Author Topic: Why not start JO?  (Read 1089 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pett

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4250
  • KLI GOD
    • View Profile
Why not start JO?
« on: January 26, 2013, 03:10:09 PM »
He plays with much more confidence when he is in the starting lineup

Maybe his injury is worse than we think


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32514
    • View Profile
Re: Why not start JO?
« Reply #1 on: January 26, 2013, 03:14:36 PM »
Probably because he isn't good at basketball
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline EMAWzified

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4244
    • View Profile
Re: Why not start JO?
« Reply #2 on: January 26, 2013, 03:16:31 PM »
Not that we have anyone in that position who is.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Why not start JO?
« Reply #3 on: January 26, 2013, 03:16:49 PM »
how many more minutes could play if he started?  15 instead of 10?  we're prolly just chasing our tails here.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline SPE_khat

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 389
    • View Profile
Re: Why not start JO?
« Reply #4 on: January 26, 2013, 03:44:27 PM »
Not athletic enough to keep up with Niang. Not like DJamer could either.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45938
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: Why not start JO?
« Reply #5 on: January 26, 2013, 04:45:54 PM »
Weird day to bring this up

Offline GetVocalwithCurt

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 122
    • View Profile
Re: Why not start JO?
« Reply #6 on: January 27, 2013, 08:36:36 AM »
oscar went with DJamer so the cats could switch on every screen
"I'll be back"
-Curtis Kelly