Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 335152 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline treysolid

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3483
  • complacent and self-involved
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1275 on: March 01, 2016, 12:07:42 PM »
Trump won't be able to resist bullying her (because he loves bullying women...Fiorina, Kelly, O'Donnell) and Clinton in the past has kicked major ass in elections when her male counterpart tried to bully her.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1276 on: March 01, 2016, 12:37:57 PM »
If she wants to go after his foreign policy ineptitude, he got her Libyan intervention and Iraq war vote.

This one's interesting

Not really.  I mean, Brittan has been actively discussing banning Trump from their country.  They can't be the only country with this view on him.  That is a different kind of level from just not being up to date on policy and world affairs.

I just think it would be interesting to have a republican candidate criticize her Iraq vote while also saying we need to kill families of suspected terrorists.

Sort of like a rich, entitled, undeserving white woman talking about wealth/gender/race inequality.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19132
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1277 on: March 01, 2016, 12:40:27 PM »
Why is she undeserving?
:adios:

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64043
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1278 on: March 01, 2016, 12:41:13 PM »
What makes her entitled and undeserving?
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1279 on: March 01, 2016, 12:41:48 PM »
What's wrong with pointing out the hypocrisy in her Iraq vote?

Or, what makes her deserving?
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64043
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1280 on: March 01, 2016, 12:42:56 PM »
Nothing, the iraq vote should be pointed out
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite


Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1282 on: March 01, 2016, 12:58:45 PM »
If there's one thing voters care about this year, it's Libya.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17593
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1283 on: March 01, 2016, 01:01:58 PM »
If she wants to go after his foreign policy ineptitude, he got her Libyan intervention and Iraq war vote.

This one's interesting

Not really.  I mean, Brittan has been actively discussing banning Trump from their country.  They can't be the only country with this view on him.  That is a different kind of level from just not being up to date on policy and world affairs.

I just think it would be interesting to have a republican candidate criticize her Iraq vote while also saying we need to kill families of suspected terrorists.

Sort of like a rich, entitled, undeserving white woman talking about wealth/gender/race inequality.


And yet instead of playing any of those cards, the Republicans are going with Trump

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53336
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1284 on: March 01, 2016, 01:02:08 PM »
They should, because it's now a major national security issue.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1285 on: March 01, 2016, 10:30:59 PM »
So this bad person is going to win the nomination on the strength of winning red states by a lot, lovely. We're going to have a Democrat nominee that won't be the popular choice in actual blue and purple states, hot crap, well done crats.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40528
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1286 on: March 01, 2016, 10:36:19 PM »
congratulations, your majesty.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1287 on: March 01, 2016, 10:41:53 PM »
It was an amazing strategy to go into southern churches and just repeat the word Obama a lot to low educated, pro life, anti gay, democrat black folks. If I ever come face to face with one of these pasty ass pundits talking about Hillary and the black vote like we're a monolith I'm going to murder one of them with my bare hands. I assure you all she didn't win the black vote in Minnesota and Colorado.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39169
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1288 on: March 01, 2016, 10:48:30 PM »
Minnesota is vastly studlier than i thought. Rubio and Sanders, wow

Offline gatoveintisiete

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4036
  • Cold Ass Honkey
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1289 on: March 01, 2016, 10:51:16 PM »
Yeah anybody that thinks black 'crats won't vote their own mind in a 'crat primary............
Everybody knows they are not a voting monolith, just look at the facts for Christs sake.
it’s not like I’m tired of WINNING, but dude, let me catch my breath.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1290 on: March 01, 2016, 11:15:02 PM »
She is a psychopath who lost 4 states to a bumbling isolationist imbecile (who is also out fund raising her).  Not exactly the strongest candidate.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1291 on: March 02, 2016, 02:58:20 AM »
It was an amazing strategy to go into southern churches and just repeat the word Obama a lot to low educated, pro life, anti gay, democrat black folks. If I ever come face to face with one of these pasty ass pundits talking about Hillary and the black vote like we're a monolith I'm going to murder one of them with my bare hands. I assure you all she didn't win the black vote in Minnesota and Colorado.

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/03/young-voter-challenges-clinton-on-african-american-issues-is-dismissed-and-ushered-out-by-aides/

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1292 on: March 02, 2016, 08:22:11 AM »
Minnesota is vastly studlier than i thought. Rubio and Sanders, wow

This is quite promising, really. 

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36685
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1293 on: March 03, 2016, 04:08:40 PM »
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/what-does-a-former-staffers-immunity-deal-mean-for-hillary-clinton/2016/03/03/0fbb6ab2-e15e-11e5-846c-10191d1fc4ec_story.html

Quote
Bryan Pagliano — a 2008 presidential campaign worker who set up the server in Clinton’s home — will avoid charges as he cooperates with FBI agents is a significant, if incremental, development, according to former federal prosecutors and white-collar defense lawyers who have been following the case.

Do they hand out immunity all willy nilly on most cases where there is absolutely nothing going on?

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64043
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1294 on: March 03, 2016, 04:31:28 PM »
Probably
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30431
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1295 on: March 03, 2016, 06:55:54 PM »
All the time
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53336
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1296 on: March 03, 2016, 08:29:34 PM »
Dems are white knuckling this so hard. 

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19132
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1297 on: March 03, 2016, 08:54:24 PM »

Dems are white knuckling this so hard.

Moderates are just looking at properties in Vancouver
:adios:

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53336
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1298 on: March 03, 2016, 10:06:06 PM »


Dems are white knuckling this so hard.

Moderates are just looking at properties in Vancouver

If Hillary gets elected?  Totally understandable.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1299 on: March 03, 2016, 11:05:15 PM »
Like half the leftist media outlets are still denying she had a server in her bathroom. Now immunity for the plumber/network guy  :lol:
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd