0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Jake is going to mush gE next year. The ratio of flip-flops to denial will be fascinating.
Michigan is not great, but it was the culmination of steady improvement, and it was an outstanding game, good is not accurate.
If it were up to me, Wintz would be on a fan scholarship, full ride.
Quote from: Pendergast on December 29, 2013, 03:16:03 PMJake is going to mush gE next year. The ratio of flip-flops to denial will be fascinating.I went back and looked at normal improvement for returning QBs in their SR year going back to Chad May. Here are the projected stats for Jake based on "normal QB improvement" under Snyder (this doesn't take into account splitting time with another QB, about 70-30 this year.)Passing: 221-347 (64%) 3450 yards 9.9 YPA 28 TDs 11 INTs Rushing: 124 att 350 yards 2.8 YPC 8 TDs
in the end, EMAW will always win.
How many QB's had outstanding games against Michigan this year?
Quote from: michigancat on December 29, 2013, 03:30:08 PMHow many QB's had outstanding games against Michigan this year?Several, but Waters' 191.66 QB rating was by far the best. Next was 157.3 for Indiana and 145.15 for Ohio St. The average QB rating against them was 123.85.In other words, Jake was pretty damn good.
Quote from: ksu_FAN on December 29, 2013, 04:08:38 PMQuote from: michigancat on December 29, 2013, 03:30:08 PMHow many QB's had outstanding games against Michigan this year?Several, but Waters' 191.66 QB rating was by far the best. Next was 157.3 for Indiana and 145.15 for Ohio St. The average QB rating against them was 123.85.In other words, Jake was pretty damn good.QB rating is the best way to compare QB performance.
Hey jack stack. Get the eff out of here, you miserable wanker.
Quote from: EMAWmeister on December 29, 2013, 04:04:31 PMHey jack stack. Get the eff out of here, you miserable wanker. Why would I be miserable? We won a bowl game and Waters played well. If one game decides the starting QB, Sams shouldve been locked in after Baylor and OSU, especially since he ran the same plays over and over.
Quote from: Jackstack99EMAW on December 29, 2013, 04:38:06 PMQuote from: EMAWmeister on December 29, 2013, 04:04:31 PMHey jack stack. Get the eff out of here, you miserable wanker. Why would I be miserable? We won a bowl game and Waters played well. If one game decides the starting QB, Sams shouldve been locked in after Baylor and OSU, especially since he ran the same plays over and over.We didn't have any choice but to let Sams take over OSU/BU.
Quote from: EMAWmeister on December 29, 2013, 05:08:45 PMQuote from: Jackstack99EMAW on December 29, 2013, 04:38:06 PMQuote from: EMAWmeister on December 29, 2013, 04:04:31 PMHey jack stack. Get the eff out of here, you miserable wanker. Why would I be miserable? We won a bowl game and Waters played well. If one game decides the starting QB, Sams shouldve been locked in after Baylor and OSU, especially since he ran the same plays over and over.We didn't have any choice but to let Sams take over OSU/BU. We could have played Waters.
Quote from: michigancat on December 29, 2013, 05:30:02 PMQuote from: EMAWmeister on December 29, 2013, 05:08:45 PMQuote from: Jackstack99EMAW on December 29, 2013, 04:38:06 PMQuote from: EMAWmeister on December 29, 2013, 04:04:31 PMHey jack stack. Get the eff out of here, you miserable wanker. Why would I be miserable? We won a bowl game and Waters played well. If one game decides the starting QB, Sams shouldve been locked in after Baylor and OSU, especially since he ran the same plays over and over.We didn't have any choice but to let Sams take over OSU/BU. We could have played Waters.It would have been dink and dunk city