Author Topic: For reals ? or !  (Read 16849 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: For reals ? or !
« Reply #150 on: September 28, 2012, 06:33:22 PM »
this year's schedule is NOT harder than last years imo

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: For reals ? or !
« Reply #151 on: September 28, 2012, 06:35:20 PM »
this year's schedule is NOT harder than last years imo

You're nuts, but I'll give you a chance to explain this nonsense. 

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: For reals ? or !
« Reply #152 on: September 28, 2012, 06:43:14 PM »
2011 OU (when they had broyels) and 2011 OSU are better than any team we face in 2012.  the rest of the teams are pretty similar.

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: For reals ? or !
« Reply #153 on: September 28, 2012, 06:49:29 PM »
the big12 is nuts this year you guys. just so hard. the second worst team probably/maybe is iowa state. that game is a road game though and they are currently 3-0 with wins over iowa and a 3-1 tulsa team whose only loss was to iowa state. the only gimme is ku. so one big12 game down. one more to go with ku and then not a bad team after that. it's gonna be tough.

Offline CHONGS

  • The Producer
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20117
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: For reals ? or !
« Reply #154 on: September 28, 2012, 06:58:36 PM »
2011 OU (when they had broyels) and 2011 OSU are better than any team we face in 2012.  the rest of the teams are pretty similar.
This is probably wrong, but de gustibus and all that

Offline Katpappy

  • I got my eye on you
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13335
  • Party on gE
    • View Profile
Re: For reals ? or !
« Reply #155 on: September 28, 2012, 08:04:10 PM »
2011 OU (when they had broyels) and 2011 OSU are better than any team we face in 2012.  the rest of the teams are pretty similar.
Kimmy, remember... TEXAS IS VERY, VERY GOOD!  JFC, DOESN'T ANYONE REALIZE THIS.  :curse:
Hot time in Kat town tonight.

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20631
    • View Profile
Re: For reals ? or !
« Reply #156 on: September 28, 2012, 09:52:07 PM »
Nobody will go through the big 12 undefeated.  I'd guess two 1 loss teams.  2 or 3, 2 loss teams.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45938
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: For reals ? or !
« Reply #157 on: September 29, 2012, 12:10:22 AM »
2011 OU (when they had broyels) and 2011 OSU are better than any team we face in 2012.  the rest of the teams are pretty similar.

So going to WVU and TCU is "pretty similar" to hosting Mizzou & A&M?  uh okay :dunno:

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38007
    • View Profile
Re: For reals ? or !
« Reply #158 on: September 29, 2012, 02:13:00 AM »
I mean, we are replacing lower half conference schools MU and aTm with two top 15 teams this year....and we play them both on the road.  And we only had 4 conference road games last year and we have 5 this year.

I guess I just don't believe that either of those teams will finish in the top 20. They are better than A&M and Mizzou, but 2011 A&M was also a very good team, despite the poor record. This is Bill's hardest schedule, but it's also his best team. We are going to win this conference no sweat.

Offline kslim

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 10531
    • View Profile
Re: For reals ? or !
« Reply #159 on: September 29, 2012, 12:14:21 PM »
guys, wvu is not very good.  I keep saying this but no one listens.

this! havent bought into the texas hype either i think they lose tonight

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40534
    • View Profile
Re: For reals ? or !
« Reply #160 on: September 29, 2012, 12:59:03 PM »
I think we have over 50% chance of winning every game on the rest of our schedule. If you add them all up kenpom style, I think odds are that we have 1 loss.

Why isn't there a kenpom for football? I would pay whatever kenpom wanted me to pay to look at offensive efficiency and run% and role players and major contributors and win probability and projected scores, oh my