Author Topic: The Battle for 5th  (Read 14746 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

catzacker

  • Guest
The Battle for 5th
« on: February 04, 2012, 08:46:48 PM »
Why settle for 2nd, when 5th is available?

KSU  5-5
UT    4-6
OSU 4-6

Pretty similar schedules here on out.


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline Stupid Fitz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6955
  • Go Cats
    • View Profile
Re: The Battle for 5th
« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2012, 08:51:36 PM »
Better than most people thought :dunno:

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32571
    • View Profile
Re: The Battle for 5th
« Reply #2 on: February 04, 2012, 09:00:05 PM »
5th place WOULD TAKE
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Battle for 5th
« Reply #3 on: February 04, 2012, 09:00:35 PM »
The loss in Ames was a killer.

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: The Battle for 5th
« Reply #4 on: February 04, 2012, 09:01:43 PM »
Better than most people thought :dunno:

I think we were picked 6th. And I mean, I guess if we want to suck each other off for finishing 5th then great.  

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Battle for 5th
« Reply #5 on: February 04, 2012, 09:02:49 PM »
I mean, I guess if we want to suck each other off for finishing 5th then great.  

my guess is that you are opting out.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: The Battle for 5th
« Reply #6 on: February 04, 2012, 09:04:51 PM »
The loss in Ames was a killer.

....and home loss to OU...and home loss to baylor.  Win those and we would be a legitimate threat to take our rightful place as 4th best.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55979
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: The Battle for 5th
« Reply #7 on: February 04, 2012, 10:24:19 PM »
you know what? I think we can do it. :driving:

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: The Battle for 5th
« Reply #8 on: February 04, 2012, 10:37:56 PM »
The loss in Ames was a killer.

Yeah.  It's going to be hard to make up two games with @UT, KU, @MU and @Baylor.  ISU has us on the road and Baylor twice.  I don't know.  Maybe there is something to Frank's 21-3 February record that will propel us to another Top 4 finish.


catzacker

  • Guest
Re: The Battle for 5th
« Reply #9 on: February 04, 2012, 11:04:55 PM »
you know what? I think we can do it. :driving:

KSU : TT, @ UT, KU, @ BU, @ MU, ISU, @A&M, OSU
UT    : @ A&M, KSU, @ OU, @ OSU, BU, @ TT, @ KU
OSU : ISU, @KU, @MU, UT, @ OU, A&M, KU, @ KSU

OSU prolly has the toughest road. we pissed away any shot at top 4 last week.

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: The Battle for 5th
« Reply #10 on: February 04, 2012, 11:10:19 PM »
you know what? I think we can do it. :driving:

KSU : TT, @ UT, KU, @ BU, @ MU, ISU, @A&M, OSU
UT    : @ A&M, KSU, @ OU, @ OSU, BU, @ TT, @ KU
OSU : ISU, @KU, @MU, UT, @ OU, A&M, KU, @ KSU

OSU prolly has the toughest road. we pissed away any shot at top 4 last week.

You can't say "any" shot.  You can say "best shot", but not "any".

We had some bad luck.  I'm going to just sit back and let February happen.  It's worked out well in the past.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Battle for 5th
« Reply #11 on: February 04, 2012, 11:10:43 PM »
we pissed away any shot at top 4 last week.

kstate's only 2 back from isu in the loss column, zacker.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: The Battle for 5th
« Reply #12 on: February 04, 2012, 11:16:59 PM »
we pissed away any shot at top 4 last week.

kstate's only 2 back from isu in the loss column, zacker.

..but a mile back in my heart.

ISU does have some losses left on their schedule, but if we had won the last two games (or really just the ISU game and then one of BU and OU/@OU) then we'd have 4th locked up, with an outside shot at 2.
« Last Edit: February 04, 2012, 11:19:32 PM by catzacker »

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Battle for 5th
« Reply #13 on: February 04, 2012, 11:24:14 PM »
Jfc ppl. 4th is where we'll be. Stop being respects. Half the league is good, half the lead is bad. Math for dummies.

Offline fatty fat fat

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3020
    • View Profile
Re: The Battle for 5th
« Reply #14 on: February 04, 2012, 11:27:25 PM »
whatever. 5th place sucks.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55979
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: The Battle for 5th
« Reply #15 on: February 04, 2012, 11:48:08 PM »
If we hadn't lost any games we would be in sole possession of first.

