Don't fall into the "both sides are equally intransigent" talking point. One side is causing all of the problems, and it's by design. They've spent a lot of money on think tanks trying to figure out how to essentially break the government. They are mainly motivated by the fear of growing entitlements and environmental regulation. Democrats try to do something you don't like? Just control enough of the government to hold it hostage and get your way.
I don't recall seeing anything saying that one side was urgently and continually requesting the other come to the middle to discuss and negotiate any major issue. They both continually stiff arm each other and suck.
What middle is there? Either they fund a law that was passed by both houses or they don't. What's the middle ground on that?
nothing ever gets passed on it's own merits. There is always a deal on another issue, a rider, etc.
Also, the budget. They both want one, but neither wants the other's idea of what it should be and both have declared that the aren't budging on some of the inclusions/requirements. "We will not increase taxes one bit" vs "We will not cut public service programs"
Can't have it both ways and both declare they won't budge on their stance.
Rather than giving and taking, they end up doing nothing and then we shut down.
