I not trying to convince you guys to like BW or even JC. I've said repeatedly that I'm not defending the hire.
cc, you obviously are defending the hire, and pretty vigorously. the less you lie the more credibility you retain.
I've never said one thing about BW other than to say he hasn't coached a game here. Never once said it was a good or bad hire, never once said the phrase "give it time", never once said anything about how well he will do, never once made an excuse for his record at Illinois. Just because you might disagree with me doesn't make me a liar.
This thread has devolved into exactly what pissed me off at the beginning -- if someone doesn't agree with your preconceived notion that Currie is evil, they are shouted down by the mob. All I've done is tried to give you guys some added info in the hope that it would cause some of you to back away from the ledge. It clearly hasn't worked.
I've pointed out that Currie and by extension the AthDept could have and should have done better with things over the last month. I'm also privy to information surrounding those events that you are not, and I know the result of that is that you and I will have different interpretations. I don't expect you to ever be real happy with Jamargate or Frank's exit, because odds are you will only have the current public info -- which doesn't paint a pretty picture of K-State. I've tried to give as much insight as possible to help provide context, at risk to me.
JC pledged transparency in contractual and financial reporting. He did not promise to reveal every private detail on every employee or athlete. When he believes that he shouldn't discuss details because it would bring harm to the University or individuals, he isn't lying -- he's protecting K-State. Which I would argue is one of his job requirements.