Author Topic: 12005  (Read 6312 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38112
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: 12005
« Reply #25 on: December 19, 2012, 02:12:10 PM »
I don't know if the attendance or the starting shane southwell at the 4 is funnier.

OMG I know.  I got tuck blasted on twitter last night for simply saying that shane is not the answer at 4.

oscar was on 610 this afternoon tooting his own horn about putting shane there and how that was the difference to give rodney the spacing he needed to produce better than he did in Seattle.

oscar did this for Rod by changing the line up. 


Online LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7087
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: 12005
« Reply #26 on: December 19, 2012, 02:44:21 PM »
i'm glad i kept my $1,800 this year so my tix couldn't serve to perpetuate this lie

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38112
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: 12005
« Reply #27 on: December 19, 2012, 03:47:41 PM »
i'm glad i kept my $1,800 this year so my tix couldn't serve to perpetuate this lie

Yep

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45943
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: 12005
« Reply #28 on: December 19, 2012, 04:38:58 PM »
I don't know if the attendance or the starting shane southwell at the 4 is funnier.

OMG I know.  I got tuck blasted on twitter last night for simply saying that shane is not the answer at 4.

oscar was on 610 this afternoon tooting his own horn about putting shane there and how that was the difference to give rodney the spacing he needed to produce better than he did in Seattle.

oscar did this for Rod by changing the line up.

I mentioned this during the Gonzaga game, he had Shane guarding Olynyk and it was ugly.  So the response to this was to start Shane out of position.

Offline bigwillie20

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2772
  • #FYJC #burnitdown
    • View Profile
Re: 12005
« Reply #29 on: December 19, 2012, 04:42:19 PM »
I don't know if the attendance or the starting shane southwell at the 4 is funnier.

OMG I know.  I got tuck blasted on twitter last night for simply saying that shane is not the answer at 4.

oscar was on 610 this afternoon tooting his own horn about putting shane there and how that was the difference to give rodney the spacing he needed to produce better than he did in Seattle.

oscar did this for Rod by changing the line up.

I mentioned this during the Gonzaga game, he had Shane guarding Olynyk and it was ugly.  So the response to this was to start Shane out of position.

Whatever  :bill: is to scheming, Brucketball is 180 degrees the other way

Offline captaincrap

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 759
    • View Profile
Re: 12005
« Reply #30 on: December 19, 2012, 04:44:00 PM »
we used to make fun of KU for stuff like this.   :frown:

K-State has announced tickets sold as the official attendance number in both football and men's basketball for years and years. It rarely matches butts in seats. This isn't new. Last FB season vs Iowa State, the announced was 47392. Tickets scanned and used was more like 35K becuase of the weather.

But, don't let facts get in your way.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38112
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: 12005
« Reply #31 on: December 19, 2012, 04:46:51 PM »
we all know and understand that.  He was referencing how KU football announces the sold number while showing stands that have a HUGE discrepancy.  It's one thing to announce a capacity when you see a crowd that is reasonably close to it, it's another to announce a capacity and see something that is 30%-40% of it.  This is why we have made fun of KU football and what they report.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: 12005
« Reply #32 on: December 19, 2012, 04:49:39 PM »
I don't know if the attendance or the starting shane southwell at the 4 is funnier.

playing small is always smart.  good for weber.


disclaimer for mir - i did not watch the game.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55979
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: 12005
« Reply #33 on: December 19, 2012, 04:51:55 PM »
I don't know if the attendance or the starting shane southwell at the 4 is funnier.

playing small is always smart.  good for weber.


disclaimer for mir - i did not watch the game.

Not always. I guess I like to forget how awful JO and Adrian have been this year. I haven't watched them much.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38112
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: 12005
« Reply #34 on: December 19, 2012, 04:52:29 PM »
I don't know if the attendance or the starting shane southwell at the 4 is funnier.

playing small is always smart.  good for weber.


disclaimer for mir - i did not watch the game.

