Author Topic: Assessment of Waters  (Read 8559 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ira Hayes

  • Created #RayRayForAD
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1985
  • The Marine that went to war.
    • View Profile
Re: Assessment of Waters
« Reply #25 on: August 30, 2013, 11:51:05 PM »
I thought Waters actually played pretty well. Should never have thrown the INT in-bounds, but it shows it was his 1st game. Much more disappointed in the o-line than in Waters. You can bash him all you want, but the lack of any run game showed that the line just wasn't there tonight. If we get more consistent line play, and w/ a few games' more experience, Waters will do very well.

Waters made the OLine look bad.  There is a reason a group of returners were great last year and bad this year.  The only variable is QB play.

Never ever heard anyone say that the QB made his oline look bad. Ever. How is that possible?

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37959
    • View Profile
Re: Assessment of Waters
« Reply #26 on: August 30, 2013, 11:52:42 PM »
I thought Waters actually played pretty well. Should never have thrown the INT in-bounds, but it shows it was his 1st game. Much more disappointed in the o-line than in Waters. You can bash him all you want, but the lack of any run game showed that the line just wasn't there tonight. If we get more consistent line play, and w/ a few games' more experience, Waters will do very well.

Waters made the OLine look bad.  There is a reason a group of returners were great last year and bad this year.  The only variable is QB play.

Never ever heard anyone say that the QB made his oline look bad. Ever. How is that possible?

Obviously you have never watched Jeff George or Jake Waters play the game of football.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Assessment of Waters
« Reply #27 on: August 30, 2013, 11:53:54 PM »
I thought Waters actually played pretty well. Should never have thrown the INT in-bounds, but it shows it was his 1st game. Much more disappointed in the o-line than in Waters. You can bash him all you want, but the lack of any run game showed that the line just wasn't there tonight. If we get more consistent line play, and w/ a few games' more experience, Waters will do very well.

Waters made the OLine look bad.  There is a reason a group of returners were great last year and bad this year.  The only variable is QB play.

Never ever heard anyone say that the QB made his oline look bad. Ever. How is that possible?

b/c waters sucks, thats how.  i swear that 90% of the people that post here are legally blind b/c there is no way that you could have watched the game tonight and not understand what _33 is saying.

Offline kostakio

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 475
    • View Profile
Re: Assessment of Waters
« Reply #28 on: August 30, 2013, 11:57:36 PM »
I think waters was ok.  We are still figuring out what this offense needs to be.  My guess is we will get it figured out at some point and be pretty good on offense.  We commonly look lke crap on offense in the first game.  More then anything i think bill just has to figure out what he wants to do.  If waters is the guy you have to commit to throwing the football.  If you don't want to do that then you have to play SAMs.  Either way I see it getting fixed but unfortunately the defense is another story and I don't see any potential answers there.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22431
    • View Profile
Re: Assessment of Waters
« Reply #29 on: August 30, 2013, 11:58:40 PM »
I thought Waters actually played pretty well. Should never have thrown the INT in-bounds, but it shows it was his 1st game. Much more disappointed in the o-line than in Waters. You can bash him all you want, but the lack of any run game showed that the line just wasn't there tonight. If we get more consistent line play, and w/ a few games' more experience, Waters will do very well.

Waters made the OLine look bad.  There is a reason a group of returners were great last year and bad this year.  The only variable is QB play.

Never ever heard anyone say that the QB made his oline look bad. Ever. How is that possible?

What they mean is that he failed to make his oline look amazing.  You know, the way Sams would have.  Because we decided long ago that, no matter what else happens, Sams makes this team the best in the history of college football when he is on the field.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37959
    • View Profile
Re: Assessment of Waters
« Reply #30 on: August 30, 2013, 11:59:39 PM »
I think waters was ok.  We are still figuring out what this offense needs to be.  My guess is we will get it figured out at some point and be pretty good on offense.  We commonly look lke crap on offense in the first game.  More then anything i think bill just has to figure out what he wants to do.  If waters is the guy you have to commit to throwing the football.  If you don't want to do that then you have to play SAMs.  Either way I see it getting fixed but unfortunately the defense is another story and I don't see any potential answers there.

If you run the football you can have 9 minute drives like NDSU did to end the game. That makes your defense look a whole lot better.

