Since when has being innovative ever killed an economy?
Green "innovation" accounts for 6% of the U.S. total energy consumption . . . this has nothing to do with innovation. We are going up against economies and governments who talk a good game and do the exact opposite, the Paris Accord is utterly worthless.
It has everything to do with innovation.
If you think you're going to come anywhere close to driving the power needs of the economy using green "innovation" then you're insane, we're literally decades away from "zero emission" energy being anywhere close to meeting the power needs of the U.S. economy, there's still a 94% gap to make up. LibDerp Leadership will have already sent the economy into the shitter if they get their way.
I'm curious to know what your actual argument is here. I can only assume it's that we need to do the cheap and easy thing by burning more fossil fuels like India and China otherwise our economy will crater, because that's what you said. But I'm not interested if it's only "The Paris Accord sucks!"
Look at the desires of individuals in your own party. If they get their way, they'll crater the whole deal long before renewable will come close to maintaining the economic engine that exists today.
Let's look at another thing, auto emissions. You've got states like California passing all kinds of draconian green laws while lower classes have to fight their way through shittyy mass transit systems that have seen ridership drop 25% in the last decade because the systems suck so bad. Thus more cars than ever are on the roads in California.
Yet, rather than concentrate on urban mass transit Moon Beam spent billions on the train to no where.
