Another school shooting

[Cire]

I imagine websites like that will lead to an educator being murdered the way doctors that performed abortions were.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[star seed 7]

It's  to watch #blueanon talk about Dark Money.

I mean 

take the word dark money out and it is still horrific.  If that is all you have you should go back to being humiliated and then crying openly in the Durham thread

First of all, you would think an alleged lawyer would understand that Sussmann was acquitted of one charge relative to one very small part of the whole affair.   I expect nothing less from #blueanonGe than to discount what was testified to under oath relative to Russiagate, particularly you.  On top of what FBI/DOJ and technical experts  said about the "evidence" that HFA et. al. used to plant the fake Russia story. I digress.   

I put very little credence in a hardcore #blueanon'er like Lindsey Simmon's and her unilateral declarations, particularly knowing how hyperbolic #blueanon tends to be about everything i.e. anyone who disagrees with us is a Fascist

the defense verdict was on all charges, and it was unanimous.  He dunked on maga so hard it will leave an indelible mark

Yeah but only because one dude's kid plays on a sports team with another dude's kid otherwise sus-smann would be rough ridin' guilty.

[sonofdaxjones]

It's  to watch #blueanon talk about Dark Money.

I mean 

take the word dark money out and it is still horrific.  If that is all you have you should go back to being humiliated and then crying openly in the Durham thread

First of all, you would think an alleged lawyer would understand that Sussmann was acquitted of one charge relative to one very small part of the whole affair.   I expect nothing less from #blueanonGe than to discount what was testified to under oath relative to Russiagate, particularly you.  On top of what FBI/DOJ and technical experts  said about the "evidence" that HFA et. al. used to plant the fake Russia story. I digress.   

I put very little credence in a hardcore #blueanon'er like Lindsey Simmon's and her unilateral declarations, particularly knowing how hyperbolic #blueanon tends to be about everything i.e. anyone who disagrees with us is a Fascist

the defense verdict was on all charges, and it was unanimous.  He dunked on maga so hard it will leave an indelible mark

It was a simple charge of lying to the FBI (a case made more difficult because of FBI incompetence, in this case, purposeful incompetence which lead to multiple firings and demotions).   It really didn't have anything to do with the lies that HFA et. al. got the easily propagandized parrots of #blueanon to believe. 

I don't expect you to understand, because you're part of the confederacy of not knowers on this blog.   I expect nothing less from #blueanonGe then to cheerlead for an untruth.   This same group believed and still believes that (for example) the Biden laptop was a "classic Russian disinformation campaign".   Thankfully it's being handled out of Delaware, and not DC.

[Dugout DickStone]

It's  to watch #blueanon talk about Dark Money.

I mean 

take the word dark money out and it is still horrific.  If that is all you have you should go back to being humiliated and then crying openly in the Durham thread

First of all, you would think an alleged lawyer would understand that Sussmann was acquitted of one charge relative to one very small part of the whole affair.   I expect nothing less from #blueanonGe than to discount what was testified to under oath relative to Russiagate, particularly you.  On top of what FBI/DOJ and technical experts  said about the "evidence" that HFA et. al. used to plant the fake Russia story. I digress.   

I put very little credence in a hardcore #blueanon'er like Lindsey Simmon's and her unilateral declarations, particularly knowing how hyperbolic #blueanon tends to be about everything i.e. anyone who disagrees with us is a Fascist

the defense verdict was on all charges, and it was unanimous.  He dunked on maga so hard it will leave an indelible mark

It was a simple charge of lying to the FBI (a case made more difficult because of FBI incompetence, in this case, purposeful incompetence which lead to multiple firings and demotions).   It really didn't have anything to do with the lies that HFA et. al. got the easily propagandized parrots of #blueanon to believe. 

I don't expect you to understand, because you're part of the confederacy of not knowers on this blog.   I expect nothing less from #blueanonGe then to cheerlead for an untruth.   This same group believed and still believes that (for example) the Biden laptop was a "classic Russian disinformation campaign".   Thankfully it's being handled out of Delaware, and not DC.

don't do this to yourself a 1000th time.  You are way too old to keep having your beliefs completely disproven and everyone laughing. 

[sonofdaxjones]

It's  to watch #blueanon talk about Dark Money.

I mean 

take the word dark money out and it is still horrific.  If that is all you have you should go back to being humiliated and then crying openly in the Durham thread

First of all, you would think an alleged lawyer would understand that Sussmann was acquitted of one charge relative to one very small part of the whole affair.   I expect nothing less from #blueanonGe than to discount what was testified to under oath relative to Russiagate, particularly you.  On top of what FBI/DOJ and technical experts  said about the "evidence" that HFA et. al. used to plant the fake Russia story. I digress.   