Offline cDubya

  • Coal Grab'r
  • Katpak'r
  • *
  • Posts: 2641
  • KCCO
    • View Profile
Re: Assessment of Waters
« Reply #31 on: August 31, 2013, 12:01:31 AM »
you know it's a bad loss when the hoopies are offering Ts and Ps   :drink:

Im going to take the high road,  and instead of adding insult to injury,  I'll just say cheers.

 :cheers:


Offline j-von

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1632
  • Hates The Band
    • View Profile
Re: Assessment of Waters
« Reply #32 on: August 31, 2013, 12:01:43 AM »
The fact is that it's silly to make any definitive statements at this point.  Bill now has a track record of not having players ready for the first game or last game of the season.

Klein squeaked out a 10-7 win vs. Eastern Kentucky 2 years ago in the opener.  Waters went 21/29 for 280 yards.  He may not be the answer for this team, but judging by past seasons, I'm not sure if we really know who this team is yet.

Offline HELLHAMMER

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1374
  • BO DARVILLE'S STUNT DOUBLE
    • View Profile
Re: Assessment of Waters
« Reply #33 on: August 31, 2013, 12:06:01 AM »
Waters is dog crap guys.  My eyes don't lie to me.  Ever.
High on Crack, Toting a Machine Gun

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21355
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: Assessment of Waters
« Reply #34 on: August 31, 2013, 12:13:06 AM »
Waters is dog crap guys.  My eyes don't lie to me.  Ever.

my eyes saw my boy Daniel get the ball and then instantly score a touchdown.

Offline Berries and Cream

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 174
    • View Profile
Re: Assessment of Waters
« Reply #35 on: August 31, 2013, 01:16:44 AM »
Recent history would make one consider that Snyder is one of the best week-to-week coaches in existence and one of the worst out there when given a lot of time.

See every first game of the season since his return and bowl game since forever.

Does he overthink things? No idea. But the bottom line is our beloved K-State Cats stink when Snyder and co have a lot of time to prepare for the opponent.

That being said, I don't know what everyone is possibly debating. The o-line was awful and Waters wasn't very good beyond a few throws.

#life

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: Assessment of Waters
« Reply #36 on: August 31, 2013, 01:25:32 AM »
Waters is dog crap guys.  My eyes don't lie to me.  Ever.

my eyes saw my boy Daniel get the ball and then instantly score a touchdown.

It's interesting how he does that.

Offline Pett

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4250
  • KLI GOD
    • View Profile
Re: Assessment of Waters
« Reply #37 on: August 31, 2013, 02:13:32 AM »
Waters is exactly what we thought he would be. Great passer, so-so runner. He had an extreme case of happy feet in tonight's game (maybe nerves). Not to mention he had about three seconds to get rid of the ball before pressure was in his face

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37959
    • View Profile
Re: Assessment of Waters
« Reply #38 on: August 31, 2013, 02:16:58 AM »
Waters is exactly what we thought he would be. Great passer, so-so runner. He had an extreme case of happy feet in tonight's game (maybe nerves). Not to mention he had about three seconds to get rid of the ball before pressure was in his face

3 seconds is all you can reasonably expect. Anything more than that is really good protection.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45929
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: Assessment of Waters
« Reply #39 on: August 31, 2013, 02:43:08 AM »
I thought Waters actually played pretty well. Should never have thrown the INT in-bounds, but it shows it was his 1st game. Much more disappointed in the o-line than in Waters. You can bash him all you want, but the lack of any run game showed that the line just wasn't there tonight. If we get more consistent line play, and w/ a few games' more experience, Waters will do very well.

Waters made the OLine look bad.  There is a reason a group of returners were great last year and bad this year.  The only variable is QB play.

Never ever heard anyone say that the QB made his oline look bad. Ever. How is that possible?

Bad checks, bad reads, holding the ball too long, and happy feet are all things that can make an O line look bad. First year CK hung his O line out a lot because he refused to throw the ball away.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45929
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: Assessment of Waters
« Reply #40 on: August 31, 2013, 02:46:57 AM »
Waters is exactly what we thought he would be. Great passer, so-so runner. He had an extreme case of happy feet in tonight's game (maybe nerves). Not to mention he had about three seconds to get rid of the ball before pressure was in his face

3 seconds is all you can reasonably expect. Anything more than that is really good protection.

