Author Topic: big play waters  (Read 9175 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5624
    • View Profile
big play waters
« on: November 23, 2013, 12:25:21 PM »
.


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Online steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88576
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: big play waters
« Reply #1 on: November 23, 2013, 12:30:33 PM »
STUD!

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: big play waters
« Reply #2 on: November 23, 2013, 12:40:27 PM »
He's throwing some great balls, but he's also benefiting substantially from having the best receiver in K-State's history. Lockett is probably the biggest reason Waters had to play this season, and Snyds, I'm guessing, knew that all along.
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10178
    • View Profile
Re: big play waters
« Reply #3 on: November 23, 2013, 12:53:20 PM »
He's throwing some great balls, but he's also benefiting substantially from having the best receiver in K-State's history. Lockett is probably the biggest reason Waters had to play this season, and Snyds, I'm guessing, knew that all along.

I think more people than Snyds knew that

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: big play waters
« Reply #4 on: November 23, 2013, 01:06:56 PM »
He's throwing some great balls, but he's also benefiting substantially from having the best receiver in K-State's history. Lockett is probably the biggest reason Waters had to play this season, and Snyds, I'm guessing, knew that all along.

I think more people than Snyds knew that

I Was One Of Them.
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: big play waters
« Reply #5 on: November 23, 2013, 01:29:45 PM »
He's throwing some great balls, but he's also benefiting substantially from having the best receiver in K-State's history. Lockett is probably the biggest reason Waters had to play this season, and Snyds, I'm guessing, knew that all along.

http://goEMAW.com/blog/?p=3048

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67445
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: big play waters
« Reply #6 on: November 23, 2013, 02:00:07 PM »
Lol @waters.

Sams wins this game.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: big play waters
« Reply #7 on: November 23, 2013, 02:11:54 PM »
He's throwing some great balls, but he's also benefiting substantially from having the best receiver in K-State's history. Lockett is probably the biggest reason Waters had to play this season, and Snyds, I'm guessing, knew that all along.

http://goEMAW.com/blog/?p=3048

A loss is a loss. This game had a lot of similarities to that one. Not enough balance on offense.

Offline bozocat

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 207
    • View Profile
Re: big play waters
« Reply #8 on: November 23, 2013, 02:18:53 PM »
Lol @waters.

Sams wins this game.

No, not this one

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10178
    • View Profile
Re: big play waters
« Reply #9 on: November 23, 2013, 02:20:58 PM »
Lol @waters.

Sams wins this game.

You've never looked like a bigger idiot

Offline yoEMAW

  • The Engineer
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 839
    • View Profile
Re: big play waters
« Reply #10 on: November 23, 2013, 02:21:56 PM »
 :flush:

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67445
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: big play waters
« Reply #11 on: November 23, 2013, 02:22:42 PM »
Do you even watch the games?

Waters has been terrible today, and is extremely lucky that Lockett is such a gigantic stud.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10178
    • View Profile
Re: big play waters
« Reply #12 on: November 23, 2013, 02:24:18 PM »
Do you even watch the games?

Waters has been terrible today, and is extremely lucky that Lockett is such a gigantic stud.

Terrible? How exactly?

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67445
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: big play waters
« Reply #13 on: November 23, 2013, 02:27:22 PM »
Guess you didn't watch the game.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10178
    • View Profile
Re: big play waters
« Reply #14 on: November 23, 2013, 02:29:52 PM »
Guess you didn't watch the game.

Sound argument  :jerk:

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: big play waters
« Reply #15 on: November 23, 2013, 02:30:24 PM »
Waters was awful.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38079
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: big play waters
« Reply #16 on: November 23, 2013, 02:31:47 PM »
#TeamUnderthrowOverthrow

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55959
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: big play waters
« Reply #17 on: November 23, 2013, 02:43:26 PM »
I've said it several times before, but Waters is far better than Waters at throwing deep balls. Sams is far better at everything else.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: big play waters
« Reply #18 on: November 23, 2013, 02:46:08 PM »
I've said it several times before, but Waters is far better than Waters at throwing deep balls. Sams is far better at everything else.

The real problem is that Waters isn't even competent at anything else. Consistency is the most important thing for an offense to have and you just aren't going to consistently get receivers wide open deep down the field.

Offline UCHADBRO

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 205
    • View Profile
Re: big play waters
« Reply #19 on: November 23, 2013, 02:49:39 PM »
Every one of our losses has a common denominator. In our losses we did not use a balanced QB rotation, whether it be Sams or Waters receiving the majority of the snaps. Just my observation.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55959
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: big play waters
« Reply #20 on: November 23, 2013, 02:50:05 PM »
I've said it several times before, but Waters is far better than Waters at throwing deep balls. Sams is far better at everything else.

The real problem is that Waters isn't even competent at anything else. Consistency is the most important thing for an offense to have and you just aren't going to consistently get receivers wide open deep down the field.

But our coaches panic if there's any kind of deficit and think they need to get it all back in one play. It worked against tcu and the first half today, but as we saw, you can't expect those plays to be there reliably.

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10178
    • View Profile
Re: big play waters
« Reply #21 on: November 23, 2013, 02:52:48 PM »
I thought his intermediate passing was good. I thought what killed him today was a drop by Sexton and multiple drops by TT. Which led to punts. I understand that if you have a good passing QB and no receivers you shouldn't go with a passing QB. Thing is, I believe we do have good receivers, and that TT and Sexton make those catches 99% of the time.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55959
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: big play waters
« Reply #22 on: November 23, 2013, 02:53:36 PM »
I thought his intermediate passing was good. I thought what killed him today was a drop by Sexton and multiple drops by TT. Which led to punts. I understand that if you have a good passing QB and no receivers you shouldn't go with a passing QB. Thing is, I believe we do have good receivers, and that TT and Sexton make those catches 99% of the time.

thanks, torrel

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: big play waters
« Reply #23 on: November 23, 2013, 02:54:22 PM »
I thought his intermediate passing was good. I thought what killed him today was a drop by Sexton and multiple drops by TT. Which led to punts. I understand that if you have a good passing QB and no receivers you shouldn't go with a passing QB. Thing is, I believe we do have good receivers, and that TT and Sexton make those catches 99% of the time.

They don't drop those passes if they aren't over their heads and behind their back. Basically, they don't drop those passes if they are thrown by Daniel Sams.

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10178
    • View Profile
Re: big play waters
« Reply #24 on: November 23, 2013, 02:56:59 PM »
I thought his intermediate passing was good. I thought what killed him today was a drop by Sexton and multiple drops by TT. Which led to punts. I understand that if you have a good passing QB and no receivers you shouldn't go with a passing QB. Thing is, I believe we do have good receivers, and that TT and Sexton make those catches 99% of the time.

They don't drop those passes if they aren't over their heads and behind their back. Basically, they don't drop those passes if they are thrown by Daniel Sams.

One hit TT in the numbers. Sexton's was an easy grab too. He did have a few high throws, but no one else was around so they should have been caught.