Author Topic: Our NIT seed?  (Read 25790 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59550
    • View Profile
Re: Our NIT seed?
« Reply #25 on: November 11, 2011, 08:02:51 PM »
Shane Southwell isn't good.

« Last Edit: November 12, 2011, 07:27:13 AM by sonofdaxjones »

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Our NIT seed?
« Reply #26 on: November 11, 2011, 08:03:00 PM »
which of the following lines of reasoning is the one that is so concerning to you combotards?

1.  kstate's zone offense looks like crap, therefore it will look like crap all year.
2.  kstate is missing good shots, therefore they'll miss good shots all year.
3.  kstate's defense looks like crap, therefore it'll be crap all year.


"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: Our NIT seed?
« Reply #27 on: November 11, 2011, 08:03:38 PM »
11.  LMFAO.  Down 8 to up 11.  

Offline AppleJack

  • AppleJack
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6338
  • How are you doing today?
    • View Profile
Re: Our NIT seed?
« Reply #28 on: November 11, 2011, 08:04:00 PM »
which of the following lines of reasoning is the one that is so concerning to you combotards?

1.  kstate's zone offense looks like crap, therefore it will look like crap all year.
2.  kstate is missing good shots, therefore they'll miss good shots all year.
3.  kstate's defense looks like crap, therefore it'll be crap all year.




2
When one person, for whatever reason, has a chance to lead an exceptional life, he has no right to keep it to himself.

Offline kstater

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2325
    • View Profile
Re: Our NIT seed?
« Reply #29 on: November 11, 2011, 08:04:41 PM »
which of the following lines of reasoning is the one that is so concerning to you combotards?

1.  kstate's zone offense looks like crap, therefore it will look like crap all year.
2.  kstate is missing good shots, therefore they'll miss good shots all year.
3.  kstate's defense looks like crap, therefore it'll be crap all year.




4. The talent is crap, so the talent will be crap all year.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59550
    • View Profile
Re: Our NIT seed?
« Reply #30 on: November 11, 2011, 08:05:10 PM »
Down 13 sys.

Team looks like crap, but hey, Frank likes this team.

« Last Edit: November 12, 2011, 07:27:43 AM by sonofdaxjones »

Offline kstater

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2325
    • View Profile
Re: Our NIT seed?
« Reply #31 on: November 11, 2011, 08:06:38 PM »
:lol:

Offline Pendergast

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1494
    • View Profile
Re: Our NIT seed?
« Reply #32 on: November 11, 2011, 08:07:22 PM »
which of the following lines of reasoning is the one that is so concerning to you combotards?

1.  kstate's zone offense looks like crap, therefore it will look like crap all year.
2.  kstate is missing good shots, therefore they'll miss good shots all year.
3.  kstate's defense looks like crap, therefore it'll be crap all year.




 :lol:

We suck ass.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Our NIT seed?
« Reply #33 on: November 11, 2011, 08:07:41 PM »
Down 13 sys.

Team looks like complete ass, but hey, Frank likes this team.

what martin team hasn't looked like complete ass in november?
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32514
    • View Profile
Re: Our NIT seed?
« Reply #34 on: November 11, 2011, 08:08:13 PM »
Pretty sure frank put that first half together just to eff with stan at half.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59550
    • View Profile
Re: Our NIT seed?
« Reply #35 on: November 11, 2011, 08:09:11 PM »
You're a great b-ball tuck sys . . . I'll give you that.

I guess when you can't recruit, you have to mold.


Offline GoodForAnother

  • It was all a scheme I used to read emaw magazine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6045
  • You hate to see this Mike
    • View Profile
Re: Our NIT seed?
« Reply #36 on: November 11, 2011, 08:11:01 PM »
one of these novembers, the resident dumbasses are going to realize that they bitch about frank...every november
emaw

Offline slimz

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Katpak'r
  • *******
  • Posts: 2128
    • View Profile
Re: Our NIT seed?
« Reply #37 on: November 11, 2011, 08:11:25 PM »
Parody thread?

 :sdeek:

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: Our NIT seed?
« Reply #38 on: November 11, 2011, 08:12:04 PM »
ya know what is so concerning sis?  the fact that the f*cking players making the f*cking mistakes aren't the "new" guys, they aren't the freshman...they are the guys that have been here for 2,3 years.  that's what's f*cking concerning.  the fact that this is year f*cking 5 and the SAME F*CKING SH*T HAPPENS EVERY GODDAMN YEAR.  Why is it so goddman hard to play defense?  why?  how f*cking hard is it to play your second goddman game of the f*cking year hard and not lazily walk down the goddman court while some scrub from charlseton f*cking southern drops a 3 ball in your ugly face?  why?  why does this stupid sh*t have to happen in order for frank to coach?  why can't he just coach from the start of the season?  why does it take this bullsh*t every goddamn year.  why? that's what's f*cking concerning.  

oh, and what's most concerning is the average star ranking we trot out on the court.  

