DJamer Wally is awful. It would be one thing if he had sources (he doesn't). It would be another if he had an ability to break down college football (he can't). But for someone with neither of these key assets for a commentator he sure does love to pretend he has both.
"There is a reason why Daniel Sams was 3rd on the depth chart heading into spring football. It is because Tay Bender beat him out. Tay Bender was an all-around better Quarterback. From what I'd heard, he'd dedicated himself more to the playbook, he was in better shape, yadda, yadda, yadda.....I think actually Tay Bender leaving has helped Daniel Sams it has kind of given him a renewed sense of confidence to go along with the start he's already had...."
When your "analysis" pivots on "facts" that are:
1) not publicly available/unconfirmed 2) disputed by all publicly available and confirmed evidenceit becomes very difficult to take anything you "report" as "true." Your "source" claims that Tay Bender was indisputably a better QB than Sams. Your "source" claims the reasons listed for Tay Bender being ahead of Daniel Sams on the depth chart related to "dedication to the playbook," his "shape" and "yadda, yadda, yadda." I mean I guess that is better than Matt Wolter's pimping Sam Johnson, but good god.
Then his "I think" analysis statement? That Daniel Sams was suffering from some sort of crisis of confidence?
Fitz re: Sams playing alongside Sams and a possible conversion to RB-- "I don't know anything here." Thanks for the honesty Fitz.
