Author Topic: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.  (Read 143600 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20997
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #400 on: March 18, 2012, 11:49:27 AM »
Why is it so hard for people to understand that Currie is really good at some of his responsibilities, but very bad at others?  Praise and criticism are not mutually exclusive.  And as far as the praise goes, maybe Currie can look to the apt compensation befitting an athletics director at Kansas State.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #401 on: March 18, 2012, 11:49:45 AM »
I really don't understand the hatred for ADJC.

i don't know the man personally, so i can only rely on those i trust who have a better feel for him.  both trim and frank martin dislike him, which is good enough for me.

he is better than what we've had in the past

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #402 on: March 18, 2012, 11:51:16 AM »
i don't know the man personally, so i can only rely on those i trust who have a better feel for him.  both trim and frank martin dislike him, which is good enough for me.

he is better than what we've had in the past
[/quote]

i don't think he's a bad a.d.  i just don't like him.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline _33

  • The Inventor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10540
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #403 on: March 18, 2012, 12:06:15 PM »
I really don't understand the hatred for ADJC.

i don't know the man personally, so i can only rely on those i trust who have a better feel for him.  both trim and frank martin dislike him, which is good enough for me.

he is better than what we've had in the past

Said the dumbass who hates Frank Martin.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55959
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #404 on: March 18, 2012, 12:08:29 PM »
It is dumb on Currie's part.  But's it's more arrogance.

He simply thinks he can have his cake and eat it too.  In his mind he believes he can pad his resume by boasting about winning programs AND claim a squeaky clean compliance track record. 

When you have two very high-profile compliance violations in two basketball seasons, how can you claim to have a squeaky clean compliance record?

The image of a vigilance to compliance is what it appears he's trying to uphold.



This seems like pretty piss-poor compliance. You have a player that has been on your watch for your entire tenure and he thinks it's OK to take $200 from an AAU coach? You haven't educated Jamar enough to at least get him to ask what to do about getting fed before he asked an AAU coach that is being sued by a former player for being an agent runner? On top of that, it took place in possibly the most public way imaginable. I'm sure University Presidents are super impressed by the way Currie got "AAU Coach", "cash", and "Kansas State University" in headlines across the country during possibly the highest-profile weekend of the NCAA calendar.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #405 on: March 18, 2012, 12:10:17 PM »
Frank's comments are what upsets me most.  He felt his kid was betrayed.  If Frank had come out and said "Jamar made a big mistake, we still love him, but he had to sit", I'd feel differently.

Offline EMAWmeister

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 8957
  • Livin' it up
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #406 on: March 18, 2012, 12:12:26 PM »
JFC, that scout board really is the dumbest place on earth.

Quote
I believe in mis-information as well as the next guy.  But KSU is one of the leading Land Grant Universities in the world.  If a KSU student is hungry, he/she can walk over to Grain Science and they can snarf down all the bread crumbs they want out of the baking labs.

I do not think Jamar needed money for FOOD.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #407 on: March 18, 2012, 12:13:28 PM »
I really don't understand the hatred for ADJC.

i don't know the man personally, so i can only rely on those i trust who have a better feel for him.  both trim and frank martin dislike him, which is good enough for me.

he is better than what we've had in the past

Said the dumbass who hates Frank Martin.

good point (that frank is also better than what we've had in the past)

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20997
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #408 on: March 18, 2012, 12:20:25 PM »
JFC, that scout board really is the dumbest place on earth.

Quote
I believe in mis-information as well as the next guy.  But KSU is one of the leading Land Grant Universities in the world.  If a KSU student is hungry, he/she can walk over to Grain Science and they can snarf down all the bread crumbs they want out of the baking labs.

I do not think Jamar needed money for FOOD.

Are we close to having an argument over whether or not Jamar should be on food stamps?

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #409 on: March 18, 2012, 12:20:51 PM »
this would never have happened in football.  never.

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22786
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #410 on: March 18, 2012, 12:23:31 PM »
this would never have happened in football.  never.
Eh.  Broderick may disagree.  OTOH, Ell Roberson played the entire Fiesta Bowl.

It wouldn't have been done like this though, that's for certain.


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline EMAWmeister

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 8957
  • Livin' it up
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #411 on: March 18, 2012, 12:25:53 PM »
JFC, that scout board really is the dumbest place on earth.

Quote
I believe in mis-information as well as the next guy.  But KSU is one of the leading Land Grant Universities in the world.  If a KSU student is hungry, he/she can walk over to Grain Science and they can snarf down all the bread crumbs they want out of the baking labs.

I do not think Jamar needed money for FOOD.

Are we close to having an argument over whether or not Jamar should be on food stamps?

No, but they are basically saying "well those blacks spend all that pell grant money on tattoos and jordan bball shoes!  :shakesfist:".

