Author Topic: Poke'em if you got'em  (Read 7591 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55920
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Poke'em if you got'em
« Reply #25 on: October 29, 2012, 11:01:01 AM »
be nice to zack. Getting nervous makes the wins that much sweeter.

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22768
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: Poke'em if you got'em
« Reply #26 on: October 29, 2012, 11:06:48 AM »
beast running back
Didn't LHOFHCBS recruit him as a safety?


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline slimz

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Katpak'r
  • *******
  • Posts: 2128
    • View Profile
Re: Poke'em if you got'em
« Reply #27 on: October 29, 2012, 11:22:27 AM »
The Pokes are -4 for the season in turnover margin. Decided advantage for us.
WHEN they allow kickoff returns (rare), they give up some of the longest in NCAA.

They obviously play at a faster offensive pace. If I were OSU, I would try to force the issue on offense, put 8 guys in the box on defense, and try to make it a shootout, hope that Klein finally makes some mistakes in the passing game. As with the rest of the season, we should win as long as we limit our own mistakes.

Could be noted that against Tech there were a few significant "spectacular" or "close" plays that helped break it open: Klein threading the first (?) TD pass just past the defender's lunge, Lockett's tiptoe-dragging catch on the sidelines, the fumble by the Tech WR that stayed in just long enough to be a catch. Now, there were also plays that weren't made (like the dropped INTs), we would have still won because we were by far executing better than Tech after the 1Q, and our players have consistently made "spectacular" plays. But if there's an off night where we don't hit on those plays, then it stays a closer game for a longer time.

Love watching this team. They seem to just be getting better. It's still possible they may lose focus because they're 18-22 year old kids, but I've never seen a group whose chances I like better to stay focused and steady than these guys.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Poke'em if you got'em
« Reply #28 on: October 29, 2012, 11:57:09 AM »
I am worried sick about this game.

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16225
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: Poke'em if you got'em
« Reply #29 on: October 29, 2012, 12:00:34 PM »
most pud game on the schedule.

osu minus weeden minus blackmon plus some freshman dork qb who is banged up minus stillwater plus manhattan equals ksu wins big.

osu fans are adorable, though.  "Arizona beat us, and they beat USC, so we must be good!"

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: Poke'em if you got'em
« Reply #30 on: October 29, 2012, 12:06:51 PM »
I think OSU currently holds the longest streak for scoring 30+ in each game.  I want to say they've scored it in 25 straight games.  And Randle is the best back in the league.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38031
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Poke'em if you got'em
« Reply #31 on: October 29, 2012, 12:19:31 PM »
WildwildPudKillerCats 55
WeedensPreBrownsTeam 30

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2


Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88406
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Poke'em if you got'em
« Reply #32 on: October 29, 2012, 12:25:19 PM »
beast running back
Didn't LHOFHCBS recruit him as a safety?

no, I think we lightly recruited him as a RB. insider grumblings are that we were never really in contact and were the most pud of all teams recruiting him.

Offline GoodForAnother

  • It was all a scheme I used to read emaw magazine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6045
  • You hate to see this Mike
    • View Profile
Re: Poke'em if you got'em
« Reply #33 on: October 29, 2012, 12:25:39 PM »
I think OSU currently holds the longest streak for scoring 30+ in each game.  I want to say they've scored it in 25 straight games.  And Randle is the best back in the league.

streak was broken by cacklin' charlie weis and the beakin' hawks of lawrence ks
emaw

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17807
    • View Profile
Re: Poke'em if you got'em
« Reply #34 on: October 29, 2012, 12:28:35 PM »
I think OSU currently holds the longest streak for scoring 30+ in each game.  I want to say they've scored it in 25 straight games.  And Randle is the best back in the league.