Per 610 interview today, could tell oscar really likes "small ball".  Not sure if he likes the idea and what he thinks it does for his team, or if he just really enjoys saying "small ball", but he said it like 6 times in a 2 min period today.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27694
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: 12005
« Reply #35 on: December 19, 2012, 04:53:21 PM »
I don't know if the attendance or the starting shane southwell at the 4 is funnier.

playing small is always smart.  good for weber.


disclaimer for mir - i did not watch the game.

Per 610 interview today, could tell oscar really likes "small ball".  Not sure if he likes the idea and what he thinks it does for his team, or if he just really enjoys saying "small ball", but he said it like 6 times in a 2 min period today.

Sounds Trey Hillmany

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20997
    • View Profile
Re: 12005
« Reply #36 on: December 19, 2012, 05:02:09 PM »
we used to make fun of KU for stuff like this.   :frown:

K-State has announced tickets sold as the official attendance number in both football and men's basketball for years and years. It rarely matches butts in seats. This isn't new. Last FB season vs Iowa State, the announced was 47392. Tickets scanned and used was more like 35K becuase of the weather.

But, don't let facts get in your way.

We used to make fun of KU for "stuff like this" meaning the huge discrepancies between tickets sold and tickets scanned/turnstiles.  I made no claims regarding KSU making anything up.  Your incredibly defensive response speaks for itself.  I'll just offer that I really wasn't trying to be provocative or suggest that there was an effort to make anything up.  Then again, when every single game so far people have been brought in from who knows where to fill the empties courtside, it says about as much as you did about the defensiveness regarding butts in seats.

Offline captaincrap

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 759
    • View Profile
Re: 12005
« Reply #37 on: December 19, 2012, 05:26:59 PM »
we used to make fun of KU for stuff like this.   :frown:

K-State has announced tickets sold as the official attendance number in both football and men's basketball for years and years. It rarely matches butts in seats. This isn't new. Last FB season vs Iowa State, the announced was 47392. Tickets scanned and used was more like 35K becuase of the weather.

But, don't let facts get in your way.

We used to make fun of KU for "stuff like this" meaning the huge discrepancies between tickets sold and tickets scanned/turnstiles.  I made no claims regarding KSU making anything up.  Your incredibly defensive response speaks for itself.  I'll just offer that I really wasn't trying to be provocative or suggest that there was an effort to make anything up.  Then again, when every single game so far people have been brought in from who knows where to fill the empties courtside, it says about as much as you did about the defensiveness regarding butts in seats.

I think you mistook irritation as defensiveness. I was irritated that you were implying that this was the first game ever where the butts in seats number was way lower than announced, when in fact it happens alot here. Its happened in MBB for sveral games every year dating back to Huggins.

Attendance this year hasn't been great, not disagreeing with that central point.

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: 12005
« Reply #38 on: December 19, 2012, 05:31:36 PM »
are they really pulling randos from up in the stands and using them as fillers for the empty courtside seats so that it looks better on tv? that didn't happen under huggins or frank.

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20664
    • View Profile
Re: 12005
« Reply #39 on: December 19, 2012, 05:57:34 PM »
we used to make fun of KU for stuff like this.   :frown:

K-State has announced tickets sold as the official attendance number in both football and men's basketball for years and years. It rarely matches butts in seats. This isn't new. Last FB season vs Iowa State, the announced was 47392. Tickets scanned and used was more like 35K becuase of the weather.

But, don't let facts get in your way.

We used to make fun of KU for "stuff like this" meaning the huge discrepancies between tickets sold and tickets scanned/turnstiles.  I made no claims regarding KSU making anything up.  Your incredibly defensive response speaks for itself.  I'll just offer that I really wasn't trying to be provocative or suggest that there was an effort to make anything up.  Then again, when every single game so far people have been brought in from who knows where to fill the empties courtside, it says about as much as you did about the defensiveness regarding butts in seats.

I think you mistook irritation as defensiveness. I was irritated that you were implying that this was the first game ever where the butts in seats number was way lower than announced, when in fact it happens alot here. Its happened in MBB for sveral games every year dating back to Huggins.

Attendance this year hasn't been great, not disagreeing with that central point.

