Author Topic: Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)  (Read 335388 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1075 on: January 30, 2016, 02:02:58 PM »
I would personally be surprised if the DOJ indicted her in this administration, because the DOJ under obama is closer to the gestapo than a criminal justice bureau. It's a rough ridin' joke.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1076 on: January 30, 2016, 02:04:03 PM »
Fyi, that's really bad. R's and D's tho :rolleyes:
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1077 on: January 30, 2016, 02:25:03 PM »
I would personally be surprised if the DOJ indicted her in this administration, because the DOJ under obama is closer to the gestapo than a criminal justice bureau. It's a rough ridin' joke.

 :lol:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30432
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1078 on: January 30, 2016, 03:21:34 PM »
I would personally be surprised if the DOJ indicted her in this administration, because the DOJ under obama is closer to the gestapo than a criminal justice bureau. It's a rough ridin' joke.

Exactly.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1079 on: January 30, 2016, 03:25:38 PM »
There have been people forced to retire under scorn and ridicule for far less (possibly summarily demoted even after their dismissal).

Look at the ProgLib apologists on this board . . . . so far in the tank for their movement they'll literally make excuses for anything in a quest for power.  Sad

Only in ProgLib Whack-A-Doodle land would anyone attempt to hide behind "well, there wasn't really a clear cut policy".  I mean  :lol:

There's a super clear cut policy against treating classified info like instagram.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1080 on: January 30, 2016, 05:56:25 PM »
There have been people forced to retire under scorn and ridicule for far less (possibly summarily demoted even after their dismissal).

Look at the ProgLib apologists on this board . . . . so far in the tank for their movement they'll literally make excuses for anything in a quest for power.  Sad

Only in ProgLib Whack-A-Doodle land would anyone attempt to hide behind "well, there wasn't really a clear cut policy".  I mean  :lol:

There's a super clear cut policy against treating classified info like instagram.

It's funny that the only way your entire party can have a conversation is by assuming that anyone who questions your belief system must by default be a fundamentalist party member of your opposition. Pure black and white.
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1081 on: January 30, 2016, 06:18:02 PM »
I'm far more worried about the FOIA issue than classified documents issue. I just don't have as much blind faith and trust in our dear government leaders as republicans do.

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1082 on: January 30, 2016, 07:19:56 PM »
If MG is the model.woman, why don't they have a toad in a pantsuit Barbie?

Offline IPA4Me

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7007
  • El Guapo
    • View Profile
    • Life Advice
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1083 on: January 30, 2016, 07:24:25 PM »
Because of the delay in release?
I'm far more worried about the FOIA issue than classified documents issue. I just don't have as much blind faith and trust in our dear government leaders as republicans do.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1084 on: January 30, 2016, 08:57:30 PM »
There have been people forced to retire under scorn and ridicule for far less (possibly summarily demoted even after their dismissal).

Look at the ProgLib apologists on this board . . . . so far in the tank for their movement they'll literally make excuses for anything in a quest for power.  Sad

Only in ProgLib Whack-A-Doodle land would anyone attempt to hide behind "well, there wasn't really a clear cut policy".  I mean  :lol:

There's a super clear cut policy against treating classified info like instagram.

It's funny that the only way your entire party can have a conversation is by assuming that anyone who questions your belief system must by default be a fundamentalist party member of your opposition. Pure black and white.

#whack-a-doodle-post
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1085 on: January 30, 2016, 08:59:45 PM »
I said, even more hilarious that edn Whack-A-Doodle continues to clamor for excuses.   Pathetic and sad.

But typical


Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1086 on: January 30, 2016, 11:35:48 PM »
You guys don't really believe she is going to be indicted right?
I'd like to think that they aren't that dumb and blinded by R's and D's but :dunno:

Handling national security like it's email spam is a partisan issue? :sdeek:

No it isn't, not at all; your viewpoint of what will and should happen is though

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1087 on: January 30, 2016, 11:43:40 PM »
I would personally be surprised if the DOJ indicted her in this administration, because the DOJ under obama is closer to the gestapo than a criminal justice bureau. It's a rough ridin' joke.