This is correct. As it comes to a pass rush and pass protection I think the lines are getting too much grief. NDSU used a ton of three and five step drops. The QB didn't have the ball very long, they were perfectly content with 5 yard hitches, back shoulder throws, and quick slants. I'm not quite sure what we were doing with Waters.

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: Assessment of Waters
« Reply #41 on: August 31, 2013, 02:54:38 AM »
It honestly doesn't matter what we think of Waters.  Sams needs to play because it's the only way we are going to get production out of Hubert.  We have to have his running ability to open up opportunities for others.  Also, due to the defense, we are gonna need to drain clock.

Sams needs to start by Texas.

Offline GoodForAnother

  • It was all a scheme I used to read emaw magazine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6045
  • You hate to see this Mike
    • View Profile
Re: Assessment of Waters
« Reply #42 on: August 31, 2013, 02:56:16 AM »
Waters is dog crap guys.  My eyes don't lie to me.  Ever.

my eyes saw my boy Daniel get the ball and then instantly score a touchdown.

he also got tackled later for no gain, fyi
emaw

Offline DOD Take 2

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 694
  • Corndogs Jackie! Corndogs for all these people!
    • View Profile
Re: Assessment of Waters
« Reply #43 on: August 31, 2013, 03:26:44 AM »
I thought Waters actually played pretty well. Should never have thrown the INT in-bounds, but it shows it was his 1st game. Much more disappointed in the o-line than in Waters. You can bash him all you want, but the lack of any run game showed that the line just wasn't there tonight. If we get more consistent line play, and w/ a few games' more experience, Waters will do very well.

Waters made the OLine look bad.  There is a reason a group of returners were great last year and bad this year.  The only variable is QB play.

Never ever heard anyone say that the QB made his oline look bad. Ever. How is that possible?

Bad checks, bad reads, holding the ball too long, and happy feet are all things that can make an O line look bad. First year CK hung his O line out a lot because he refused to throw the ball away.

This. I saw him get good passing protection on most downs. He just wants to hold it too long and make a play. NDSU also blitzed quite a bit. I know a couple of those blitzes we didn't have enough guys to block them all, and Waters either didn't have a safety valve on the play or didn't utilize them. He should have been making checks with his receivers to expose the blitzes.

Offline ELL3

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 775
    • View Profile
Re: Assessment of Waters
« Reply #44 on: August 31, 2013, 04:40:36 AM »
He is (I think) the best white QB so he will keep the job
Since coming back ZERO black QB starts for Bill 

Offline felix rex

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8967
  • Knows what Brent did
    • View Profile
Re: Assessment of Waters
« Reply #45 on: August 31, 2013, 06:16:39 AM »
loser
"How will I recruit to Manhattan? Well, distance. And the proud state of basketball. It start there, and then daily flights to Dallas, because I'm really good at going out. Like top five good. Ask my wife. She wants me to be happy."

Offline timhawk

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1929
    • View Profile
Re: Assessment of Waters
« Reply #46 on: August 31, 2013, 06:50:40 AM »
Waters went 21-29 for 280 yards with 2 TD and 2 INT, that's not a bad game at all, pretty accurate if you ask me. you guys really need to be talking crap about Hubert...10 carries for 23 yards. and he is 1st team big 12 ahead of James Sims? lmao
everyone is jealous

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22431
    • View Profile
Re: Assessment of Waters
« Reply #47 on: August 31, 2013, 06:58:42 AM »
Hubert's playing just fine.  He doesn't have a backup beloved by goEMAW, so I don't know what more you can expect out of him.

Offline timhawk

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1929
    • View Profile
Re: Assessment of Waters
« Reply #48 on: August 31, 2013, 07:06:42 AM »
Hubert's playing just fine.  He doesn't have a backup beloved by goEMAW, so I don't know what more you can expect out of him.

lol 10 carries for 23 yards is not "fine"
everyone is jealous

Offline Perry

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 444
    • View Profile
Re: Assessment of Waters
« Reply #49 on: August 31, 2013, 07:24:35 AM »
Because Hubert had so many holes to run through, right? He was smothered on most of those carries.