Just rough ridin' embarassing.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55959
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #412 on: March 18, 2012, 12:33:41 PM »
It wouldn't have been done like this though, that's for certain.


How can you be certain of that?

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #413 on: March 18, 2012, 12:36:46 PM »
It wouldn't have been done like this though, that's for certain.


How can you be certain of that?

I have a hard time believing that if Snyder thought the kid should play and Currie didn't, that Currie would win. 

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17834
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #414 on: March 18, 2012, 12:39:39 PM »
It is dumb on Currie's part.  But's it's more arrogance.

He simply thinks he can have his cake and eat it too.  In his mind he believes he can pad his resume by boasting about winning programs AND claim a squeaky clean compliance track record. 

When you have two very high-profile compliance violations in two basketball seasons, how can you claim to have a squeaky clean compliance record?

Currie blames the issue on someone else, and claims he's the good guy by reporting it.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32514
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #415 on: March 18, 2012, 12:41:11 PM »
Is it unreasonable to expect clarification from the A.D on the matter?  If transparency is the end game then why would a thorough explanation of the circumstances and thought process that led to the decision be withheld.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55959
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #416 on: March 18, 2012, 12:42:26 PM »
It wouldn't have been done like this though, that's for certain.


How can you be certain of that?

I have a hard time believing that if Snyder thought the kid should play and Currie didn't, that Currie would win.


And you think Frank would go down with less of a fight?

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #417 on: March 18, 2012, 12:44:15 PM »
this would never have happened in football.  never.
Eh.  Broderick may disagree.  OTOH, Ell Roberson played the entire Fiesta Bowl.

It wouldn't have been done like this though, that's for certain.

comparing jamar samuels to ell roberson, good grief.  ell roberson was 100 times more important to the success of his team than jamar.

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20997
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #418 on: March 18, 2012, 12:58:22 PM »
Is it unreasonable to expect clarification from the A.D on the matter?  If transparency is the end game then why would a thorough explanation of the circumstances and thought process that led to the decision be withheld.

You would think.

Offline bigDcat

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 442
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #419 on: March 18, 2012, 01:03:29 PM »
Is it unreasonable to expect clarification from the A.D on the matter?  If transparency is the end game then why would a thorough explanation of the circumstances and thought process that led to the decision be withheld.

You would think.

This has become a national story with people making fair or unfair accusations against our University, yet our Athletic Department remains silent. It really pisses me off.

Offline Rams

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3384
  • Worst poster on this board by far
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #420 on: March 18, 2012, 01:09:46 PM »
This is apples to oranges.  Roberson didn't violate any NCAA rules, dumbasses.  He broke curfew and sexed a girl up.  His punishment, or lack thereof, was entirely at the discretion of the head coach.
"Son. This is why we are wildcats. Hard work, pride, the heart of this country. And if that's not enough for you, you can just move to California with your punk friends."

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #421 on: March 18, 2012, 01:13:07 PM »
Is it unreasonable to expect clarification from the A.D on the matter?  If transparency is the end game then why would a thorough explanation of the circumstances and thought process that led to the decision be withheld.

You would think.

This has become a national story with people making fair or unfair accusations against our University, yet our Athletic Department remains silent. It really pisses me off.

lol, no one cares about this story.

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22786
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #422 on: March 18, 2012, 01:14:26 PM »
It wouldn't have been done like this though, that's for certain.


How can you be certain of that?

I have a hard time believing that if Snyder thought the kid should play and Currie didn't, that Currie would win.


And you think Frank would go down with less of a fight?
Not at all, I just think Snyder has more clout within the Athletic Department.  I don't think Currie is capable of bullying around Snyder like it seems he did with Frank.

Do you disagree?


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline j-dub

  • fattyfest dance champion '14
  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 4782
  • "I wanna get hurt!"
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #423 on: March 18, 2012, 01:18:19 PM »
It wouldn't have been done like this though, that's for certain.


How can you be certain of that?

I have a hard time believing that if Snyder thought the kid should play and Currie didn't, that Currie would win.


And you think Frank would go down with less of a fight?
Not at all, I just think Snyder has more clout within the Athletic Department.  I don't think Currie is capable of bullying around Snyder like it seems he did with Frank.

Do you disagree?

not at all dlew. not at all. and i imagine it really grates on frank.
"I started calling him John during the game, cause he was rocking it like No. 7 -- like Elway," Harper said."

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30948
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #424 on: March 18, 2012, 01:21:27 PM »
It is dumb on Currie's part.  But's it's more arrogance.

He simply thinks he can have his cake and eat it too.  In his mind he believes he can pad his resume by boasting about winning programs AND claim a squeaky clean compliance track record. 

When you have two very high-profile compliance violations in two basketball seasons, how can you claim to have a squeaky clean compliance record?

They were before he got there and he didn't hire the coach with the "issues?" :dunno: