0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
in the end, EMAW will always win.
Yes, the previous system was working so well.
Quote from: ChiCat on February 02, 2013, 12:37:20 PMYes, the previous system was working so well.shut up you obamabot
No. What I would disagree with was that your statement seemed to come from the belief that the previous marketplace was both open and competitive.
How was competition in the healthcare business different than competition in other typical businesses?Of all major reasons I've heard cited for rising healthcare costs, I'm not sure I've ever heard lack of competition.
Quote from: chum1 on February 02, 2013, 02:15:31 PMHow was competition in the healthcare business different than competition in other typical businesses?Of all major reasons I've heard cited for rising healthcare costs, I'm not sure I've ever heard lack of competition.There is no such thing as interstate medical insurance sales. If you wanted to sell medical insurance in all fifty states, you have to open fifty separate businesses. This may be too simplistic, so anyone in the medical insurance business feel free to chime in.I do know many states have one insurance company that holds more than 75% of all policies.
The competition flaws I am referring to are with how they compete and at what level (usually locally), as well as strict limits to consumer choice within each plan.
Our diet drives health care costs. Anything else is really secondary.
Quote from: wetwillie on February 02, 2013, 02:26:11 PMOur diet drives health care costs. Anything else is really secondary.hugely, ridiculously false.
Quote from: sys on February 02, 2013, 04:29:20 PMQuote from: wetwillie on February 02, 2013, 02:26:11 PMOur diet drives health care costs. Anything else is really secondary.hugely, ridiculously false.i'd love to hear why
Quote from: wetwillie on February 02, 2013, 04:31:10 PMQuote from: sys on February 02, 2013, 04:29:20 PMQuote from: wetwillie on February 02, 2013, 02:26:11 PMOur diet drives health care costs. Anything else is really secondary.hugely, ridiculously false.i'd love to hear whyyou're the one who threw out a completely unsupported, completely illogical statement. try to google up some evidence to support it. then i'll refute anything you find that you think supports your position.
google came up with some guy from berkeley offering a similar position, I think it hates me.
Quote from: wetwillie on February 02, 2013, 04:40:53 PMgoogle came up with some guy from berkeley offering a similar position, I think it hates me.link it, please? i'd like to read it while i wait for my kstate wildcats to play bball today.
http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2010/10/27/whats-the-biggest-driver-of-health-care-costs-our-personal-behaviors/
Well this is an interesting change in events.
Quote from: kim carnes on February 02, 2013, 12:39:53 PMQuote from: ChiCat on February 02, 2013, 12:37:20 PMYes, the previous system was working so well.shut up you obamabotI don't know if Obamacare is the answer. Haven't studied it in depth or anything, but I've learned enough about the old system to know it was pretty mumped. Is Obamacare better? I think that will take time to see.
...Haven't studied it in depth or anything...