Author Topic: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie. (Read 143874 times)

Cartierfor3 · « **Reply #100 on:** March 17, 2012, 04:38:52 PM »

Quote from: bigDcat on March 17, 2012, 04:37:05 PM

@austin_meek: Malone didn''t believe gift represented an impermissible benefit because of his pre-existing relationship with Samuels and his mother.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Fire Currie.

michigancat · « **Reply #101 on:** March 17, 2012, 04:39:31 PM »

great job by meek

0.42 · « **Reply #102 on:** March 17, 2012, 04:39:46 PM »

I sense a board renaming coming from this.

chum1 · « **Reply #103 on:** March 17, 2012, 04:41:56 PM »

if i believe anyone who says that something curtis malone did was on the up and up, it's curtis malone.

kstater · « **Reply #104 on:** March 17, 2012, 04:42:10 PM »

I'm as mad as anyone at JC, but what kind of rough ridin' moron(read Jamar and Malone) can't do that in private?

MakeItRain · « **Reply #105 on:** March 17, 2012, 04:43:49 PM »

Of course Jamar playing would have made a positive difference, unless you think it was better for Gipson to be shooting all of those free throws. Gipson hadn't played the high post all season and that is integral to beating that zone. How Jamar played the previous games is completely irrelevant because the style of play is completely unique. Jamar is a better passer, shooter, drawer of fouls, free throw shooter, ball handler, and rebounded than Gipson at this point. How you feel about if the team would have been better with Jamar is a litmus test, not of basketball knowledge but of common sense.

chum1 · « **Reply #106 on:** March 17, 2012, 04:46:32 PM »

Quote from: kstater on March 17, 2012, 04:42:10 PM

I'm as mad as anyone at JC, but what kind of rough ridin' moron(read Jamar and Malone) can't do that in private?

agreed. samuels legacy should be that of a eff up, not the guy who could have been the difference.

MakeItRain · « **Reply #107 on:** March 17, 2012, 04:47:00 PM »

Quote from: kstater on March 17, 2012, 04:42:10 PM

I'm as mad as anyone at JC, but what kind of rough ridin' moron(read Jamar and Malone) can't do that in private?

Assuming they didn't "do that in private" don't you think the fact that they didn't do it in private indicate that they didn't have anything to hide?

ChiComCat · « **Reply #108 on:** March 17, 2012, 04:47:09 PM »

Quote from: MakeItRain on March 17, 2012, 04:43:49 PM

Of course Jamar playing would have made a positive difference, unless you think it was better for Gipson to be shooting all of those free throws. Gipson hadn't played the high post all season and that is integral to beating that zone. How Jamar played the previous games is completely irrelevant because the style of play is completely unique. Jamar is a better passer, shooter, drawer of fouls, free throw shooter, ball handler, and rebounded than Gipson at this point. How you feel about if the team would have been better with Jamar is a litmus test, not of basketball knowledge but of common sense.

How Jamar played in the previous game is also completely irrelevant because it has been his whole career.

kstater · « **Reply #109 on:** March 17, 2012, 04:47:36 PM »

Quote from: MakeItRain on March 17, 2012, 04:47:00 PM

Quote from: kstater on March 17, 2012, 04:42:10 PM
I'm as mad as anyone at JC, but what kind of rough ridin' moron(read Jamar and Malone) can't do that in private?

Assuming they didn't "do that in private" don't you think the fact that they didn't do it in private indicate that they didn't have anything to hide?

No, it indicates they're rough ridin' retards.

jmlynch1 · « **Reply #110 on:** March 17, 2012, 04:49:49 PM »

Quote from: LHarKSUCat on March 17, 2012, 04:32:38 PM

Austin Meek ? @austin_meek
Jamar Samuels suspension believed to be related to financial benefit from Curtis Malone, founder of the DC Assault AAU organization.

pfft I hope this book never ends

MakeItRain · « **Reply #111 on:** March 17, 2012, 04:50:29 PM »

If Meek's story is accurate it is bad for Currie and compliance. It would be quite easy to prove a prior relationship. They have a documented relationship that's at least a decade long.

