Author Topic: William Powell  (Read 4178 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ELL3

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 773
    • View Profile
William Powell
« on: August 10, 2012, 09:22:46 PM »
 :ksu: :dance:


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline Winters

  • The King of Real Zeal
  • Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *********
  • Posts: 16035
    • View Profile
Re: William Powell
« Reply #1 on: August 10, 2012, 09:24:43 PM »
NFL Factory.
Best #heel and/or #babyface on this blogsite



If it were up to me, Wintz would be on a fan scholarship, full ride.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: William Powell
« Reply #2 on: August 10, 2012, 09:28:52 PM »
He looks good.

Offline WildcatNkilt

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6929
  • Had the worst birthday ever on Dec. 5th of '98.
    • View Profile
Re: William Powell
« Reply #3 on: August 10, 2012, 09:31:03 PM »
Jesus we should be pulling some legit 5-star RB tail with those stats.  Backups scoring TDs = RB University
Kansas City Blue Barbecue fan.

Offline PowercatPat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4427
  • #BID
    • View Profile
Re: William Powell
« Reply #4 on: August 10, 2012, 09:43:26 PM »
Thomas Clayton is getting some playing time too.

Offline Winters

  • The King of Real Zeal
  • Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *********
  • Posts: 16035
    • View Profile
Re: William Powell
« Reply #5 on: August 10, 2012, 09:45:02 PM »
Cardinals have an EMAW pipeline!
Best #heel and/or #babyface on this blogsite



If it were up to me, Wintz would be on a fan scholarship, full ride.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: William Powell
« Reply #6 on: August 10, 2012, 11:52:12 PM »
Thomas Clayton is getting some playing time too.
He's a professional practice squad player. Must be nice to make 80 grand a year to practice football.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51456
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: William Powell
« Reply #7 on: August 11, 2012, 12:24:10 PM »
Thomas Clayton is getting some playing time too.
He's a professional practice squad player. Must be nice to make 80 grand a year to practice football.

Doesn't sound that nice.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13555
    • View Profile
Re: William Powell
« Reply #8 on: August 11, 2012, 12:28:26 PM »
Thomas Clayton is getting some playing time too.
He's a professional practice squad player. Must be nice to make 80 grand a year to practice football.

Doesn't sound that nice.

it does to fanning

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: William Powell
« Reply #9 on: August 23, 2012, 09:41:37 PM »
5 carries, 66 yards, & a TD tonight.

Offline Katpappy

  • I got my eye on you
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12808
  • Party on gE
    • View Profile
Re: William Powell
« Reply #10 on: August 23, 2012, 10:33:35 PM »
5 carries, 66 yards, & a TD tonight.
I really enjoy when they mention "Powell, that little known running back from Kansas State University".  :love:
Hot time in Kat town tonight.

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9553
    • View Profile
Re: William Powell
« Reply #11 on: August 23, 2012, 10:56:11 PM »
Cardinals RB William Powell continued his strong preseason with 71 yards and a touchdown on seven carries against the Titans Thursday night.
The NFL's preseason rushing leader caught the eye of Rotoworld's Chris Wesseling last week, showing more burst than presumed third-stringer Alfonso Smith ever has at this level. Up to 231 yards at 7.0 per clip after a strong training camp, Powell is doing is best to push Smith off the roster -- even if his production has come primarily versus players that will be cut next week. Aug 23 - 11:46 PM

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: William Powell
« Reply #12 on: August 23, 2012, 11:14:18 PM »
It's rising! :emawboner:

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13555
    • View Profile
Re: William Powell
« Reply #13 on: August 23, 2012, 11:21:40 PM »
Pretty sure he was actually better than Daniel Thomas.   fybs

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: William Powell
« Reply #14 on: August 23, 2012, 11:34:30 PM »
Pretty sure he was actually better than Daniel Thomas.   fybs
:lol:

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: William Powell
« Reply #15 on: August 24, 2012, 08:56:46 AM »
Pretty sure he was actually better than Daniel Thomas.   fybs

He was a different kind of runner then DT, obviously.  Too bad he got hurt when he did.

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16749
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: William Powell
« Reply #16 on: August 24, 2012, 09:14:26 AM »
Pretty sure he was actually better than Daniel Thomas.   fybs

i'm not at the point where i will agree that this is true, but i certainly had the same thoughts when they were here.

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9553
    • View Profile
Re: William Powell
« Reply #17 on: August 24, 2012, 07:58:47 PM »
Pretty sure he was actually better than Daniel Thomas.   fybs

i'm not at the point where i will agree that this is true, but i certainly had the same thoughts when they were here.

Why because Powell has had success against third stringers in the preseason, and Thomas did a poor job sharing the load with Reggie Bush?

Even a drunk six year old would know better.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13555
    • View Profile
Re: William Powell
« Reply #18 on: August 24, 2012, 08:02:00 PM »
Pretty sure he was actually better than Daniel Thomas.   fybs

i'm not at the point where i will agree that this is true, but i certainly had the same thoughts when they were here.

Why because Powell has had success against third stringers in the preseason, and Thomas did a poor job sharing the load with Reggie Bush?

Even a drunk six year old would know better.

b/c we have eyes and see things for what they are. 

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17576
    • View Profile
Re: William Powell
« Reply #19 on: August 24, 2012, 08:13:59 PM »
I'm sure LHC Bill Snyder benched the better player because that would make sense.  Thank god the worst of the two was good enough to be a top 50 NFL pick

Offline Sandstone Outcropping

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8670
  • a punk who rarely ever took advice
    • View Profile
Re: William Powell
« Reply #20 on: August 24, 2012, 08:37:03 PM »
 :kstategrad:

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13555
    • View Profile
Re: William Powell
« Reply #21 on: August 25, 2012, 10:39:37 AM »
I'm sure LHC LHC Bill Snyder benched the better player because that would make sense.  Thank god the worst of the two was good enough to be a top 50 NFL pick

yeah, no coach has ever played a worse player in front of a better player   :flush:

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: William Powell
« Reply #22 on: August 25, 2012, 10:43:10 AM »
I'm sure LHC LHC LHC Bill Snyder benched the better player because that would make sense.  Thank god the worst of the two was good enough to be a top 50 NFL pick

yeah, no coach has ever played a worse player in front of a better player   :flush:
KC, are you being serious here? Thomas is twice the back. I love Powell and he does some great things, but GMAFB. I thought you were joking when you first brought it up.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13555
    • View Profile
Re: William Powell
« Reply #23 on: August 25, 2012, 10:46:44 AM »
I'm sure LHC LHC LHC LHC Bill Snyder benched the better player because that would make sense.  Thank god the worst of the two was good enough to be a top 50 NFL pick

yeah, no coach has ever played a worse player in front of a better player   :flush:
KC, are you being serious here? Thomas is twice the back. I love Powell and he does some great things, but GMAFB. I thought you were joking when you first brought it up.

yes, i thought powell was better when he was here.  i haven't seen him play in the preseason

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: William Powell
« Reply #24 on: August 25, 2012, 10:48:28 AM »
I'm sure LHC LHC LHC LHC LHC LHC Bill Snyder benched the better player because that would make sense.  Thank god the worst of the two was good enough to be a top 50 NFL pick

yeah, no coach has ever played a worse player in front of a better player   :flush:
KC, are you being serious here? Thomas is twice the back. I love Powell and he does some great things, but GMAFB. I thought you were joking when you first brought it up.

yes, i thought powell was better when he was here.  i haven't seen him play in the preseason
Weird. I respect your opinion, but DT was the whole offense. I don't even want to think about how bad we would have been without DT and full time WP. I just think DT's size helped us a lot.