Author Topic: Shockers  (Read 115457 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cfbandyman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11067
  • To da 'ville.
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #350 on: February 26, 2014, 01:56:07 PM »
BPI has the shockers at #7 which IMO is closer to reality.  They are a solid team with veteran and experienced players who haven't let a game slip against second rate competition.  They haven't played enough tournament teams though to give them the clout needed for a 1 seed in my book.  The committee shouldn't award them for playing a soft schedule and not losing, precisely the opposite: no 1 seed for super weak scheduling teams from horrible conferences regardless of record (set a precedent).  Marshall needs to get off his high horse and play some road games at major schools if he wants to avoid this in the future.

Course they could do more, but they did play Tennessee, @ ALA, and @ SLU (a tourny team and 25-2), yes, the MVC isn't lights out but that noncon is at least something. They also got wins over a 2nd place BYU team and the first place team in the Southern in Davidson. Top flight noncon? No. Weak? Not too much, it is #34 noncon SOS according to ESPN. Other than playing one or two top RPI top 50 noncon I don't know what really more they could do. For reference K-State's non conference SOS is 148.
A&M Style: 1/19/13 Co-Champion of THE ED's College Basketball Challenge

The art of the deal with it poors

OG Elon hater


Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #351 on: February 26, 2014, 02:05:52 PM »
WSU vs ku in the tournament would be hilarious.  :crossfingers: :pray:

I would TSC my face off.

Fortunately, the "S" comes first....  Was glorious the last time.

http://kuhistory.com/articles/shocked/
bears are fast...

Offline sunny_cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14367
  • eff off
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #352 on: February 26, 2014, 02:12:32 PM »
WSU vs ku in the tournament would be hilarious.  :crossfingers: :pray:

I would TSC my face off.

Fortunately, the "S" comes first....  Was glorious the last time.

http://kuhistory.com/articles/shocked/

But since they're both the same S, move on to C. :tsc:

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #353 on: February 26, 2014, 02:16:55 PM »
WSU vs ku in the tournament would be hilarious.  :crossfingers: :pray:

I would TSC my face off.

Fortunately, the "S" comes first....  Was glorious the last time.

http://kuhistory.com/articles/shocked/

But since they're both the same S, move on to C. :tsc:

I'm all S, bruh... All S.  There's a reason it's TSC, not TCS. 

 :dubious:
bears are fast...

Offline sunny_cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14367
  • eff off
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #354 on: February 26, 2014, 02:18:38 PM »
WSU vs ku in the tournament would be hilarious.  :crossfingers: :pray:

I would TSC my face off.

Fortunately, the "S" comes first....  Was glorious the last time.

http://kuhistory.com/articles/shocked/

But since they're both the same S, move on to C. :tsc:

I'm all S, bruh... All S.  There's a reason it's TSC, not TCS. 

 :dubious:

So since they're the same S, you get to pick without even using C? :nono:

Offline AbeFroman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8330
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #355 on: February 26, 2014, 02:25:25 PM »
WSU vs ku in the tournament would be hilarious.  :crossfingers: :pray:

I would TSC my face off.

Fortunately, the "S" comes first....  Was glorious the last time.

http://kuhistory.com/articles/shocked/

The last paragraph is pretty funny. Phantom foul butthurt and "smug" Wichita State

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #356 on: February 26, 2014, 02:29:03 PM »
Butthurt phoggies are some of the most entertaining people on the planet...  I really don't think you understand the entertainment value inherent in a WSU win over ku, ESPECIALLY in their beloved game of basketball.

I'm gonna stand pat.

 :pray:
bears are fast...

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 22867
  • Gentleman | Polymath | Renowned Lover
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #357 on: February 26, 2014, 02:34:15 PM »
Butthurt phoggies are some of the most entertaining people on the planet...  I really don't think you understand the entertainment value inherent in a WSU win over ku, ESPECIALLY in their beloved game of basketball.

I'm gonna stand pat.

 :pray:

I do not want to play WSU ever, unless it's in the E8 or beyond.
My winning smile and can-do attitude.

Offline Brock Landers

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7241
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #358 on: February 26, 2014, 02:36:25 PM »
WSU vs ku in the tournament would be hilarious.  :crossfingers: :pray:

I would TSC my face off.