Exactly.

I appreciate the fact that anyone who doesn't see this issue the way the obviously partisan right sees this issue is the partisan hack, all the way up to the top. The doj has an agenda but the conservative blogs you guys are getting fed from have all the right answers.

Offline IPA4Me

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7007
  • El Guapo
    • View Profile
    • Life Advice
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1088 on: January 31, 2016, 06:51:35 AM »
Have any of you ever held a TS government clearance?

Offline gatoveintisiete

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4036
  • Cold Ass Honkey
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1089 on: January 31, 2016, 07:18:09 AM »
Just me I think...
it’s not like I’m tired of WINNING, but dude, let me catch my breath.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1090 on: January 31, 2016, 08:43:53 AM »
I've only been skimming the last page or so. Is MIR actually saying that he doesn't think Hillary should be indicted and convicted of mishandling classified information? That that is not warranted, but only ginned up by the partisan right?
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1091 on: January 31, 2016, 08:52:59 AM »
You guys don't really believe she is going to be indicted right?
I'd like to think that they aren't that dumb and blinded by R's and D's but :dunno:

Handling national security like it's email spam is a partisan issue? :sdeek:

No it isn't, not at all; your viewpoint of what will and should happen is though

Not elect that person president :dunno:

How is that illogical?

goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1092 on: January 31, 2016, 09:03:28 AM »
I would personally be surprised if the DOJ indicted her in this administration, because the DOJ under obama is closer to the gestapo than a criminal justice bureau. It's a rough ridin' joke.

Exactly.

That being said, if the pubs take the whitehouse, she will be indicted (rightfully so) and probably cooked.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1093 on: January 31, 2016, 09:15:24 AM »
Because of the delay in release?
I'm far more worried about the FOIA issue than classified documents issue. I just don't have as much blind faith and trust in our dear government leaders as republicans do.
Because she was trying to avoid a release altogether

Offline IPA4Me

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7007
  • El Guapo
    • View Profile
    • Life Advice
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1094 on: January 31, 2016, 09:27:30 AM »
No judgement with this question. Just looking for perspective.
Have any of you ever held a TS government clearance?

Offline EMAWican

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1202
  • 'Murica
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1095 on: January 31, 2016, 10:42:11 AM »
No judgement with this question. Just looking for perspective.
Have any of you ever held a TS government clearance?
I have a friend with a TS clearance at Honeywell and it's his opinion that if he did the stuff that Hilrod did, he'd get X-filled and never heard from again. You bring up a legit point that people in this thread can't apparently comprehend.

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9558
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1096 on: January 31, 2016, 11:07:20 AM »
I would personally be surprised if the DOJ indicted her in this administration, because the DOJ under obama is closer to the gestapo than a criminal justice bureau. It's a rough ridin' joke.

Exactly.

That being said, if the pubs take the whitehouse, she will be indicted (rightfully so) and probably cooked.

Ok, indict Colin Powell too then. He used a personal e-mail as well.

Offline IPA4Me

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7007
  • El Guapo
    • View Profile
    • Life Advice
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1097 on: January 31, 2016, 11:40:53 AM »
I would personally be surprised if the DOJ indicted her in this administration, because the DOJ under obama is closer to the gestapo than a criminal justice bureau. It's a rough ridin' joke.

Exactly.

That being said, if the pubs take the whitehouse, she will be indicted (rightfully so) and probably cooked.

Ok, indict Colin Powell too then. He used a personal e-mail as well.
Did he transmit classified material in violation of his NDA? If so, press onward.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36687
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1098 on: January 31, 2016, 11:58:04 AM »
Agreed. 

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile
Re: Hillary 2016? (Now Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch)
« Reply #1099 on: January 31, 2016, 12:05:20 PM »
Hillary is running for President only so she can escape these charges. It isn't right or fair that the people who elect her don't care about this issue. Or that she'll get a free pass when elected. But that's just the world we live in, I guess.