2016, 11:54:20 PM »
why will Hillary's pick be stupid and bad?  Because the short list I've seen...

oh, i thought you meant that kaine was a stupid and bad choice, not that all her options were stupid and bad.


i think kaine is fine.  not inspired, but a good solid candidate (my exposure is that i vaguely know his resume and reputation and once heard a short local radio interview w. him when he was running for senate).  definitely better than many of her other mentioned possibilities.

plus he's sort of from kc.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."