Fortunately, the "S" comes first....  Was glorious the last time.

http://kuhistory.com/articles/shocked/

The last paragraph is pretty funny. Phantom foul butthurt and "smug" Wichita State


Yeah, they conveniently ignore how Valentine missed the front end of a 1 and 1 and then missed a breakaway layup.  Point shaving perhaps?

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15571
    • View Profile


Offline ydarg2012

  • Baller on a Budget
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1116
  • Snyder 4 President
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #361 on: February 27, 2014, 08:58:24 AM »
WSU vs ku in the tournament would be hilarious.  :crossfingers: :pray:

I would TSC my face off.

Fortunately, the "S" comes first....  Was glorious the last time.

http://kuhistory.com/articles/shocked/

About KU coach Ted Owens:

"The editors of the magazine claimed that he was consistently out-coached by his conference peers, and for some inexplicable reason his Jayhawks “regularly lost to teams with less talent.” To add further insult the magazine quoted NBA scouts who claimed that Owens’s system handicapped his players’ chances of being selected early in the draft. The magazine ultimately concluded that the “noose hangs high for Owens.”

Sound familiar?

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53906
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #362 on: February 27, 2014, 09:11:46 AM »
I would love to see Ku v. WSU in the tourney.  KU would dive bomb them by 10 or more.

Offline 0.42

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7746
  • pasghetti
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #363 on: February 27, 2014, 10:31:10 AM »
Oh Kirstie....

http://collegespun.com/homepage/kirstie-alley-got-into-it-with-doug-gottlieb-over-wichita-states-ncaa-resume#

Does KSU make an active effort to count her as one of "our" alums? Because if so that needs to stop like rough ridin' pronto.

Offline AbeFroman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8330
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #364 on: February 27, 2014, 10:47:16 AM »
Kirstie is TSC'ing hard.  :love:

Offline ydarg2012

  • Baller on a Budget
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1116
  • Snyder 4 President
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #365 on: February 27, 2014, 11:43:33 AM »
BPI has the shockers at #7 which IMO is closer to reality.  They are a solid team with veteran and experienced players who haven't let a game slip against second rate competition.  They haven't played enough tournament teams though to give them the clout needed for a 1 seed in my book.  The committee shouldn't award them for playing a soft schedule and not losing, precisely the opposite: no 1 seed for super weak scheduling teams from horrible conferences regardless of record (set a precedent).  Marshall needs to get off his high horse and play some road games at major schools if he wants to avoid this in the future.

Course they could do more, but they did play Tennessee, @ ALA, and @ SLU (a tourny team and 25-2), yes, the MVC isn't lights out but that noncon is at least something. They also got wins over a 2nd place BYU team and the first place team in the Southern in Davidson. Top flight noncon? No. Weak? Not too much, it is #34 noncon SOS according to ESPN. Other than playing one or two top RPI top 50 noncon I don't know what really more they could do. For reference K-State's non conference SOS is 148.

Because their conference is so weak they should be doing  a lot more.  KSU doesn't need to because our conference is the strongest in the nation.  Check out this comparison.  KSU played the same number of top 50 teams in the RPI that WSU did.  Pretty telling honestly.

http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketball/bracketology/team-comparison/KSTATE/WICHST

Offline emawmason

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 33
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #366 on: February 27, 2014, 12:16:17 PM »
I consider myself a casual fan of WSU but the majority of their fanbase has a horrible case of little man syndrome. Like makes KU fans seem super relaxed and confident and lacking a need for validation. It would almost be worth it to add them as a basketball only member just for the BBSing gold that would ensue.


Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #367 on: February 27, 2014, 01:17:37 PM »

Offline Sandstone Outcropping

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11041
  • a punk who rarely ever took advice
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #368 on: February 27, 2014, 01:22:02 PM »

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45938
  • big roas man
    • View Profile

Offline Trogdor

  • Hoodcat
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2985
    • View Profile
@Trogdor_gE

Offline HerrSonntag

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3443
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #372 on: February 27, 2014, 11:19:49 PM »

Offline XocolateThundarr

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5298
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #373 on: February 28, 2014, 08:37:01 AM »
@mikec2w

Offline #LIFE

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1792
    • View Profile
Re: Shockers
« Reply #374 on: February 28, 2014, 12:22:00 PM »
I would love to see Ku v. WSU in the tourney.  KU would dive bomb them by 10 or more.

 :surprised: