We are a four seed, and Wisconsin is the five in our region.

[michigancat]

If past results were always an accurate predictor of future results, sports would be amazing boring and not at all worth watching.

Ever watched a KU/K-State game?

I'm having a hard time with the point here, would appreciate some help.

3-47

were we favored in any of those?

was missouri?

Missouri has a dogshit record against them over that time, too. so did everyone in the world.

[k-state87]

http://news.turner.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=6344

^Looks like the game will be on TruTv after the Wisconsin-Ole Miss game, so 1:40ish (CT) Albert/Kerr//Sager

[Katpappy]

We will trash these clowns, losers. Trash.

Which ones; the Wisconsin/Ole Miss winner or the TBO at hand? 

[JavaCat]

Bruesewitz only scored 17 points in 83 minutes versus oscar. We got this.

[catzacker]

If past results were always an accurate predictor of future results, sports would be amazing boring and not at all worth watching.

Ever watched a KU/K-State game?

I'm having a hard time with the point here, would appreciate some help.

3-47

were we favored in any of those?

was missouri?

Missouri has a dogshit record against them over that time, too. so did everyone in the world.

over their last 50 games, 16-34.  MU was ranked higher than KU during that stretch 3 times.  They mustered up the sack to win 1 in 3 (once every 2 years), we've mustered enough to win 1 every 16 (once every 8).  We're beyond pathetic.

It's more embarassing to play the game than it would be to petition the conference to have those games forfeited every year.

[kim carnes]

If past results were always an accurate predictor of future results, sports would be amazing boring and not at all worth watching.

Ever watched a KU/K-State game?

I'm having a hard time with the point here, would appreciate some help.

3-47

were we favored in any of those?

was missouri?

Missouri has a dogshit record against them over that time, too. so did everyone in the world.

over their last 50 games, 16-34.  MU was ranked higher than KU during that stretch 3 times.  They mustered up the sack to win 1 in 3 (once every 2 years), we've mustered enough to win 1 every 16 (once every 8).  We're beyond pathetic.

It's more embarassing to play the game than it would be to petition the conference to have those games forfeited every year.

missouri has had better teams than us over that timeframe

[catzacker]

Sure, MU was better.  MU went to the tourney 15x during that time period (89-12), we've gone to 10 (including this year).  The unexplainable disparity still exists. 

[MixBerryCrunch]

If past results were always an accurate predictor of future results, sports would be amazing boring and not at all worth watching.

Ever watched a KU/K-State game?

I'm having a hard time with the point here, would appreciate some help.

3-47

were we favored in any of those?

was missouri?

Missouri has a dogshit record against them over that time, too. so did everyone in the world.

over their last 50 games, 16-34.  MU was ranked higher than KU during that stretch 3 times.  They mustered up the sack to win 1 in 3 (once every 2 years), we've mustered enough to win 1 every 16 (once every 8).  We're beyond pathetic.

It's more embarassing to play the game than it would be to petition the conference to have those games forfeited every year.

It's a mental thing because our dumbass fans put so much damn pressure on them to win the game. I'm surprised they aren't having anxiety attacks on the court.

[catzacker]

hey guys, this college basketball thing is just too much pressure.  let's just pat them on the back.  3-47?  Hey, they tried hard, we just pressured them too much.  shower up and let's get some chicken nuggets.

[SleepFighter]

#superbowl

[MixBerryCrunch]

hey guys, this college basketball thing is just too much pressure.  let's just pat them on the back.  3-47?  Hey, they tried hard, we just pressured them too much.  shower up and let's get some chicken nuggets.

Zackster just doesn't get it. It's ok, you have an agenda and you don't let pesky things like common sense get in the way of it. 'Grats for that.

[MakeItRain]

Jesus Christ. Kansas is really in the heads of some of you. Are we going to be talking about them in every thread for the next two weeks?

[EMAWmeister]

I don't give a crap about Kansas as we won't see them for the rest of the season. I'm not sure why some of you still do.

[Panjandrum]

Sure, MU was better.  MU went to the tourney 15x during that time period (89-12), we've gone to 10 (including this year).  The unexplainable disparity still exists.

Missouri never completely gave up on basketball for about 15 years.

We did.

[catzacker]

hey guys, this college basketball thing is just too much pressure.  let's just pat them on the back.  3-47?  Hey, they tried hard, we just pressured them too much.  shower up and let's get some chicken nuggets.

Zackster just doesn't get it. It's ok, you have an agenda and you don't let pesky things like common sense get in the way of it. 'Grats for that.

no, I just like my vaginas on women, not on my men's basketball team.  that's just me.

[michigancat]

we've won more than three times against Kansas since 1989.

[wabash909]

A Wisconsin thread devolves into a KU cry fest. Kansas City posters are easy to spot. Sorry about work tomorrow, bros. Just fire all of the squaks who run their mouths, you can find more housekeepers and mail clerks.

