0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: pike on April 29, 2010, 02:28:37 AMSugardick still said he'll provide video evidence of a 747 hitting the Pentagon?It was on the History channel or something. They had the truthers on and were comparing their stories with people in the real world that could actually do the things the truthers said happened. They showed the video to the truthers and they were like, "that doesn't prove anything! where did the plane go after it crashed?" The guy was like, "there's wreckage all over the place". Truthers had some ridiculous response, like that's missile wreckage or something.They also tested to see if jet fuel can melt the metal trusses the truthers said was impossible. It canThen they asked a demolition guy if he could blow up a building using some special liquid plasma stuff the truthers say was found at the crash scene (which it wasn't). They then tested the plasma and it didn't work.The truthers also said something about elevators being fixed as the cover to set the explosives. The demo guy laughed and said, there was no f*cking way a demolition of a building that size could be done in that short of a period without bringing a million people and making a sh*t load of noise.You guys probably wouldn't have liked the show.
Sugardick still said he'll provide video evidence of a 747 hitting the Pentagon?
Quote from: Sugar Dick on April 29, 2010, 01:10:24 PMQuote from: pike on April 29, 2010, 02:28:37 AMSugardick still said he'll provide video evidence of a 747 hitting the Pentagon?It was on the History channel or something. They had the truthers on and were comparing their stories with people in the real world that could actually do the things the truthers said happened. They showed the video to the truthers and they were like, "that doesn't prove anything! where did the plane go after it crashed?" The guy was like, "there's wreckage all over the place". Truthers had some ridiculous response, like that's missile wreckage or something.They also tested to see if jet fuel can melt the metal trusses the truthers said was impossible. It canThen they asked a demolition guy if he could blow up a building using some special liquid plasma stuff the truthers say was found at the crash scene (which it wasn't). They then tested the plasma and it didn't work.The truthers also said something about elevators being fixed as the cover to set the explosives. The demo guy laughed and said, there was no f*cking way a demolition of a building that size could be done in that short of a period without bringing a million people and making a sh*t load of noise.You guys probably wouldn't have liked the show.That show was broadcast by the government-controlled media. The only news that's real news comes from internet blogs, where people don't need worthless crap like sources or credentials.
So Pike, how deep does this conspiracy run? Was it just the Bush administration, or was congress involved as well? Any military involvement? Do you have any names other than Bush and any evidence not in the form of a question?
Quote from: Nuts Kicked on April 29, 2010, 12:47:46 PMQuote from: sonofdaxjones on April 28, 2010, 05:24:40 PMSigh . . . it's not a matter of just crashing a 757 into the Pentagon. It's not like they just took control of the plane a few miles from the Pentagon, punched the stick down and dove right into it.The dude flew the plane for many miles, and then executed a series of intricate turns and descents at relatively high speed, and then lined the plane up to slam into the side wall of a building that while it's huge, isn't that tall . . . and did it with near pin point precision at over 400 knots. That's not something some kid playing Modern Warfare 2 on XBox learns to do in 10 hours. Got damn . . . amazing. Wouldn't a real pilot have been able to to line the plane up during this flight that went "many miles" so that he wouldn't have to make the intricate series of turns and descents at high speed? Umm . . . a lot of flying, particularly in large airplanes requires a series of intricate steps to execute a plan, 757's aren't helicopters or 4 wheelers in the pasture.
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on April 28, 2010, 05:24:40 PMSigh . . . it's not a matter of just crashing a 757 into the Pentagon. It's not like they just took control of the plane a few miles from the Pentagon, punched the stick down and dove right into it.The dude flew the plane for many miles, and then executed a series of intricate turns and descents at relatively high speed, and then lined the plane up to slam into the side wall of a building that while it's huge, isn't that tall . . . and did it with near pin point precision at over 400 knots. That's not something some kid playing Modern Warfare 2 on XBox learns to do in 10 hours. Got damn . . . amazing. Wouldn't a real pilot have been able to to line the plane up during this flight that went "many miles" so that he wouldn't have to make the intricate series of turns and descents at high speed?
Sigh . . . it's not a matter of just crashing a 757 into the Pentagon. It's not like they just took control of the plane a few miles from the Pentagon, punched the stick down and dove right into it.The dude flew the plane for many miles, and then executed a series of intricate turns and descents at relatively high speed, and then lined the plane up to slam into the side wall of a building that while it's huge, isn't that tall . . . and did it with near pin point precision at over 400 knots. That's not something some kid playing Modern Warfare 2 on XBox learns to do in 10 hours. Got damn . . . amazing.
Yeah, an auto pilot helped the guy get to Washington, but it didn't fly the plane in the critical last few minutes nor get the aircraft set up to hit the Pentagon where it did. Plus, here's another really simple question Flight 77 hit the Pentagon nearly 37 minutes after the 2nd plane hit the WTC, and nearly an hour after the 1st plane hit the WTC.Where was the fighter cover for Washington DC?? Oh yeah, our multi-trillion dollar national defense system still had "its pants down". Designed to find and intercept Russian Backfire and Bear Strategic Bombers and track 1000's of space vehicles and incoming ICBM's . . . completely incapable of stopping an airliner from hitting the Pentagon nearly an hour after it got one of the biggest wake up calls in world history. Not even Hollywood could conjure up such a tale.