:dubious:

http://espn.go.com/ncf/recap?id=322872305

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13887
    • View Profile
Re: Poke'em if you got'em
« Reply #35 on: October 29, 2012, 12:30:06 PM »
I think OSU currently holds the longest streak for scoring 30+ in each game.  I want to say they've scored it in 25 straight games.  And Randle is the best back in the league.

:dubious:

http://espn.go.com/ncf/recap?id=322872305

Quote
Oklahoma State scored 20 points against Kansas. It snaps a 22-game streak of scoring at least 30 points, which was tied for the FBS record. Oregon now has the longest active streak of scoring 30 points at 19 consecutive games.

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: Poke'em if you got'em
« Reply #36 on: October 29, 2012, 12:35:22 PM »
welp. 

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Poke'em if you got'em
« Reply #37 on: October 29, 2012, 12:38:15 PM »
Lunt takes this team to another level.  Throw out all previous results, these guys are good and bill young has this defense flying to the ball.

Offline _33

  • The Inventor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10531
    • View Profile
Re: Poke'em if you got'em
« Reply #38 on: October 29, 2012, 12:38:57 PM »
So do we match up bad against them or what?  I really want to destroy the guy that said that to me with some HFIQ talking points.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Poke'em if you got'em
« Reply #39 on: October 29, 2012, 12:44:10 PM »
So do we match up bad against them or what?  I really want to destroy the guy that said that to me with some HFIQ talking points.

I have no idea what that would be based on. We're better in every phase of the game than last year. They are worse on offense, probably about the same on defense. We had a chance to win at their place in the final minute. We ran for 276 yards and threw for 231. We were decent against their running game (73 total yards) last year; while I respect Lund, I don't see him throwing for 500 yards like Weeden did.

They may compete with us similar to Tech for a while, but I don't see this game being closer than 14 points.

Offline TheFormerKCCat

  • DoD/Early 90s Era EMAWr
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 443
  • Loyal to a fault
    • View Profile
Re: Poke'em if you got'em
« Reply #40 on: October 29, 2012, 12:46:00 PM »
So do we match up bad against them or what?  I really want to destroy the guy that said that to me with some HFIQ talking points.

I have no idea what that would be based on. We're better in every phase of the game than last year. They are worse on offense, probably about the same on defense. We had a chance to win at their place in the final minute. We ran for 276 yards and threw for 231. We were decent against their running game (73 total yards) last year; while I respect Lund, I don't see him throwing for 500 yards like Weeden did.

They may compete with us similar to Tech for a while, but I don't see this game being closer than 14 points.

 :ksu: Whew! Thanks, _Fan! You're the best.
I'm in it purely for the entertainment value.

Offline XocolateThundarr

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5295
    • View Profile
Re: Poke'em if you got'em
« Reply #41 on: October 29, 2012, 12:52:44 PM »
So do we match up bad against them or what?  I really want to destroy the guy that said that to me with some HFIQ talking points.

I have no idea what that would be based on. We're better in every phase of the game than last year. They are worse on offense, probably about the same on defense. We had a chance to win at their place in the final minute. We ran for 276 yards and threw for 231. We were decent against their running game (73 total yards) last year; while I respect Lund, I don't see him throwing for 500 yards like Weeden did.

They may compete with us similar to Tech for a while, but I don't see this game being closer than 14 points.

 :emawkid: :bill: :emawkid:
@mikec2w

Offline _33

  • The Inventor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10531
    • View Profile
Re: Poke'em if you got'em
« Reply #42 on: October 29, 2012, 12:54:22 PM »
So do we match up bad against them or what?  I really want to destroy the guy that said that to me with some HFIQ talking points.

I have no idea what that would be based on. We're better in every phase of the game than last year. They are worse on offense, probably about the same on defense. We had a chance to win at their place in the final minute. We ran for 276 yards and threw for 231. We were decent against their running game (73 total yards) last year; while I respect Lund, I don't see him throwing for 500 yards like Weeden did.

They may compete with us similar to Tech for a while, but I don't see this game being closer than 14 points.