Offline fatty fat fat

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3020
    • View Profile
Re: The Battle for 5th
« Reply #16 on: February 04, 2012, 11:50:27 PM »
4th place guarnetee ncaa. 5th place would kind of be a step back, but there is still lots of season to play

regardless, a home W over KU...and the season is a success no matter

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45943
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: The Battle for 5th
« Reply #17 on: February 05, 2012, 12:08:37 AM »
we pissed away any shot at top 4 last week.

kstate's only 2 back from isu in the loss column, zacker.

Should I be surprised and or disappointed you got sucked into this stupid pity party?  Isn't the fact that this thread wasn't started on Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, or even Saturday morning an obvious indicator of what this thread was intended to be?

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Battle for 5th
« Reply #18 on: February 05, 2012, 12:11:02 AM »
Should I be surprised and or disappointed you got sucked into this stupid pity party?  Isn't the fact that this thread wasn't started on Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, or even Saturday morning an obvious indicator of what this thread was intended to be?

i dunno?  if you mean that cz is trying to deflect any positivity from today's win, then well yeah, that's what he does.  we all still like him though.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: The Battle for 5th
« Reply #19 on: February 05, 2012, 09:26:58 AM »
we pissed away any shot at top 4 last week.

kstate's only 2 back from isu in the loss column, zacker.

Should I be surprised and or disappointed you got sucked into this stupid pity party?  Isn't the fact that this thread wasn't started on Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, or even Saturday morning an obvious indicator of what this thread was intended to be?

sure, the undertone was one of disapointment, but the post seemed kinda relevant given the isu win, osu loss and ksu win.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45943
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: The Battle for 5th
« Reply #20 on: February 05, 2012, 10:03:41 AM »
we pissed away any shot at top 4 last week.

kstate's only 2 back from isu in the loss column, zacker.

Should I be surprised and or disappointed you got sucked into this stupid pity party?  Isn't the fact that this thread wasn't started on Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, or even Saturday morning an obvious indicator of what this thread was intended to be?

sure, the undertone was one of disapointment, but the post seemed kinda relevant given the isu win, osu loss and ksu win.

The thing is you don't actually believe there is a battle for 5th.  I know you're a cynical bastard, but you're smart enough to not let cynicism to override good sense.

Offline CyberToothCat

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 673
    • View Profile
Re: The Battle for 5th
« Reply #21 on: February 05, 2012, 10:15:44 AM »
Why settle for 2nd, when 5th is available?

KSU  5-5
UT    4-6
OSU 4-6

Pretty similar schedules here on out.

4th place no longer matters.

In the Big 12 tourney:
#1 will play the winner of #7/10
#2 will play the winner of #8/9
#3 will play #6
#4 will play #5

#1, #2, #3, #4, #5 and #6 all get a bye.

Other than being able to say "Yay, we were 4th!", there is no difference between 4th and 5th place anymore.

Offline EMAW4life-JHL

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 744
  • Morgan Freeman's childhood friend/worst poster
    • View Profile
Re: The Battle for 5th
« Reply #22 on: February 05, 2012, 11:07:05 AM »
we will finish third
Go Home Dad you're drunk

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18083
    • View Profile
Re: The Battle for 5th
« Reply #23 on: February 05, 2012, 11:14:40 AM »
Why settle for 2nd, when 5th is available?

KSU  5-5
UT    4-6
OSU 4-6

Pretty similar schedules here on out.

4th place no longer matters.

In the Big 12 tourney:
#1 will play the winner of #7/10
#2 will play the winner of #8/9
#3 will play #6
#4 will play #5

#1, #2, #3, #4, #5 and #6 all get a bye.

Other than being able to say "Yay, we were 4th!", there is no difference between 4th and 5th place anymore.

I am almost certain it makes a difference to selection committee.  The season doesn't end with the Big12 tourney

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Battle for 5th
« Reply #24 on: February 05, 2012, 11:32:23 AM »
Why settle for 2nd, when 5th is available?

KSU  5-5
UT    4-6
OSU 4-6

Pretty similar schedules here on out.

4th place no longer matters.

In the Big 12 tourney:
#1 will play the winner of #7/10
#2 will play the winner of #8/9
#3 will play #6
#4 will play #5

#1, #2, #3, #4, #5 and #6 all get a bye.

Other than being able to say "Yay, we were 4th!", there is no difference between 4th and 5th place anymore.

I am almost certain it makes a difference to selection committee.  The season doesn't end with the Big12 tourney

In all likelyhood we'll play ISU again and (hopefully) have a chance at beating them a 2nd time in 3 tries.