Hillary LOL (f/k/a Hillary Clinton Indictment Watch f/k/a Hillary 2016?)

[michigancat]

KSUW is an excellent source for all things Hillary

I love how nothing he posts has anything to do with her policy proposals. NOTHING!

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

KSUW is an excellent source for all things Hillary

I love how nothing he posts has anything to do with her policy proposals. NOTHING!

I'm pointing out her corruption. Regardless of policy, we shouldn't have any family that corrupt back in the WH.

But I'd also be happy to discuss her policy proposals. What is she running on? (Besides being a woman, a Clinton, and a former SOS that presided over a steller run of amazing decisions in the middle east).

[michigancat]

yes, asking someone to stand in line for autographs is very corrupt

[Rage Against the McKee]

KSUW is an excellent source for all things Hillary

I love how nothing he posts has anything to do with her policy proposals. NOTHING!

Character is more important than policy proposals.

[CNS]

The awfulness of her new logo is not getting enough play.  We should probably spend some more time on that too. 

I mean, a red arrow pointing right.  Is she trying to Jedi mind eff the really dumb portion of the 'pubs?

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

yes, asking someone to stand in line for autographs is very corrupt

Fine. Corrupt and/or just generally nasty/entitled/arrogant, etc. But mainly it's the corruption that bothers me.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

KSUW is an excellent source for all things Hillary

I love how nothing he posts has anything to do with her policy proposals. NOTHING!

Well well well, we've got our first hillarybot.

Why don't you tell us about hillary ' s great policies and how her actual conduct is lock stock and barrel in line with those policies

rough ridin' lemming.

[michigancat]

Hillary's policies suck, I will never vote for her.

[Kat Kid]

Don't have a dog in this Hillary rude to people in a line fight, but I thought this guy made some good points.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2015/06/01/hillary-to-autographseekers-go-to-the-end-of-the-line-n2006610

[Spracne]

Hillary's policies suck, I will never vote for her.

typical libtard robotic response

[star seed 7]

Someone needs to make HER go to the end of the line. Her imperioousness is neither attractive nor welcome. Not sure who she thinks died and made HER Queen (and therefore entitled), but she needs a wake-up call as soon as possible.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Hillary's policies suck, I will never vote for her.

You're lying on a messageboard. Which is perfectly okay. But you should identify yourself irl as a lemming.

[star seed 7]

i love how angry the neocons get when libs don't like hillary 

[Kat Kid]

Republicans running in 2016 I'd vote for against Hillary:

1) Kasich
2) Paul

Democrats

1) Bernie Sanders

[renocat]

 Mean Grannie strikes.

[star seed 7]

the few paragraphs i've read about kasich, i could def get behind him

[Kat Kid]

the few paragraphs i've read about kasich, i could def get behind him

President Nixon on twitter is strong for him.  Endorsed quite early.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Why are libtards so angry about freedom?

[puniraptor]

Why are libtards so angry about freedom?

'Cause its not free!!!!

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Why are libtards so angry about freedom?

'Cause its not free!!!!

Why are they so angry about having to pay for things? NO $$$?

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

Hey look, a Clinton "policy" we can discuss! http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2015/06/03/clinton-to-call-for-at-least-20-days-of-early-voting-nationwide/?wpisrc=al_alert-politics

Yes, we need to make it as easy as possible to buss the libtard drones to the polls...

In other news, 8 out of 10 likely voters favor mandatory voter ID.

[star seed 7]

So are you against early voting because

1) MG suggested it
2) you think it will hurt your team
3) actual reason

I'd really love to know

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

So are you against early voting because

1) MG suggested it
2) you think it will hurt your team
3) actual reason

I'd really love to know

I'm against *long* early voting periods because it allows both parties to engage in "banking" of votes from people who are generally so uninformed and unengaged that they shouldn't be voting in the first place.

To a point, making it easier to vote is a good thing. But if you go too far, to the point the political machines are all but casting votes for the drones, you actually start to disenfranchise the people who should be voting - the ones who actually educate themselves.

Now from a Dem v GOP perspective, there's no question that the Democrats rely more heavily on getting the ignorant and/or unengaged to the polls. Which is why Democrats always want to make it easier to vote, whereas the GOP would prefer to tighten things up.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/390669/trouble-early-voting-john-fund

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/01/29/problems-with-early-voting-and-the-promise-of-future-voting/

[star seed 7]

lol

[renocat]

MS MG Clinton should just put a big old warning light in her butt to remind us that she wants a big centralized queendom government. The federal government sets the date when the president is chosen, but the states determine how voting is done. She wants to usurp thr constitution.   Voting going on for her for 20 days would be like having dry heavea and projectile diarrhea for a year.