How about a law practice that focuses on threatening to sue websites for unrelated youtube videos? has anyone tried that?
Good luck making any money with that when you:
1: get paid by way of premium memberships and/or pub from the client website
2: aren't getting any money from the target website because all you can really ask for is that they stop being mean to the client website, and the target website mushed the eff out of that demand anyway
Next thing you know, you'll be too broke to follow through with your $50 charitable pledges.
How about if you included vague threats and called some of the owners by their first name? I'm just spitballing here.
Nope, still mush, but keep plugging away. I'll save you some effort though. If your next thought was adding an ellipsis and a last name and having it come from the dumbest employee of the client website, yep, still mush.
Maybe interwebs lawsuits just aren't a money-maker?
