Author Topic: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.  (Read 143590 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42623
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #350 on: March 18, 2012, 01:37:52 AM »

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55959
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #351 on: March 18, 2012, 01:38:18 AM »

I think he runs a "large tent."  I believe that he believed that most of his constituency would be behind him, AND that he'd show prospective employers that he improved the facilities and donations at KSU whilst staying compliant...and a compliance "event" is just icing on the cake.

 "Compliance events" are icing on the cake? Yes, I'm sure Florida would love to have a few high profile "compliance events" during bowl season or the week before the uga game. They love that kind of crap.


Offline p1k3

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2555
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #352 on: March 18, 2012, 01:39:37 AM »
The Alabama president would show him the rough ridin' door right then and there.

That's why they have 12 National Championships.

I know, but i was just making a point. Bama was a bad example.

Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16748
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #353 on: March 18, 2012, 01:48:52 AM »
The Alabama president would show him the rough ridin' door right then and there.

That's why they have 12 National Championships.

I know, but i was just making a point. Bama was a bad example.

I know, I was just making a LOL.  Came out mean-ish sounding.   :cheers:
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55959
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #354 on: March 18, 2012, 01:51:27 AM »
The Alabama president would show him the rough ridin' door right then and there.

That's why they have 12 National Championships.

I know, but i was just making a point. Bama was a bad example.

I know, I was just making a LOL.  Came out mean-ish sounding.   :cheers:

To be fair, every school that pays more than KSU would be a bad example.

Offline 0.42

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7746
  • pasghetti
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #355 on: March 18, 2012, 01:54:54 AM »
I've had a good 12 hours to digest this and four hours of driving from Manhattan to Oklahoma with nothing but my thoughts and some jams to listen to. I'm still angry. Not because we lost. I'm angry that athletes like Jamar, Jacob, and CK get made scapegoats out of by our stoolpigeon athletic department for doing the most minor of minor transgressions (or in Jamar's case, maybe no transgressions at all). John Currie throwing student athletes under the bus makes me angry enough, but what's worse is that the tucks/townies will eat this up and will use this as ammo that our basketball program is "clearly out of control" and Frank is an unhinged madman who shouldn't represent K-State.

This is what they want. Student athletes getting thrown under the bus if they don't fit the shirt tuck mold of a student-athlete from the rough ridin' 1950's. Recruiting classes full of five-hearts from Goodland and Junction City. Mediocre results as long as every last rough ridin' thing is done "the right way." See a basketball player in the hallway and he picks up a quarter lying on the ground? Someone clearly left that for him and it's an impermissible benefit. Gotta turn him in so we can do things "the right way." After all, he's black, so he can't be trusted with any money that's not given to him by KSU, right?

eff this crap. Pete's right, unionization has to happen for college players, and damned soon. This is just straight up abusive.

Offline j-von

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1632
  • Hates The Band
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #356 on: March 18, 2012, 01:58:18 AM »
The Alabama president would show him the rough ridin' door right then and there.

That's why they have 12 National Championships.

I know, but i was just making a point. Bama was a bad example.

I know, I was just making a LOL.  Came out mean-ish sounding.   :cheers:

Alabama would be happy to have a guy with a clean compliance record.  They just make it clear during the interview process that sort of stuff is taken seriously, and that there is a "chain of command" that things have to run through so problems disappear in the process.

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42623
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #357 on: March 18, 2012, 02:20:40 AM »
Curtis Malone is a "suit?"

Offline 0.42

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7746
  • pasghetti
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #358 on: March 18, 2012, 02:25:09 AM »
Curtis Malone is a "suit?"

Yeah this was simultaneously bemusing and befuddling

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #359 on: March 18, 2012, 02:36:09 AM »
An entire thread devoted to melting down over hearsay and personal guesses about Jamar.  Just when I think our fanbase can't possibly be any dumber...

Offline TBL

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2093
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #360 on: March 18, 2012, 02:38:27 AM »
You know, this event has brought about an interesting idea. What would happen if someone would email an athletic department from a soon-to-be-played school and said that one/two/three of their players violated some nca2 rule, whether true or not. Maybe even telling that school that a "cc" had been sent to nca2 compliance? Would that keep certain "star" players from enjoying the fun of playing in a major game? Only a thought, but it does show how easy it is for a lone douchebag to totally screw up a season.

Offline bigDcat

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 442
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #361 on: March 18, 2012, 02:42:19 AM »
An entire thread devoted to melting down over hearsay and personal guesses about Jamar.  Just when I think our fanbase can't possibly be any dumber...

 :flush:

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #362 on: March 18, 2012, 03:11:05 AM »
So, if we don't suspend him, and just for shits & giggles, lets say Jamar makes up a 16 point difference (LOL), and we beat 'Cuse...then this week, or next month, whenever it comes to light that Jamar DID have eligibility issues and we forfeit everything...you guys that hate Currie now would have his back then?

