0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
the arrow direction is simply to aid in determining which team is which (starting with 2003)
Quote from: Chingon on April 06, 2012, 04:59:52 PMthe arrow direction is simply to aid in determining which team is which (starting with 2003)I am I correct in stating the 2008 KU team is the best of all championship teams since 2003?
Quote from: Skipper44 on April 06, 2012, 05:03:55 PMQuote from: Chingon on April 06, 2012, 04:59:52 PMthe arrow direction is simply to aid in determining which team is which (starting with 2003)I am I correct in stating the 2008 KU team is the best of all championship teams since 2003? I think it's the 2007 Florida Gators.
in the end, EMAW will always win.
Quote from: michigancat on April 06, 2012, 05:07:15 PMQuote from: Skipper44 on April 06, 2012, 05:03:55 PMQuote from: Chingon on April 06, 2012, 04:59:52 PMthe arrow direction is simply to aid in determining which team is which (starting with 2003)I am I correct in stating the 2008 KU team is the best of all championship teams since 2003? I think it's the 2007 Florida Gators.Well then, you'd be wrong. It matches KU from the first chart.
The band of color are contour levels for expected winning percentage given the offensive and defensive efficiency.
Quote from: Chingon on April 05, 2012, 10:12:03 PMThe band of color are contour levels for expected winning percentage given the offensive and defensive efficiency.Where does this data come from?
its not data, but the band are a formula of my own accord based on log5 principles.
Don't know if its possible or not, but could you chart games from a singular season? Say, oscar before and after he lost the Illini?
Purple = nonconyellow= conf+tourn
yeah I don't think its very useful to look at. Almost every team will end the year in the black area (because they lost). Too much variance between strength of opponent and what not.
Quote from: Chingon on April 06, 2012, 05:57:42 PMyeah I don't think its very useful to look at. Almost every team will end the year in the black area (because they lost). Too much variance between strength of opponent and what not. I think the yearly trends are fantastic though. Thanks again for doing them. How about Norm Roberts -> Steve Lavin and FAU w/ Mike Jarvis and the guy before him?
Quote from: Chingon on April 06, 2012, 11:01:03 AMQuote from: steve dave on April 06, 2012, 10:58:49 AMwhat is with the impossibly bad arrow at the end of white? Docs last year: OE = 100.2DE = 99.9lol doc
Quote from: steve dave on April 06, 2012, 10:58:49 AMwhat is with the impossibly bad arrow at the end of white? Docs last year: OE = 100.2DE = 99.9
what is with the impossibly bad arrow at the end of white?
Siu...weber-painter-lowrey. Please.