0.42 · « **Reply #112 on:** March 17, 2012, 04:51:13 PM »

Well this certainly explains why the DC Pipeline dried up.

kitten_mittons · « **Reply #113 on:** March 17, 2012, 04:55:34 PM »

Quote from: ChiCat on March 17, 2012, 04:47:09 PM

Quote from: MakeItRain on March 17, 2012, 04:43:49 PM
Of course Jamar playing would have made a positive difference, unless you think it was better for Gipson to be shooting all of those free throws. Gipson hadn't played the high post all season and that is integral to beating that zone. How Jamar played the previous games is completely irrelevant because the style of play is completely unique. Jamar is a better passer, shooter, drawer of fouls, free throw shooter, ball handler, and rebounded than Gipson at this point. How you feel about if the team would have been better with Jamar is a litmus test, not of basketball knowledge but of common sense.

How Jamar played in the previous game is also completely irrelevant because it has been his whole career.

Besides JO, over the course of his career, he's played better than any post on our team did today.

Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk

j-dub · « **Reply #114 on:** March 17, 2012, 04:56:33 PM »

i wanna lock currie in sandusky's cell and throw away the key.

bigDcat · « **Reply #115 on:** March 17, 2012, 04:56:48 PM »

Quote from: MakeItRain on March 17, 2012, 04:50:29 PM

If Meek's story is accurate it is bad for Currie and compliance. It would be quite easy to prove a prior relationship. They have a documented relationship that's at least a decade long.

Yeah, Malone's quotes make it sound like this has been happening for a while.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Paul Moscow · « **Reply #116 on:** March 17, 2012, 04:57:15 PM »

Doesn't help that Malone was just charged with assault three days ago.

The Whale · « **Reply #117 on:** March 17, 2012, 04:57:56 PM »

I expect a Currie statement any time now:

"Well, we called the NCAA to see if it was an issue, but they never called us back! You should totally be mad at them, not us"

Kat Kid · « **Reply #118 on:** March 17, 2012, 04:59:03 PM »

Quote from: Paul Moscow on March 17, 2012, 04:57:15 PM

Doesn't help that Malone was just charged with assault three days ago.

This is relevant in what universe?

Paul Moscow · « **Reply #119 on:** March 17, 2012, 05:01:00 PM »

Quote from: Kat Kid on March 17, 2012, 04:59:03 PM

Quote from: Paul Moscow on March 17, 2012, 04:57:15 PM
Doesn't help that Malone was just charged with assault three days ago.

This is relevant in what universe?

The NCAA's attention universe

BEFR · « **Reply #120 on:** March 17, 2012, 05:01:13 PM »

Somebody set me straight.... So our ad and complience people error on the side of caution, presumably so their reps are intact and we can claim due diligence and institutional control should the Beasley allegations ever flare up? And jamars last college game is a casualty of currie legal posturing (assuming that snake Malone IS the issue). That would be a crying shame for jamsam to have been such an ill treated pawn in a larger game of greed and politics

EMAWesome · « **Reply #121 on:** March 17, 2012, 05:01:52 PM »

So, if we don't suspend him, and just for shits & giggles, lets say Jamar makes up a 16 point difference (LOL), and we beat 'Cuse...then this week, or next month, whenever it comes to light that Jamar DID have eligibility issues and we forfeit everything...you guys that hate Currie now would have his back then?

If it IS 'just' $200 from a family friend, I agree it looks bad, but it isn't like Currie is handed a dossier with 100% of the facts (i.e. he doesn't know if that $200 is a one time thing, or the only thing he knows about right now). He has to make a judgement call based on what he has, and he HAS to take Jamar's history of boneheaded decisions into account.

just sayin

kstater · « **Reply #122 on:** March 17, 2012, 05:03:33 PM »

A goddamn townie reported the money transfer.

http://kansasstate.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1344399

Cire · « **Reply #123 on:** March 17, 2012, 05:03:51 PM »

Someone saw this and reported it? Hope the power tard that did this rots in hell

michigancat · « **Reply #124 on:** March 17, 2012, 05:06:22 PM »

omfg. you motherfucking townies