If it IS 'just' $200 from a family friend, I agree it looks bad, but it isn't like Currie is handed a dossier with 100% of the facts (i.e. he doesn't know if that $200 is a one time thing, or the only thing he knows about right now). He has to make a judgement call based on what he has, and he HAS to take Jamar's history of boneheaded decisions into account.

just sayin

These kind of quotes absolutely astonish me. We lost by 20 because we didn't give up at the end and kept fouling. If Jamar would have made even a 6 point difference, that could have been all that we needed.
« Last Edit: March 18, 2012, 03:14:02 AM by Nuts Kicked »

Offline CrushNasty

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1000
  • Future Shooter Jones W.C.
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #363 on: March 18, 2012, 03:38:38 AM »
Love Pete in this thread.      (Except he missed on the "Currie is doing this for his resume" point.)

LOSC's Malone-Cuse theory is hilarious, too.
« Last Edit: March 18, 2012, 03:48:06 AM by CrushNasty »

Offline CrushNasty

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1000
  • Future Shooter Jones W.C.
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #364 on: March 18, 2012, 03:42:21 AM »
I feel bad for everyone that ever again has to hit the recruiting trail with this in their rear-view mirror.
« Last Edit: March 18, 2012, 03:46:39 AM by CrushNasty »

Offline CrushNasty

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1000
  • Future Shooter Jones W.C.
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #365 on: March 18, 2012, 03:50:56 AM »
Not the biggest point, but...


if we can't feed Jamar, then i just..... idk where to rough ridin' start with our athletic department...

Offline CatsFan_58

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 667
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #366 on: March 18, 2012, 04:21:34 AM »
Frank was quoted after game saying he believed that Jam did nothing wrong, and that all other questions should be directed to the AD....was tweeted by sporting news.

Frank is a pathetic excuse for a basketball coach.   LOL at anyone blaming this crap show on currie.  LOFLz
You're worse than JT, Dobbie and Fanning combined.
I know they just gave computer privileges down at achievement services...

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #367 on: March 18, 2012, 05:52:56 AM »
do I have the cliffs right

*Jamar gets $200 from Malone for food
*some townie reports it to K-State
*JC decides to sit Jamar even with a legit 'out' as MIR indicates with the prior relationship rule (hope I didn't screw that up)
*JC issues no statements and allows excessive tuckism to erupt
*NCAA did not suspend Jamar or indicate their leaning one way or the other
*tucks support the decision while fans who live in the real world become mind mumped
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59550
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #368 on: March 18, 2012, 06:27:18 AM »
jttuck says its "hearsay".

So, Malone didn't wire Jamar $200, it is not understood that this may not have even been an NCAA violation, Jamar was NOT suspended for the game by the athletic department for doing something that MAY NOT have been an NCAA violation.   It was not reported that a 3rd party narc'd on Jamar when he received a wire transfer from Curtis Malone. 

Again, it's all "hearsay" according to jttuck.


Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32514
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #369 on: March 18, 2012, 08:04:25 AM »
I really hope we get a name in regards to where the leak came from, currie will get away with his sins but we need a sacrificial lamb.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20997
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #370 on: March 18, 2012, 08:29:56 AM »
jttuck says its "hearsay".

So, Malone didn't wire Jamar $200, it is not understood that this may not have even been an NCAA violation, Jamar was NOT suspended for the game by the athletic department for doing something that MAY NOT have been an NCAA violation.   It was not reported that a 3rd party narc'd on Jamar when he received a wire transfer from Curtis Malone. 

Again, it's all "hearsay" according to jttuck.

When emaw is under attack, you always come through.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59550
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #371 on: March 18, 2012, 08:51:59 AM »
Now the Fitz is saying that Samuels getting the money from Malone was an NCAA violation, because the Malone/Samuels relationship, despite going back years was "rooted in basketball".    How do they determine that? 




Offline Bill Clarahan

  • agricultural related person
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 722
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #372 on: March 18, 2012, 08:53:14 AM »
There arent very many people that im ashamed to have associated with K-State, but Currie just about penciled himself in with Krause and BTK.

Krause would not have done this

Offline Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29366
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #373 on: March 18, 2012, 08:54:12 AM »
why are there so many people in positions of influence that openly want us to fail?  it's infuriating

Offline Bill Clarahan

  • agricultural related person
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 722
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #374 on: March 18, 2012, 09:01:51 AM »
Now the Fitz is saying that Samuels getting the money from Malone was an NCAA violation, because the Malone/Samuels relationship, despite going back years was "rooted in basketball".    How do they determine that?

He' playing to the crowd Dax, have you not been reading their idiocy