0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The subject matter of the quotes is the usefulness of the models. You say that's been proven wrong. I guess that fits the thread title, but not your haphazard kitchen sink posts in this thread.You should strive to become coherent.
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting
Quotes have no expiration date, and Parrot Boy Whackadoodle apparently doesn't realize that it's modeling that's driving the draconian climate/energy decisions along with the constant meddling in historical temperature data.
I know Parrot Boy Whackadoodle won't like this because it's not from one of his far left preapproved propaganda sources, but this just outlines one small segment of the witch hunt that's undertaken against scientists who don't tow the line.http://blog.heartland.org/2016/04/a-few-facts-for-climate-alarmists-waging-war-against-astrophysicist-willie-soon/
in the end, EMAW will always win.
Non-bias research from multiple funding sources from around the world =
It's all a big conspiracy
Biased big oil "research" = Non-bias research from multiple funding sources from around the world =
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/jun/13/peabody-energy-coal-mining-climate-change-denial-fundingNothing really new here but...
Funding research is different than funding lobbyists.
Quote from: bubbles4ksu on June 13, 2016, 03:24:19 PMFunding research is different than funding lobbyists.Then why are they all lumped together? Do you not think the opposing side has lobbyists?Royals aren't gonna win 'em all