The burnitdown platform is a juvenile, ad hoc tautology. Belvis tried to question them on having an inconsistent view of Weber as both a good and bad coach. Other than that, they got away with it. It’s really an absurd view, though. Where’s the evidence that there’s some natural type of coach who in Job A is good with someone else’s (highly recruited) players, but bad with his own (highly recruited) players, then turns around and in Job B is good with someone else’s (mid level recruit) players, but bad with his own recruits. Examples? Even supposing that this is a legit coach classification, there’s no evidence that Weber is this type of coach. There can’t be. He’s only had Job A thus far. It’s all just self-serving speculation overstated to the point that it was presented as fact. And it’s absurd speculation at that.