Thanks _FAN. This dorkstore is about to get de-pantsed.

Offline sekpoke

  • Cow Poke'r
  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 100
    • View Profile
Re: Poke'em if you got'em
« Reply #43 on: October 29, 2012, 01:36:42 PM »
IMHO K State is much better this year than last.

OSU is weaker.  The main difference is OSU is much easier to defend in the red zone because our outside receivers are average at best and our freshman QB is good but not great.  Weeden to Blackmon caused safeties to shade to his side which opened up the running game.  Also our O-line isn't as physical as last year.

Defensively we are stronger at D tackle.  But our negative turnover margin is a return to the norm so to speak.

Really enjoy your board. 

Cats 42
OSU 28

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Poke'em if you got'em
« Reply #44 on: October 29, 2012, 01:37:41 PM »
IMHO K State is much better this year than last.

OSU is weaker.  The main difference is OSU is much easier to defend in the red zone because our outside receivers are average at best and our freshman QB is good but not great.  Weeden to Blackmon caused safeties to shade to his side which opened up the running game.  Also our O-line isn't as physical as last year.

Defensively we are stronger at D tackle.  But our negative turnover margin is a return to the norm so to speak.

Really enjoy your board. 

Cats 42
OSU 28


 :love:

We enjoy you sekpoke!
:adios:

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17807
    • View Profile
Re: Poke'em if you got'em
« Reply #45 on: October 29, 2012, 01:39:20 PM »
IMHO K State is much better this year than last.

OSU is weaker.  The main difference is OSU is much easier to defend in the red zone because our outside receivers are average at best and our freshman QB is good but not great.  Weeden to Blackmon caused safeties to shade to his side which opened up the running game.  Also our O-line isn't as physical as last year.

Defensively we are stronger at D tackle.  But our negative turnover margin is a return to the norm so to speak.

Really enjoy your board. 

Cats 42
OSU 28


Thanks for the kind words, friend!

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: Poke'em if you got'em
« Reply #46 on: October 29, 2012, 01:39:51 PM »
So do we match up bad against them or what?  I really want to destroy the guy that said that to me with some HFIQ talking points.

I have no idea what that would be based on. We're better in every phase of the game than last year. They are worse on offense, probably about the same on defense. We had a chance to win at their place in the final minute. We ran for 276 yards and threw for 231. We were decent against their running game (73 total yards) last year; while I respect Lund, I don't see him throwing for 500 yards like Weeden did.

They may compete with us similar to Tech for a while, but I don't see this game being closer than 14 points.

Who scores more touchdowns on Saturday: Arthur Brown or Baby Lockett?

Offline TheFormerKCCat

  • DoD/Early 90s Era EMAWr
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 443
  • Loyal to a fault
    • View Profile
Re: Poke'em if you got'em
« Reply #47 on: October 29, 2012, 02:42:40 PM »
Who scores more touchdowns on Saturday: Arthur Brown or Baby Lockett?

C43 - I'm gonna go w/Baby Lockett, though a couple out of Arthur would NOT surprise me.  I wish  :lynchmob: was back, because Arthur REALLY deserves to be among the 'Mob.
I'm in it purely for the entertainment value.

Offline HereCumsBullet

  • Cow Poke'r
  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 29
  • 2011 Big XII Champs!
    • View Profile
Re: Poke'em if you got'em
« Reply #48 on: October 29, 2012, 03:08:27 PM »
Also, I saw Bullet poop on their field in 2003.

My territory.

Offline deputy dawg

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4209
  • Wait, wait....what?
    • View Profile
Re: Poke'em if you got'em
« Reply #49 on: October 29, 2012, 03:24:41 PM »
Whoa! Whoa! Whoa!  Everyone is missing the point.  'Zacker saw bullett poop on the field in 2003, and was left emotionally scarred by the experience.  Let's show just a little compassion here.  Sheesh.