Author Topic: "Obamacare"  (Read 317841 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27092
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #125 on: February 02, 2013, 12:21:16 PM »
Weird how expensive stuff can get when you monopolize it and eliminate competition.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17594
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #126 on: February 02, 2013, 12:37:20 PM »
Yes, the previous system was working so well.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13574
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #127 on: February 02, 2013, 12:39:53 PM »
Yes, the previous system was working so well.

shut up you obamabot

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17594
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #128 on: February 02, 2013, 12:42:28 PM »
Yes, the previous system was working so well.

shut up you obamabot

I don't know if Obamacare is the answer.  Haven't studied it in depth or anything, but I've learned enough about the old system to know it was pretty mumped.  Is Obamacare better? :dunno:  I think that will take time to see.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27092
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #129 on: February 02, 2013, 12:56:14 PM »
Yes, the previous system was working so well.

Those are the only 2 options?

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17594
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #130 on: February 02, 2013, 01:27:11 PM »
No.  What I would disagree with was that your statement seemed to come from the belief that the previous marketplace was both open and competitive.

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7639
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #131 on: February 02, 2013, 01:36:08 PM »
No.  What I would disagree with was that your statement seemed to come from the belief that the previous marketplace was both open and competitive.

This was the answer to affordable healthcare, and they mumped it up forever. No going back now.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27092
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #132 on: February 02, 2013, 02:08:10 PM »
No.  What I would disagree with was that your statement seemed to come from the belief that the previous marketplace was both open and competitive.

Oh I don't believe it was at all. But what little competition was in health care has now been squashed. 

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #133 on: February 02, 2013, 02:15:31 PM »
How was competition in the healthcare business different than competition in other typical businesses?

Of all major reasons I've heard cited for rising healthcare costs, I'm not sure I've ever heard lack of competition.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30445
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #134 on: February 02, 2013, 02:26:11 PM »
How was competition in the healthcare business different than competition in other typical businesses?

Of all major reasons I've heard cited for rising healthcare costs, I'm not sure I've ever heard lack of competition.

Our diet drives health care costs.  Anything else is really secondary.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17594
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #135 on: February 02, 2013, 02:57:13 PM »
The competition flaws I am referring to are with how they compete and at what level (usually locally), as well as strict limits to consumer choice within each plan.

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7639
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #136 on: February 02, 2013, 03:20:47 PM »
How was competition in the healthcare business different than competition in other typical businesses?

Of all major reasons I've heard cited for rising healthcare costs, I'm not sure I've ever heard lack of competition.

There is no such thing as interstate medical insurance sales. If you wanted to sell medical insurance in all fifty states, you have to open fifty separate businesses. This may be too simplistic, so anyone in the medical insurance business feel free to chime in.

I do know many states have one insurance company that holds more than 75% of all policies.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #137 on: February 02, 2013, 03:57:08 PM »
How was competition in the healthcare business different than competition in other typical businesses?

Of all major reasons I've heard cited for rising healthcare costs, I'm not sure I've ever heard lack of competition.

There is no such thing as interstate medical insurance sales. If you wanted to sell medical insurance in all fifty states, you have to open fifty separate businesses. This may be too simplistic, so anyone in the medical insurance business feel free to chime in.

I do know many states have one insurance company that holds more than 75% of all policies.

I've worked in the health insurance business for a long time.  Everything you said is false. 

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #138 on: February 02, 2013, 04:03:06 PM »
The competition flaws I am referring to are with how they compete and at what level (usually locally), as well as strict limits to consumer choice within each plan.

Okay, so how is how they compete different from how typical businesses compete?  How are the limits to consumer choice in health insurance different from limits to consumer choice in typical businesses?

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40533
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #139 on: February 02, 2013, 04:29:20 PM »
Our diet drives health care costs.  Anything else is really secondary.

hugely, ridiculously false.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30445
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #140 on: February 02, 2013, 04:31:10 PM »
Our diet drives health care costs.  Anything else is really secondary.

hugely, ridiculously false.

i'd love to hear why
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40533
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #141 on: February 02, 2013, 04:34:04 PM »
Our diet drives health care costs.  Anything else is really secondary.

hugely, ridiculously false.

i'd love to hear why

you're the one who threw out a completely unsupported, completely illogical statement.  try to google up some evidence to support it.  then i'll refute anything you find that you think supports your position.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30445
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #142 on: February 02, 2013, 04:40:53 PM »
Our diet drives health care costs.  Anything else is really secondary.

hugely, ridiculously false.

i'd love to hear why

you're the one who threw out a completely unsupported, completely illogical statement.  try to google up some evidence to support it.  then i'll refute anything you find that you think supports your position.

google came up with some guy from berkeley offering a similar position, I think it hates me.

When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40533
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #143 on: February 02, 2013, 04:42:47 PM »
google came up with some guy from berkeley offering a similar position, I think it hates me.

link it, please?  i'd like to read it while i wait for my kstate wildcats to play bball today.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30445
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #144 on: February 02, 2013, 04:45:11 PM »
google came up with some guy from berkeley offering a similar position, I think it hates me.

link it, please?  i'd like to read it while i wait for my kstate wildcats to play bball today.

http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2010/10/27/whats-the-biggest-driver-of-health-care-costs-our-personal-behaviors/
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17146
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #145 on: February 02, 2013, 04:48:42 PM »
google came up with some guy from berkeley offering a similar position, I think it hates me.

link it, please?  i'd like to read it while i wait for my kstate wildcats to play bball today.

Well this is an interesting change in events.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40533
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #146 on: February 02, 2013, 04:50:49 PM »
http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2010/10/27/whats-the-biggest-driver-of-health-care-costs-our-personal-behaviors/

thanks.  doesn't really address the relative impact of dietary factors on us health care costs.  i'll see if i can find something with concrete numbers, either before or after the game.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40533
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #147 on: February 02, 2013, 04:53:52 PM »
Well this is an interesting change in events.

they've always been mine, jakesie.  i'd scarcely get angry about some guy working for kstate running off the coach of somebody else's team.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline HeinBallz

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2868
    • View Profile
Re: "Obamacare"
« Reply #148 on: February 02, 2013, 10:42:45 PM »
Yes, the previous system was working so well.

shut up you obamabot

I don't know if Obamacare is the answer.  Haven't studied it in depth or anything, but I've learned enough about the old system to know it was pretty mumped.  Is Obamacare better? :dunno:  I think that will take time to see.

That seems to be the thoughts of all the people that:
...Haven't studied it in depth or anything...



 :peek:
Good is better than Evil because it's nicer.

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21337
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
"Obamacare"
« Reply #149 on: February 02, 2013, 10:44:34 PM »
I think the medical system needs to be #burnedtotheground an reimagined. Passing a law so many hate that slightly shakes up the status quo may increase the chance that happens.