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on May 01, 2010, 11:30:21 AMYeah, an auto pilot helped the guy get to Washington, but it didn't fly the plane in the critical last few minutes nor get the aircraft set up to hit the Pentagon where it did. Plus, here's another really simple question Flight 77 hit the Pentagon nearly 37 minutes after the 2nd plane hit the WTC, and nearly an hour after the 1st plane hit the WTC.Where was the fighter cover for Washington DC?? Oh yeah, our multi-trillion dollar national defense system still had "its pants down". Designed to find and intercept Russian Backfire and Bear Strategic Bombers and track 1000's of space vehicles and incoming ICBM's . . . completely incapable of stopping an airliner from hitting the Pentagon nearly an hour after it got one of the biggest wake up calls in world history. Not even Hollywood could conjure up such a tale.Maybe they knew how impossible it would be for these guys to hit their target?
pike, you better come to the next big pak (probably the UCLA game) and be as spirited about all this in real life as you are on the board.
pike, what are your thoughts on Roswell?
Quote from: BMWJhawk on May 02, 2010, 02:37:43 PMpike, what are your thoughts on Roswell? Eh, I honestly think it was a weather balloon but who knows.
Quote from: pike on May 02, 2010, 04:53:16 PMQuote from: BMWJhawk on May 02, 2010, 02:37:43 PMpike, what are your thoughts on Roswell? Eh, I honestly think it was a weather balloon but who knows.The true definition of irony. You do realize that the initial report from the military was that it was a crashed UFO, right?
Quote from: BMWJhawk on May 02, 2010, 04:56:52 PMQuote from: pike on May 02, 2010, 04:53:16 PMQuote from: BMWJhawk on May 02, 2010, 02:37:43 PMpike, what are your thoughts on Roswell? Eh, I honestly think it was a weather balloon but who knows.The true definition of irony. You do realize that the initial report from the military was that it was a crashed UFO, right? you do realize that the term "UFO" is used quite often, dont you?
Quote from: mortons toe on May 02, 2010, 06:13:07 PMQuote from: BMWJhawk on May 02, 2010, 04:56:52 PMQuote from: pike on May 02, 2010, 04:53:16 PMQuote from: BMWJhawk on May 02, 2010, 02:37:43 PMpike, what are your thoughts on Roswell? Eh, I honestly think it was a weather balloon but who knows.The true definition of irony. You do realize that the initial report from the military was that it was a crashed UFO, right? you do realize that the term "UFO" is used quite often, dont you? Yeah, if the weather balloon was unidentified and in the air, then it's a UFO. If it crashed, it's a "crashed UFO".BMW isn't a very smart fella
The actual term they used was "flying saucer." I used the term "UFO" because most people relate that to an extraterrestrial spacecraft, as opposed to arguing semantics just for the sake of argument. You guys are a bunch of dicks.
On July 8, 1947, Roswell Army Air Field (RAAF) public information office in Roswell, New Mexico, issued a press release [3] stating that personnel from the field's 509th Bomb Group had recovered a crashed "flying disc" from a ranch near Roswell, sparking intense media interest. The following day, the press reported that Commanding General of the Eighth Air Force stated that, in fact, a radar-tracking balloon had been recovered by the RAAF personnel, not a "flying disc."[4] A subsequent press conference was called, featuring debris from the crashed object that confirmed the weather balloon description.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roswell_UFO_Incident
Quote from: BMWJhawk on May 02, 2010, 08:00:22 PMhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roswell_UFO_Incident
"The many rumors regarding the flying disk became a reality yesterday when the intelligence office of the 509th Bomb Group of the Eight Air Force, Roswell Army Air Field, was fortunate enough to gain possession of a disc through the co-operation of one of the local ranchers and the Sheriff's Office of Chaves county."The flying object landed on a ranch near Roswell sometime last week. Not having phone facilities, the rancher stored the disc until such time as he was able to contact the Sheriff's office, who in turn notified Major Jesse A. Marcel, of the 509th Bomb Group Intelligence office."Action was immediately taken and the disc was picked up at the rancher's home. It was inspected at the Roswell Army Air Field and subsequently loaned by Major Marcel to higher headquarters." (San Francisco Chronicle - July 9, 1947)
Here's more, Dick Face (you will probably enjoy this too, pike):http://www.roswellfiles.com/story.htmhttp://www.roswellfiles.com/witness.htmQuote"The many rumors regarding the flying disk became a reality yesterday when the intelligence office of the 509th Bomb Group of the Eight Air Force, Roswell Army Air Field, was fortunate enough to gain possession of a disc through the co-operation of one of the local ranchers and the Sheriff's Office of Chaves county."The flying object landed on a ranch near Roswell sometime last week. Not having phone facilities, the rancher stored the disc until such time as he was able to contact the Sheriff's office, who in turn notified Major Jesse A. Marcel, of the 509th Bomb Group Intelligence office."Action was immediately taken and the disc was picked up at the rancher's home. It was inspected at the Roswell Army Air Field and subsequently loaned by Major Marcel to higher headquarters." (San Francisco Chronicle - July 9, 1947)