i don't know any more than anyone else here but since you asked, i'll give you my guess as to what took place. but first it's important to clear up an issue in your post. cc never posted that currie had no control, he posted that it wasn't currie who was negotiating with fox sports. i hope you never thought that currie had no control, you seem smarter than that. anyway, there's a difference there which i'm sure you're able to discern.
here's my guess as to what happened-
fact- learfield owns negotiating responsibilities as our rights holder.
guess- currie trusted that they would come to an agreement with fox sports to work out a deal and stayed out of it.
fact- learfield and fox sports didn't come to an agreement. learfield asked for too much.
guess- currie underestimated learfields ability to negotiate a deal.
guess- currie, two weeks ago and once it came out that the two sides weren't able to work out a deal, began pressuring learfield to get a deal done. while he can't negotiate w/ fox sports, he can certainly negotiate with learfield as it relates to K-State and Learfield's future relationship together.
guess- learfield, reacting to currie's involvement and pressure, went back to the table with fox sports with more reasonable terms for both sides.
guess- the situation will be resolved in short order. and it very well may have been worked out w/o adjc's involvement. or maybe not.
does any of this really matter, it's resolved. sorry you missed out on a vball game.