I put very little credence in a hardcore #blueanon'er like Lindsey Simmon's and her unilateral declarations, particularly knowing how hyperbolic #blueanon tends to be about everything i.e. anyone who disagrees with us is a Fascist

the defense verdict was on all charges, and it was unanimous.  He dunked on maga so hard it will leave an indelible mark

It was a simple charge of lying to the FBI (a case made more difficult because of FBI incompetence, in this case, purposeful incompetence which lead to multiple firings and demotions).   It really didn't have anything to do with the lies that HFA et. al. got the easily propagandized parrots of #blueanon to believe. 

I don't expect you to understand, because you're part of the confederacy of not knowers on this blog.   I expect nothing less from #blueanonGe then to cheerlead for an untruth.   This same group believed and still believes that (for example) the Biden laptop was a "classic Russian disinformation campaign".   Thankfully it's being handled out of Delaware, and not DC.

don't do this to yourself a 1000th time.  You are way too old to keep having your beliefs completely disproven and everyone laughing.

Should we let the DOJ/FBI know that the Hunter Biden laptop and all of the information on it can be "completely disproven"?   #blueanon former Intel/DOJ thought leaders already tried to play that card and the FBI/DOJ started an investigation anyway.   

The only thing that was proven in the Sussmann case was that a jury wouldn't convict Sussmann of lying to the FBI.   One would think an alleged lawyer would understand that.

[Dugout DickStone]

It's  to watch #blueanon talk about Dark Money.

I mean 

take the word dark money out and it is still horrific.  If that is all you have you should go back to being humiliated and then crying openly in the Durham thread

First of all, you would think an alleged lawyer would understand that Sussmann was acquitted of one charge relative to one very small part of the whole affair.   I expect nothing less from #blueanonGe than to discount what was testified to under oath relative to Russiagate, particularly you.  On top of what FBI/DOJ and technical experts  said about the "evidence" that HFA et. al. used to plant the fake Russia story. I digress.   

I put very little credence in a hardcore #blueanon'er like Lindsey Simmon's and her unilateral declarations, particularly knowing how hyperbolic #blueanon tends to be about everything i.e. anyone who disagrees with us is a Fascist

the defense verdict was on all charges, and it was unanimous.  He dunked on maga so hard it will leave an indelible mark

It was a simple charge of lying to the FBI (a case made more difficult because of FBI incompetence, in this case, purposeful incompetence which lead to multiple firings and demotions).   It really didn't have anything to do with the lies that HFA et. al. got the easily propagandized parrots of #blueanon to believe. 

I don't expect you to understand, because you're part of the confederacy of not knowers on this blog.   I expect nothing less from #blueanonGe then to cheerlead for an untruth.   This same group believed and still believes that (for example) the Biden laptop was a "classic Russian disinformation campaign".   Thankfully it's being handled out of Delaware, and not DC.

don't do this to yourself a 1000th time.  You are way too old to keep having your beliefs completely disproven and everyone laughing.

Should we let the DOJ/FBI know that the Hunter Biden laptop and all of the information on it can be "completely disproven"?   #blueanon former Intel/DOJ thought leaders already tried to play that card and the FBI/DOJ started an investigation anyway.   

The only thing that was proven in the Sussmann case was that a jury wouldn't convict Sussmann of lying to the FBI.   One would think an alleged lawyer would understand that.

Didn't Rudy have that laptop for awhile?

Do you know what it means when a jury unanimously votes that you should not be guilty?  You are found not guilty and acquitted of the charge.  I know the legal field can be complicated so I won't tease you

[sonofdaxjones]

It's  to watch #blueanon talk about Dark Money.

I mean 

take the word dark money out and it is still horrific.  If that is all you have you should go back to being humiliated and then crying openly in the Durham thread

First of all, you would think an alleged lawyer would understand that Sussmann was acquitted of one charge relative to one very small part of the whole affair.   I expect nothing less from #blueanonGe than to discount what was testified to under oath relative to Russiagate, particularly you.  On top of what FBI/DOJ and technical experts  said about the "evidence" that HFA et. al. used to plant the fake Russia story. I digress.   

I put very little credence in a hardcore #blueanon'er like Lindsey Simmon's and her unilateral declarations, particularly knowing how hyperbolic #blueanon tends to be about everything i.e. anyone who disagrees with us is a Fascist

the defense verdict was on all charges, and it was unanimous.  He dunked on maga so hard it will leave an indelible mark

It was a simple charge of lying to the FBI (a case made more difficult because of FBI incompetence, in this case, purposeful incompetence which lead to multiple firings and demotions).   It really didn't have anything to do with the lies that HFA et. al. got the easily propagandized parrots of #blueanon to believe. 