Huge difference between saying there are 12+ when there are only 3 and saying it when there are 9 or 10.  Doesn't come across as transparent at all

Online steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88715
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: 12005
« Reply #40 on: December 19, 2012, 06:02:45 PM »
we used to make fun of KU for stuff like this.   :frown:

K-State has announced tickets sold as the official attendance number in both football and men's basketball for years and years. It rarely matches butts in seats. This isn't new. Last FB season vs Iowa State, the announced was 47392. Tickets scanned and used was more like 35K becuase of the weather.

But, don't let facts get in your way.

honest answer request: are you excited for the future of KSU basketball under the current coaches/leadership? PM answer if needed. tia.

Offline captaincrap

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 759
    • View Profile
Re: 12005
« Reply #41 on: December 19, 2012, 06:05:50 PM »
are they really pulling randos from up in the stands and using them as fillers for the empty courtside seats so that it looks better on tv?

I honestly don't know. Sorry.

Offline captaincrap

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 759
    • View Profile
Re: 12005
« Reply #42 on: December 19, 2012, 06:10:47 PM »
Huge difference between saying there are 12+ when there are only 3 and saying it when there are 9 or 10.  Doesn't come across as transparent at all

It's dept policy, has been for years. Doubtful they'd change it midway through a season. You didn't notice or complain when the same thing was done in previous seasons...

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22790
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: 12005
« Reply #43 on: December 19, 2012, 06:17:26 PM »
Huge difference between saying there are 12+ when there are only 3 and saying it when there are 9 or 10.  Doesn't come across as transparent at all

It's dept policy, has been for years. Doubtful they'd change it midway through a season. You didn't notice or complain when the same thing was done in previous seasons...
maybe it wasn't as noticeable.


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19149
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: 12005
« Reply #44 on: December 19, 2012, 06:19:10 PM »
Huge difference between saying there are 12+ when there are only 3 and saying it when there are 9 or 10.  Doesn't come across as transparent at all

It's dept policy, has been for years. Doubtful they'd change it midway through a season. You didn't notice or complain when the same thing was done in previous seasons...

Yeah, reporting it however the eff they want doesn't seem like a big deal to me.  What does seem like a big deal, and a sign of the apathy of a significant portion of the fanbase, is that there were no more than 5,000 people at the game on Tuesday.  That didn't happen at any time in the last 6 years.
:adios:

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20664
    • View Profile
Re: 12005
« Reply #45 on: December 19, 2012, 06:33:49 PM »
Huge difference between saying there are 12+ when there are only 3 and saying it when there are 9 or 10.  Doesn't come across as transparent at all

It's dept policy, has been for years. Doubtful they'd change it midway through a season. You didn't notice or complain when the same thing was done in previous seasons...

Yeah, reporting it however the eff they want doesn't seem like a big deal to me.  What does seem like a big deal, and a sign of the apathy of a significant portion of the fanbase, is that there were no more than 5,000 people at the game on Tuesday.  That didn't happen at any time in the last 6 years.
John program killer Currie was the guy that lied about being transparent, don't get snooty with me.

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: 12005
« Reply #46 on: December 19, 2012, 07:07:14 PM »
I don't know if the attendance or the starting shane southwell at the 4 is funnier.

or sadder

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: 12005
« Reply #47 on: December 19, 2012, 09:32:39 PM »
are they really pulling randos from up in the stands and using them as fillers for the empty courtside seats so that it looks better on tv? that didn't happen under huggins or frank.

if randos are so stupid that they can't pull themselves down to the empty courtside seats, they deserve to suffer up in the stands.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline BWebbs0

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 261
    • View Profile
Re: 12005
« Reply #48 on: December 19, 2012, 09:48:08 PM »
oscar Weber has the personality of a dead moth.

Will Spradling is an awful human being.

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: 12005
« Reply #49 on: December 19, 2012, 10:35:24 PM »
are they really pulling randos from up in the stands and using them as fillers for the empty courtside seats so that it looks better on tv? that didn't happen under huggins or frank.

if randos are so stupid that they can't pull themselves down to the empty courtside seats, they deserve to suffer up in the stands.

no. like floor seats where you have to have credentials hanging around your neck or whatever. not just good seats that you can move down into.