The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread

[DaBigTrain]

Speaking of useful idiots

Climate change: hoax or no hoax?

[sonofdaxjones]

Speaking of useful idiots

Climate change: hoax or no hoax?

The climate has always changed and always will change.   

We now have climate "scientists" writing scary papers where they now use such scientific words as "belief".

[DaBigTrain]

Speaking of useful idiots

Climate change: hoax or no hoax?

The climate has always changed and always will change.   

We now have climate "scientists" writing scary papers where they now use such scientific words as "belief".

Dax a yes or no question is the easiest of any question to answer.  There’s no other context needed.  Is man made climate change a hoax or not?

[sonofdaxjones]

Speaking of useful idiots

Climate change: hoax or no hoax?

The climate has always changed and always will change.   

We now have climate "scientists" writing scary papers where they now use such scientific words as "belief".

Dax a yes or no question is the easiest of any question to answer.  There’s no other context needed.  Is man made climate change a hoax or not?

LOL, your own favorite scientists can't answer that question, and always manage to leave a lot of open ended-ness to every belief-conclusion, which translates into . . . . we need more money.

The AGW is not the cataclysmic event that alarmist say that it is, but if you want me to say that man is impacting the environment than, yes.   Ever since man has existed.

But, you're too stupid to get that.

[DaBigTrain]

Speaking of useful idiots

Climate change: hoax or no hoax?

The climate has always changed and always will change.   

We now have climate "scientists" writing scary papers where they now use such scientific words as "belief".

Dax a yes or no question is the easiest of any question to answer.  There’s no other context needed.  Is man made climate change a hoax or not?

LOL, your own favorite scientists can't answer that question, and always manage to leave a lot of open ended-ness to every belief-conclusion, which translates into . . . . we need more money.

The AGW is not the cataclysmic event that alarmist say that it is, but if you want me to say that man is impacting the environment than, yes.   Ever since man has existed.

But, you're too stupid to get that.

Good grief.  Thank you for at least answering.

So in light of this, did pre-industrial revolution people impact it more or less than post-industrial revolution?

Or is it your opinion when we were hunter-gathers we impacted it the same as we do today?

[sonofdaxjones]

Here's a perfect example The Big Tuck:

“Arctic Amplification is consistent with computer models, simulating the response to increasing greenhouse gas concentrations. However, the underlying physical processes for the intensified warming still remain elusive. 

Using complex computer simulations, the scientists were able to disprove previously suggested hypotheses, that emphasized the role of transport of heat from the tropics to the poles as one of the key contributors to the amplified warming in the Arctic.
[/b]
“Our study clearly shows that local carbon dioxide forcing and polar feedbacks are most effective in Arctic amplification compared to other processes”, says Assistant Project Leader Malte F. Stuecker, the corresponding author of the study.”

Translation:  We don't really know anything more now, than we did before the study.   But we're going to make you believe that we're on to something so we can get more money.   Not only that, there's huge debate as to whether you can even call it "intensified warming" . . intensified warming relative to what?   For how long?  When?   But this the game that's played, and AGW zealots get all pissy when just as smart people as these "scientists" start picking these things apart. 

https://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/190661.php

[mocat]

 

[CHONGS]

If Trump says it's a hoax, dax knows it's a hoax.

[DaBigTrain]

Just as I believe humans are contributing to climate change because I defer to the consensus among those who study it.

This is a hard divergence from Trumpism that Dax should consider. 

[treysolid]

wow dax, your scientific literacy is complete ass. you couldn't be more wrong about your interpretation of the text that you bolded.

hugs and kisses,

treysolid (actual scientist)

[sonofdaxjones]

“Regional green house gasses”. LOL, WTF?

[sonofdaxjones]

wow dax, your scientific literacy is complete ass. you couldn't be more wrong about your interpretation of the text that you bolded.

hugs and kisses,

treysolid (actual scientist)

Not really. 

[treysolid]

“Regional green house gasses”. LOL, WTF?

Don't ridicule a hypothesis just because you don't know about carbon and methane release from thawing permafrost.

[bucket]

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1090074254010404864

[star seed 7]

Don "teach me how to" trump

[sonofdaxjones]

Somebody let Don know that the "Polar Vortex" aka Winter, is also part of the Global Warming Initiative. 

[sonofdaxjones]

PG&E green energy "leader" filing bankruptcy (still want to pay $180 million in bonuses though) . . . maybe if they'd put more money in maintaining those power lines (in a geographic region of the world that has experienced droughts that have lasted decades even centuries over the course of world history . . . and was never meant to support tens of millions of people) instead of "investing" in "green" energy, they wouldn't be facing $30 billion in liabilities.

[sonofdaxjones]

https://carnegiescience.edu/news/china-not-walking-walk-methane-emissions

But they signed the Paris Agreement!!!

[catastrophe]

Good point about how there is no downside to staying in the Paris accords Dax.

[sonofdaxjones]

Good point about how there is no downside to staying in the Paris accords Dax.

Translation:  Meaningless . . . a futile, purely symbolic gesture

[bucket]

Good point about how there is no downside to staying in the Paris accords Dax.

Translation:  Meaningless . . . a futile, purely symbolic gesture

https://twitter.com/latimes/status/1089336109685985280

[sonofdaxjones]

Good point about how there is no downside to staying in the Paris accords Dax.

Translation:  Meaningless . . . a futile, purely symbolic gesture

https://twitter.com/latimes/status/1089336109685985280

Great propaganda, but they were talking about that before the Paris Agreement even existed and won't come close to offsetting China's onslaught of growing emissions.

[catastrophe]

Good point about how there is no downside to staying in the Paris accords Dax.

Translation:  Meaningless . . . a futile, purely symbolic gesture

FYI - like most of foreign policy is symbolic gestures.

[sonofdaxjones]

Elon "fossil fuels are the dumbest experiment in human history" Musk logged 159K miles in calendar year 2018 on his Gulfstream 650

Gallons of Fuel Burned Per Hour of Flight Time at Cruising Speed/Altitude:  500 gph


Congrats Elon, keep pouring through that investor money, and don't forget that pending Tesla debt payment.

[wetwillie]

Eat crap Elon!