I don't expect you to understand, because you're part of the confederacy of not knowers on this blog.   I expect nothing less from #blueanonGe then to cheerlead for an untruth.   This same group believed and still believes that (for example) the Biden laptop was a "classic Russian disinformation campaign".   Thankfully it's being handled out of Delaware, and not DC.

don't do this to yourself a 1000th time.  You are way too old to keep having your beliefs completely disproven and everyone laughing.

Should we let the DOJ/FBI know that the Hunter Biden laptop and all of the information on it can be "completely disproven"?   #blueanon former Intel/DOJ thought leaders already tried to play that card and the FBI/DOJ started an investigation anyway.   

The only thing that was proven in the Sussmann case was that a jury wouldn't convict Sussmann of lying to the FBI.   One would think an alleged lawyer would understand that.

Didn't Rudy have that laptop for awhile?

Do you know what it means when a jury unanimously votes that you should not be guilty?  You are found not guilty and acquitted of the charge.  I know the legal field can be complicated so I won't tease you

I will give you this, like Spracs, you are a master of the obvious.

The FBI/DOJ has public information conduits, I'm sure they'll be happy to hear your input on how they're investigating something that can be "completely disproven".    It is now before a grand jury.

[Dugout DickStone]

It's  to watch #blueanon talk about Dark Money.

I mean 

take the word dark money out and it is still horrific.  If that is all you have you should go back to being humiliated and then crying openly in the Durham thread

First of all, you would think an alleged lawyer would understand that Sussmann was acquitted of one charge relative to one very small part of the whole affair.   I expect nothing less from #blueanonGe than to discount what was testified to under oath relative to Russiagate, particularly you.  On top of what FBI/DOJ and technical experts  said about the "evidence" that HFA et. al. used to plant the fake Russia story. I digress.   

I put very little credence in a hardcore #blueanon'er like Lindsey Simmon's and her unilateral declarations, particularly knowing how hyperbolic #blueanon tends to be about everything i.e. anyone who disagrees with us is a Fascist

the defense verdict was on all charges, and it was unanimous.  He dunked on maga so hard it will leave an indelible mark

It was a simple charge of lying to the FBI (a case made more difficult because of FBI incompetence, in this case, purposeful incompetence which lead to multiple firings and demotions).   It really didn't have anything to do with the lies that HFA et. al. got the easily propagandized parrots of #blueanon to believe. 

I don't expect you to understand, because you're part of the confederacy of not knowers on this blog.   I expect nothing less from #blueanonGe then to cheerlead for an untruth.   This same group believed and still believes that (for example) the Biden laptop was a "classic Russian disinformation campaign".   Thankfully it's being handled out of Delaware, and not DC.

don't do this to yourself a 1000th time.  You are way too old to keep having your beliefs completely disproven and everyone laughing.

Should we let the DOJ/FBI know that the Hunter Biden laptop and all of the information on it can be "completely disproven"?   #blueanon former Intel/DOJ thought leaders already tried to play that card and the FBI/DOJ started an investigation anyway.   

The only thing that was proven in the Sussmann case was that a jury wouldn't convict Sussmann of lying to the FBI.   One would think an alleged lawyer would understand that.

Didn't Rudy have that laptop for awhile?

Do you know what it means when a jury unanimously votes that you should not be guilty?  You are found not guilty and acquitted of the charge.  I know the legal field can be complicated so I won't tease you

I will give you this, like Spracs, you are a master of the obvious.

The FBI/DOJ has public information conduits, I'm sure they'll be happy to hear your input on how they're investigating something that can be "completely disproven".    It is now before a grand jury.

you needed the help, so I obliged

[sonofdaxjones]

It's  to watch #blueanon talk about Dark Money.

I mean 

take the word dark money out and it is still horrific.  If that is all you have you should go back to being humiliated and then crying openly in the Durham thread

First of all, you would think an alleged lawyer would understand that Sussmann was acquitted of one charge relative to one very small part of the whole affair.   I expect nothing less from #blueanonGe than to discount what was testified to under oath relative to Russiagate, particularly you.  On top of what FBI/DOJ and technical experts  said about the "evidence" that HFA et. al. used to plant the fake Russia story. I digress.   

I put very little credence in a hardcore #blueanon'er like Lindsey Simmon's and her unilateral declarations, particularly knowing how hyperbolic #blueanon tends to be about everything i.e. anyone who disagrees with us is a Fascist

the defense verdict was on all charges, and it was unanimous.  He dunked on maga so hard it will leave an indelible mark

It was a simple charge of lying to the FBI (a case made more difficult because of FBI incompetence, in this case, purposeful incompetence which lead to multiple firings and demotions).   It really didn't have anything to do with the lies that HFA et. al. got the easily propagandized parrots of #blueanon to believe. 

