Author Topic: Rank the wildcat teams 07-13  (Read 10989 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ghost of Stan Parrish

  • I found my password
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1823
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the wildcat teams 07-13
« Reply #75 on: February 28, 2013, 09:06:51 AM »
Can you imagine if '13 Weber was coaching the '08 team!?!!   :love:

Would've been world-beaters.
"I'm thankful our MHK forefathers had the foresight to lynch white dudes so that we might be able to throw up the mob with a clear conscience."

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: Rank the wildcat teams 07-13
« Reply #76 on: February 28, 2013, 09:20:02 AM »
yeah, I'd love to see Beasley and Walker running motion offense.

Offline SPEmaw

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1041
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the wildcat teams 07-13
« Reply #77 on: February 28, 2013, 10:31:07 PM »
I think it's been shown that 2008 would murder 2011

2008 couldn't murder Texas Tech or Nebraska or a bunch of other pud teams that it lost to. I wouldn't count on anything consistent from 2008. On the other hand 2011 lost to a pud Colorado losery team 3 times so there's that.

My thinking here is that beas and bw didn't give a crap about playing puds. If we're comparing these teams against one another, I think beas, bw, and co. care enough to hand it to any of these squads. I mean, if they could beat the squawk NC team...they could beat another KSU team. Not saying that's my prediciton...but I'm not comfortable (just yet) saying that 10, 11, 12, or 13 could beat 08.
Please don't ban me, Mr. Dave.

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17876
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the wildcat teams 07-13
« Reply #78 on: February 28, 2013, 10:49:16 PM »
I figured the argument was if you put all the teams in a random identical season, who would have the best results. 08 had the biggest upside, for sure. Even 2010 couldn't beat KU, even with 3 tries.

Offline hemmy

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6676
  • RIP The After Party
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the wildcat teams 07-13
« Reply #79 on: February 28, 2013, 10:53:07 PM »
I figured the argument was if you put all the teams in a random identical season, who would have the best results. 08 had the biggest upside, for sure. Even 2010 couldn't beat KU, even with 3 tries.

TCU beat KU this year, and we did not.

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17876
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the wildcat teams 07-13
« Reply #80 on: February 28, 2013, 10:54:14 PM »
Sure, but we're KU's Super Bowl every year. They always play their best against us.

Offline SPEmaw

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1041
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the wildcat teams 07-13
« Reply #81 on: February 28, 2013, 11:39:01 PM »
OK, I'm ready.

10
08
13
11
09
07

 :dunno:
Please don't ban me, Mr. Dave.

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the wildcat teams 07-13
« Reply #82 on: March 01, 2013, 01:24:34 AM »
so I am going to go out on a limb (sarcasm) and say that the last 6 years in EMAW basketball is better than any other 6 year stretch of my life (born of December of 91)

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: Rank the wildcat teams 07-13
« Reply #83 on: March 01, 2013, 03:43:40 AM »
10
13
11
12
08
07
09

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40576
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the wildcat teams 07-13
« Reply #84 on: March 01, 2013, 06:08:44 AM »
We can all agree 07 and 09 were terrible. For the other years, I like to assume a full strength team, playing up to its potential. This makes 13 slip a bit, imo. 11 would have no Dillardsgate, and 12 no Dillonsgate. 08 could just embarrass people like crazy though. Remember losing at mizzou right after 84-75, and then later avenging that loss 100-63? 100 points in 40 mins.