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: Our NIT seed?
« Reply #39 on: November 11, 2011, 08:12:24 PM »
Down 13 sys.

Team looks like complete ass, but hey, Frank likes this team.

what martin team hasn't looked like complete ass in november?

This.  The defense can't stay this sloppy.  The shots can't be this off.  

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59550
    • View Profile
Re: Our NIT seed?
« Reply #40 on: November 11, 2011, 08:14:31 PM »
I just want to know who on here decided that Shane Southwell was good.

Shane . . . enjoy your last year at K-State.

2012 . . . "We're a young team ya know".


Offline GoodForAnother

  • It was all a scheme I used to read emaw magazine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6045
  • You hate to see this Mike
    • View Profile
Re: Our NIT seed?
« Reply #41 on: November 11, 2011, 08:16:58 PM »
the fact that this is year f*cking 5 and the SAME F*CKING SH*T HAPPENS EVERY GODDAMN YEAR.

we also win 20 games and finish in the top 4 in the big 12 every year
emaw

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Our NIT seed?
« Reply #42 on: November 11, 2011, 08:17:42 PM »
ya know what is so concerning sis?  the fact that the f*cking players making the f*cking mistakes aren't the "new" guys, they aren't the freshman...they are the guys that have been here for 2,3 years.  that's what's f*cking concerning.  

why is it so concerning?  4 years, 3 tourneys.  they've sucked every year at the start.  sucking in november doesn't appear to be a great harbinger of doom.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline pike

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5138
  • BIG GREEN EGG!!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Our NIT seed?
« Reply #43 on: November 11, 2011, 08:18:29 PM »
I don't want to lose  :bawl:

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: Our NIT seed?
« Reply #44 on: November 11, 2011, 08:18:58 PM »
we're down 14 to charleston southern.  i mean 14.  At home.  If you assholes want to bury your head in the sand and hope that somehow this untalented team finishes above .500, so be it.  This is awful basketball. Awful.  Done with this team.  

Offline Pendergast

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1494
    • View Profile
Re: Our NIT seed?
« Reply #45 on: November 11, 2011, 08:19:36 PM »
the fact that this is year f*cking 5 and the SAME F*CKING SH*T HAPPENS EVERY GODDAMN YEAR.

we also win 20 games and finish in the top 4 in the big 12 every year

Which was a disappointment last year.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88576
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Our NIT seed?
« Reply #46 on: November 11, 2011, 08:19:46 PM »
oh, hey, ku is doing good against awful teams while kstate isn't   :rolleyes:

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88576
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Our NIT seed?
« Reply #47 on: November 11, 2011, 08:20:51 PM »
we're down 14 to charleston southern.  i mean 14.  At home.  If you assholes want to bury your head in the sand and hope that somehow this untalented team finishes above .500, so be it.  This is awful basketball. Awful.  Done with this team.  

what are the odds you posted this exact same thing in this exact same point in the season each of the last 5 years?  100%?  

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: Our NIT seed?
« Reply #48 on: November 11, 2011, 08:21:04 PM »
we're down 14 to charleston southern.  i mean 14.  At home.  If you assholes want to bury your head in the sand and hope that somehow this untalented team finishes above .500, so be it.  This is awful basketball. Awful.  Done with this team.  

wow.  1 half and he's out.  no jumping back in when we're up 19 at home over Mizzou and sweeping Texas

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: Our NIT seed?
« Reply #49 on: November 11, 2011, 08:22:02 PM »
ya know what is so concerning sis?  the fact that the f*cking players making the f*cking mistakes aren't the "new" guys, they aren't the freshman...they are the guys that have been here for 2,3 years.  that's what's f*cking concerning.  

why is it so concerning?  4 years, 3 tourneys.  they've sucked every year at the start.  sucking in november doesn't appear to be a great harbinger of doom.

this is an entirely new level.  entirely new.  this is bad, bad basketball.  i mean, i expected it to be not good, but this is garbage.  The experienced guys are just awful.  And it isn't like we can look back and go "hey, martavious will get better" or "hey, victor always starts slow" or "jordan is usually more consistent than this"....because they aren't.  They were all role players, sans McGruds, and they just look awful.  And then there's the new guys who look like new guys.  Sure, first game and all that....but my f'ing god, this is horrible.  I'm not even joking.  This isn't a parody.  This is awful.