I don't expect you to understand, because you're part of the confederacy of not knowers on this blog.   I expect nothing less from #blueanonGe then to cheerlead for an untruth.   This same group believed and still believes that (for example) the Biden laptop was a "classic Russian disinformation campaign".   Thankfully it's being handled out of Delaware, and not DC.

don't do this to yourself a 1000th time.  You are way too old to keep having your beliefs completely disproven and everyone laughing.

Should we let the DOJ/FBI know that the Hunter Biden laptop and all of the information on it can be "completely disproven"?   #blueanon former Intel/DOJ thought leaders already tried to play that card and the FBI/DOJ started an investigation anyway.   

The only thing that was proven in the Sussmann case was that a jury wouldn't convict Sussmann of lying to the FBI.   One would think an alleged lawyer would understand that.

Didn't Rudy have that laptop for awhile?

Do you know what it means when a jury unanimously votes that you should not be guilty?  You are found not guilty and acquitted of the charge.  I know the legal field can be complicated so I won't tease you

I will give you this, like Spracs, you are a master of the obvious.

The FBI/DOJ has public information conduits, I'm sure they'll be happy to hear your input on how they're investigating something that can be "completely disproven".    It is now before a grand jury.

you needed the help, so I obliged

They await your input.

https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us

[steve dave]

jesus christ

https://twitter.com/Fxhedgers/status/1532133941330620416

 

[Sandstone Outcropping]

In addition to schools, it looks like hospitals and clinics will now need to be secured by SWAT teams to prevent them from being invaded by bad guys with guns:

https://twitter.com/Pervaizistan/status/1532346886803361792?s=20&t=MCXclsAj8e_YDak2wFgSgA

[Dugout DickStone]

Just harden the hospitals, schools, churches, stores, restaurants, malls and other public places.

problem solved and no rights get infringed

[Institutional Control]

All hospitals should have a single point of entry.

[Dugout DickStone]

All hospitals should have a single point of entry.

doctors/nurses should be armed

[michigancat]

All hospitals should have a single point of entry.

doctors/nurses should be armed

hell, arm the patients

[420seriouscat69]

We should go around door-to-door and take away everyone's guns and see how it goes. Couldn't hurt, right?

[Cire]

We should go around door-to-door and take away everyone's guns and see how it goes. Couldn't hurt, right?

Why would we do that?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Dugout DickStone]

We should go around door-to-door and take away everyone's guns and see how it goes. Couldn't hurt, right?

It couldn't

[420seriouscat69]

We should go around door-to-door and take away everyone's guns and see how it goes. Couldn't hurt, right?

Why would we do that?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Libs wanna take away the gun problem by sarcastically answering how to do it, when this is what they really want, but would cause a civil war. They have all the answers!

[Rage Against the McKee]

Most gun owners would hand their guns over. If you are too afraid to go to the grocery store without a pistol for protection, you are going to be too afraid to stand up to the US government.

[Kat Kid]

It isn't a mystery, it has already been done.  Do gun buy backs and restrict new supply. The last two literally went to a gun superstore and bought new ARs to go on a shooting spree. 

[Dugout DickStone]

We should go around door-to-door and take away everyone's guns and see how it goes. Couldn't hurt, right?

Why would we do that?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Libs wanna take away the gun problem by sarcastically answering how to do it, when this is what they really want, but would cause a civil war. They have all the answers!

No one is going door to door taking guns and anyone who (i assume) sarcastically suggests that when gun control is discussed are just clowns with very low IQ.  It is the talking point of the very, very stupid and scared

If the government did want peoples guns, they would have them and the fat slobs who scream about their ARs couldn't stop it.

[420seriouscat69]

Most gun owners would hand their guns over. If you are too afraid to go to the grocery store without a pistol for protection, you are going to be too afraid to stand up to the US government.

Most gun owners from the south would rather get in a shootout with someone knocking on their door vs handing them over. The picks of people with their guns at the grocery store are cute, but they're not the ones you should worry about.

[Dugout DickStone]

It isn't a mystery, it has already been done.  Do gun buy backs and restrict new supply. The last two literally went to a gun superstore and bought new ARs to go on a shooting spree literally within hours of the purchase of the high capacity killing tool ON rough ridin' CREDIT.

[Rage Against the McKee]

Most gun owners would hand their guns over. If you are too afraid to go to the grocery store without a pistol for protection, you are going to be too afraid to stand up to the US government.

Most gun owners from the south would rather get in a shootout with someone knocking on their door vs handing them over. The picks of people with their guns at the grocery store are cute, but they're not the ones you should worry about.

Some would, most wouldn't.