Don't be silly.  KU is simply the most obvious example of "past results being an accurate predictor of future results.". 47-50 or whatever speaks clearly for itself.

But, I suppose if the KU example makes you butthurt, it's just as easy to instead use our predictive dominance over Texas in all major sports.  Some teams/programs simply have a mental edge over other teams/programs.  I can't explain the statistical fact as to why we own Texas harder than any school in the Big XII, but I can tell you we have owned Texas and will continue to own Texas and in this case past results have been a clear indicator of future results.

[michigancat]

A Wisconsin thread devolves into a KU cry fest. Kansas City posters are easy to spot. Sorry about work tomorrow, bros. Just fire all of the squaks who run their mouths, you can find more housekeepers and mail clerks.

Don't be silly.  KU is simply the most obvious example of "past results being an accurate predictor of future results.". 47-50 or whatever speaks clearly for itself.

But, I suppose if the KU example makes you butthurt, it's just as easy to instead use our predictive dominance over Texas in all major sports.  Some teams/programs simply have a mental edge over other teams/programs.  I can't explain the statistical fact as to why we own Texas harder than any school in the Big XII, but I can tell you we have owned Texas and will continue to own Texas and in this case past results have been a clear indicator of future results.

you're 100% wrong.  well, almost. Our past "ownership" of Texas has as much effect on the future as ku's or Wisconsin's "ownership" of us. that is, none.

[bones129]

The Wisconsin fear is so rough ridin' annoying

Yes.

[wabash909]

A Wisconsin thread devolves into a KU cry fest. Kansas City posters are easy to spot. Sorry about work tomorrow, bros. Just fire all of the squaks who run their mouths, you can find more housekeepers and mail clerks.

Don't be silly.  KU is simply the most obvious example of "past results being an accurate predictor of future results.". 47-50 or whatever speaks clearly for itself.

But, I suppose if the KU example makes you butthurt, it's just as easy to instead use our predictive dominance over Texas in all major sports.  Some teams/programs simply have a mental edge over other teams/programs.  I can't explain the statistical fact as to why we own Texas harder than any school in the Big XII, but I can tell you we have owned Texas and will continue to own Texas and in this case past results have been a clear indicator of future results.

you're 100% wrong

Go on...

What's wrong, the owning Texas part or the some teams/programs having a mental edge part?

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

Back to topic, I guess Wisconsin played very good basketball in their conference tourney. I also assume they're going to out-size our 4 guard lineup by a significant margin. But is the disparity as big as it was the last two times we played them?

[pvegs]

I hope Marshall Henderson takes a giant Slim Shady dump on them and jersey pops his way into a strip club in KC and misses the game vs us due to "flu-like symptoms."

[MixBerryCrunch]

A Wisconsin thread devolves into a KU cry fest. Kansas City posters are easy to spot. Sorry about work tomorrow, bros. Just fire all of the squaks who run their mouths, you can find more housekeepers and mail clerks.

Don't be silly.  KU is simply the most obvious example of "past results being an accurate predictor of future results.". 47-50 or whatever speaks clearly for itself.

But, I suppose if the KU example makes you butthurt, it's just as easy to instead use our predictive dominance over Texas in all major sports.  Some teams/programs simply have a mental edge over other teams/programs.  I can't explain the statistical fact as to why we own Texas harder than any school in the Big XII, but I can tell you we have owned Texas and will continue to own Texas and in this case past results have been a clear indicator of future results.

you're 100% wrong

Go on...

What's wrong, the owning Texas part or the some teams/programs having a mental edge part?

2 wins is not enough to provide a mental edge; your sample size is way too small. I would say Wisconsin matches up very well with Frank Martin's type of play before I would say they have a mental edge on K-State.

[pvegs]

Wiscy matches up well vs everyone. Slow tempo, fundamentally sound, good D, can shoot the 3...that's every conceivable way to stay in games vs more talented teams.

[MakeItRain]

A Wisconsin thread devolves into a KU cry fest. Kansas City posters are easy to spot. Sorry about work tomorrow, bros. Just fire all of the squaks who run their mouths, you can find more housekeepers and mail clerks.

Don't be silly.  KU is simply the most obvious example of "past results being an accurate predictor of future results.". 47-50 or whatever speaks clearly for itself.

But, I suppose if the KU example makes you butthurt, it's just as easy to instead use our predictive dominance over Texas in all major sports.  Some teams/programs simply have a mental edge over other teams/programs.  I can't explain the statistical fact as to why we own Texas harder than any school in the Big XII, but I can tell you we have owned Texas and will continue to own Texas and in this case past results have been a clear indicator of future results.

you're 100% wrong

Go on...

What's wrong, the owning Texas part or the some teams/programs having a mental edge part?

2 wins is not enough to provide a mental edge; your sample size is way too small. I would say Wisconsin matches up very well with Frank Martin's type of play before I would say they have a mental edge on K-State.

Don't bother with logic and common sense, we have trends, curses, and the tooth fairy.