I disagree with everything but the "don't try to be different" advice. Music and art are constantly evolving and thinking "outside the box" can be a positive in any faction of life. the fact is, it hasn't all been done before.
(ot: someone invent a new term for "outside the box".)
and yes, technology is the catalyst for new ideas. It has been since the dawn of mankind. There are so many new tools available to people that weren't even a year ago that the possibilities of non-recycled ideas is incredible and truly unprecedented in history.
Art and science are so closely related to me (as both an artist and a scientist). I'm a writer just as much as I am a scientist. The beauty in both is unquesioned in my eyes. I'm not debating innovation in technology/music/art. My point is that societies processing and use of those applications remains the same. Take the bubonic plague as an example. Scientists invented a "new" cure for the disease, the world changed. Now let's look at AIDS, the "new" treatments for AIDS are amazing and have extended life as a result (similar to Penicilin and the bubonic plague). Though both are innovative/novel, the acclimation by society is the same. To quote Jean-Baptiste Alphonse Karr: "the more things change the more they stay the same." I side with him. I agree that I overstated that everything has beed done before, but to someone young I think it takes a great deal of stress away from the creative process in an effort to just experience, think, reflect and grow. My point was that young people shouldn't be afraid of who they are as there has been many people who were different yet similar to them that came before them. My argument should have been stated such that societys' response to novel changes is quite similar.
Was the printing press acclimated by society the same way as the internet, or mobile data the same way as the typewriter? Even if it was, why on Earth would that make originality "bullshit"?
It sounds like you're saying people shouldn't try to be creative. I would encourage everyone to be creative as long as they can learn from their failures. Sure, many will fail, but that's part of being imperfect, constantly learning, and living in the moment, right?
And I would say Karr is correct in that humanity has been progressing at unprecedented rates since the invention of language, but not in the sense that creativity is dead.