Author Topic: Kentucky  (Read 7002 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Kentucky
« on: March 29, 2014, 08:43:45 AM »
Is really rough ridin' good. And you dorks are mad at oscar for losing to them. :lol:


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16224
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: Kentucky
« Reply #1 on: March 29, 2014, 08:48:32 AM »
Ok

Offline meow meow

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11393
    • View Profile
Re: Kentucky
« Reply #2 on: March 29, 2014, 09:15:30 AM »
You dorks!!

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Kentucky
« Reply #3 on: March 29, 2014, 09:32:18 AM »
CASE CLOSED!!!

Online steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88576
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Kentucky
« Reply #4 on: March 29, 2014, 09:37:01 AM »
Exceeded expectations with tons of adversity

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Kentucky
« Reply #5 on: March 29, 2014, 09:42:05 AM »
I guess we don't accept losing to other good teams.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Kentucky
« Reply #6 on: March 29, 2014, 09:45:54 AM »
I guess we don't accept losing to other good teams.
That's fine, but to BID for it is really dumb. Wisconsin had Franks # and no one wanted to BID after those losses. So rude!

Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: Kentucky
« Reply #7 on: March 29, 2014, 09:52:00 AM »
I mean, the gap between us and teams like Kentucky and Lville is stunning.  Size, speed, length, strength.  It's like we're putting boys up against men.  Maybe guard play is mildly comparable.  To me, the big difference is the front courts.  We have Gip and DJamer.  It's startling. 

I'm not BID, but we're not even in the same stratosphere.

Offline EMAWzified

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4244
    • View Profile
Re: Kentucky
« Reply #8 on: March 29, 2014, 10:29:24 AM »
Hope we're considerably upgraded in size next year.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18069
    • View Profile
Re: Kentucky
« Reply #9 on: March 29, 2014, 10:32:47 AM »
I guess we don't accept losing to other good teams.
That's fine, but to BID for it is really dumb. Wisconsin had Franks # and no one wanted to BID after those losses. So rude!

Not exactly apples to apples

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55959
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Kentucky
« Reply #10 on: March 29, 2014, 10:40:29 AM »
I said they were the most underseeded team in the country.

Offline CHONGS

  • The Producer
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20117
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: Kentucky
« Reply #11 on: March 29, 2014, 10:43:53 AM »
Is really rough ridin' good. And you dorks are mad at oscar for losing to them. :lol:
It would take an amazing x and o coach to beat that team, especially if playing them with such a huge talent gap left by the previous coach.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Kentucky
« Reply #12 on: March 29, 2014, 01:08:14 PM »
It would take an amazing x and o coach to beat that team, especially if playing them with such a huge talent gap left by the previous coach.

i was thinking the exact same thing.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53907
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Kentucky
« Reply #13 on: March 29, 2014, 01:09:05 PM »
I said they were the most underseeded team in the country.

You totally did

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Kentucky
« Reply #14 on: March 29, 2014, 01:13:09 PM »
I said they were the most underseeded team in the country.

You totally did

you must feel stupid for overlooking dayton.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Kentucky
« Reply #15 on: March 29, 2014, 01:14:42 PM »
I said they were the most underseeded team in the country.

very bold to say the #12 BPI team was the most under seeded as an 8 seed

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55959
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Kentucky
« Reply #16 on: March 29, 2014, 01:18:17 PM »
I said they were the most underseeded team in the country.

You totally did

you must feel stupid for overlooking dayton.

tourney's not over

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Kentucky
« Reply #17 on: March 30, 2014, 08:41:37 PM »
 :D

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Kentucky
« Reply #18 on: March 30, 2014, 08:58:28 PM »
why the eff are you bumping this thread?

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Kentucky
« Reply #19 on: March 30, 2014, 10:03:09 PM »
why the eff are you bumping this thread?
Good question? World?

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16224
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: Kentucky
« Reply #20 on: April 01, 2014, 08:17:45 AM »
fanning thinks he's a genius for saying that the preseason #1 is a really good team

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59549
    • View Profile
Re: Kentucky
« Reply #21 on: April 01, 2014, 08:24:11 AM »
No, what's hilarious was the BID crowd after K-State lost to Kentucky.

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: Kentucky
« Reply #22 on: April 01, 2014, 08:35:25 AM »
What sucks is that people are okay with losing to a good team.  Losing should not be okay.  Not saying that after every loss it's torches and pitchforks but there are no moral victories.

Online Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: Kentucky
« Reply #23 on: April 01, 2014, 08:38:23 AM »
Maybe if we don't lose to Northern Colorado on our home floor, we don't end up having to play an 8 seed like Kentucky in the first round of the tournament. :dunno:

Online Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42623
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Kentucky
« Reply #24 on: April 01, 2014, 08:44:07 AM »
Our 4th loss in a row was kentucky's 1st win out of 4 in a row.  Hang a banner.