yes, the last thing we would want to do is use his overall record. instead, it makes way more sense to use arbitrary statistics which fit the agenda of hating oscar. agree 100% go cats.
so weird. i swear to god he said he was just using his last four years at illinois. wow. go to bed daris.
either way, i'd say it's pretty dumb to just use numbers and not allow some kind of human interpretation of those numbers. oh well time will tell. go ksuuuuu.
ok so he said he expects oscar to repeat his last four illinois seasons over and over again at ksu cats and that he's ok w/ it. why didn't he say five? hell i don't know. maybe because it's because oscar went 5-13 in conference that year.
also, he just went .500 in conference in those last four and missed the tourney twice. oh well gosp doesn't care that much about bball i guess. that's his deal though not mine.
Look I think you realized in your second post that I used his all-time winning percentage,
not just any four years, to calculate my prediction for this season. Then I looked at our schedule and thought it was doable.
Longer term, I didn't include the 07-08 season results in my career prediction because it was an outlier. (The only overall losing season in Weber's 15-year career.) But likewise, I'm not predicting Weber wins the Big 12 every year and maintains the new all-time winning percentage record at KSU, even though his most recent season -- and only season at his current school -- statistically indicates he might. Again, last year was a bit of an outlier. So I went with the four seasons right before that as fitting into his mean.
Maybe oscar will go 16-19 (5-13) every year from now on at KSU and suck taints and dongs and all those other things steve dave usually lists. But if so, it would be a major downward deviation from his pattern. (And I wouldn't be okay with that, which is why I didn't say I would be okay with that.)
Am I okay with this career at KSU? Yeah, I guess I said I would be. Maybe that makes me a crappy fan.
27-8 (14-4), conference title, NCAA
24-11 (11-7), NCAA
21–15 (10–8), NIT Quarterfinals
20–14 (9–9), NCAA Round of 32
17–15 (6–12)
24–10 (11–7), NCAA
21–15 (10–8), NIT Quarterfinals
20–14 (9–9), NCAA Round of 32
17–15 (6–12)
I think he might actually do better than that, and that's based on big breakout years he's had (28-8, 27-8, 26-7, 24-7, 37-2). But that's more along the lines of wishful thinking. Anyway, go cats.
