The problem with your argument (as best as I can tell what it is) is that its based on a false premise. You think the education budget is being reduced when in reality its being increased.
When Sebelius was governor the state had a $500m deficit, smaller education budget and less revenue. None of you nitwits thought the state was broke then and there wasn't some leftist judge ordering the state to spend more money. Brownback comes in and consolidates a bunch of government offices doing duplicative or little work, shrinking admin overhead without effecting the "benefit" and you throw a fit. Then you make allusions to services lost and picking up the tab locally with your best example being some article on boat taxes.
Sorry if you great aunt lost her 13 hr a week $36,0000 a year job in Topeka, but the state shouldn't have to pay for that. Notice I use "state" in the context of its citizens not its government. I encourage all of you to start thinking that way.
Dear chest thumping Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!):
The first court case to strike the school funding formula came when Sebelius was governor.
1 Frothing retards, like you, ie the KS legislature, were so enraged by this so called "judicial activism" they wanted to changed the way the supreme court was formed in order to attack the court.
2 This became another example of how people with diminished intellectual capacity, ie nearly the entirety of the right composing the legislature, can not handle getting their own way in matters of importance. The larger issue here for schools funding as it relates to taxes is that much of school funding is derived from property taxes.
3 That is why the school system was devastated as a result of the subprime mortgage collapse and resulting economic recession.
4 Now when it comes to Brownback and his ass hattery, we have an issue with his plan is to pay lip service to funding schools with proposals of increased funding while chopping the legs out from under the pool of funding he purposes to expand. The panel of judges clearly and emphatically castigated the legislature, and quite frankly idiots who think they can sneak this nonsense through, for their dishonesty when approaching the issue of school funding.
5 Now I don't expect you to be able to read, or even comprehend, the entire decision. But the focus in Kansas is that the legislature, since Sebelius, has consistently failed to approve a school funding formula which complies with the constitutional mandate to adequately fund the education of Kansas children. The line that you are attempting, and failing to tow, is the same anti-intellectual, lack of common sense approach, which has been plaguing the legislature since the ultra conservative forces have allied to destroy all levels of education in Kansas through the guise of lowering taxes.
1.
http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2006/jun/22/timeline_events_school_finance_lawsuit/?kansas_legislature2.
http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2006/feb/09/committee_considers_changing_selection_supreme_cou/3.
http://sitemaker.umich.edu/finaldompierre.356/how_public_schools_are_funded4.
http://www.kansascity.com/2013/01/11/4006491/court-orders-kansas-to-increase.html5.
http://www.shawneecourt.org/DocumentCenter/View/457
