kim, don't being rough ridin' naive. those teams are in the top 10 because they didn't have to play each other. Add 1 or 2 more losses to each of them and they are scattered throughout the top 25. Instead, they get to hide from each other and pretend to be a tough conference. but whatever. I'm sure you believe in Santa because everyone says he exists.
This
Alabama, Georgia, Texas A&M and South Carolina all only played one out of the three good teams in the other division. Florida and LSU are the only SEC teams that played two out of the three good teams in the other division. None of them had to play all three of the good teams in the other division because they're a bunch of cowards who only play eight conference games in a 14 team conference.
Teams get artificially inflated records and rankings when they miss 5/7ths of the other division. Imagine if KSU didn't have to play Baylor.
South Carolina played UGA, Florida, and LSU. That is tough. A&M played Florida, LSU, and Bama. They both lost 2 of those games and are ranked below us where they belong.
Should they be ranked ahead of OU who lost to #1 & #5?
i dunno, bro. we'll find out after the cotton bowl.
I don't know either, I just find it curious that all SEC teams are ranked as high as can
POSSIBLY be justified. Of course, they are ranked there by the same people who voted NIU as high as they are and are now bitching about the result they created, which is amusing. Does Herbstreit have an AP or Harris vote? If so, where does he have NIU?
Example: Chris Fowler thinks NIU is better than Wisconsin, Nebraska, Baylor, Texas, etc. Does he really rough ridin' believe that after they lost to Iowa and barely beat KU and Army? No, he doesn't REALLY think that, he's just rough ridin' moving them up when people lose ahead of them, regardless of who that loss is too. These people deserve NIU/FSU.