Author Topic: Our NIT seed? (Read 25763 times)

steve dave · « **Reply #50 on:** November 11, 2011, 08:22:42 PM »

I absolutely adore catzacker in an almost sexual sense and we very well may end up 6th-9th in the B12 this season but it's not time to melt down yet.

GoodForAnother · « **Reply #51 on:** November 11, 2011, 08:23:00 PM »

Quote from: catzacker on November 11, 2011, 08:18:58 PM

we're down 14 to charleston southern. i mean 14. At home. If you assholes want to bury your head in the sand and hope that somehow this untalented team finishes above .500, so be it. This is awful basketball. Awful. Done with this team.

I think it's more rational to assume this season will follow the same pattern as all of frank's teams than it is to abandon the team 20 minutes into the season

catzacker · « **Reply #52 on:** November 11, 2011, 08:23:04 PM »

Quote from: steve dave on November 11, 2011, 08:20:51 PM

Quote from: catzacker on November 11, 2011, 08:18:58 PM
we're down 14 to charleston southern. i mean 14. At home. If you assholes want to bury your head in the sand and hope that somehow this untalented team finishes above .500, so be it. This is awful basketball. Awful. Done with this team.

what are the odds you posted this exact same thing in this exact same point in the season each of the last 5 years? 100%?

I waited. We made it to about the Xavier game beasley's year, about the iowa game sans beasley, fort hays state the elite 8 run, and illinois chicago last year. This is awful.

Pendergast · « **Reply #53 on:** November 11, 2011, 08:23:22 PM »

Quote from: steve dave on November 11, 2011, 08:20:51 PM

Quote from: catzacker on November 11, 2011, 08:18:58 PM
we're down 14 to charleston southern. i mean 14. At home. If you assholes want to bury your head in the sand and hope that somehow this untalented team finishes above .500, so be it. This is awful basketball. Awful. Done with this team.

what are the odds you posted this exact same thing in this exact same point in the season each of the last 5 years? 100%?

When were we down by 14 at home to a directional school in November? If you can't see that this is a different animal than years past, I don't know what say.

steve dave · « **Reply #54 on:** November 11, 2011, 08:24:11 PM »

Quote from: catzacker on November 11, 2011, 08:23:04 PM

Quote from: steve dave on November 11, 2011, 08:20:51 PM
Quote from: catzacker on November 11, 2011, 08:18:58 PM
we're down 14 to charleston southern. i mean 14. At home. If you assholes want to bury your head in the sand and hope that somehow this untalented team finishes above .500, so be it. This is awful basketball. Awful. Done with this team.

what are the odds you posted this exact same thing in this exact same point in the season each of the last 5 years? 100%?

I waited. We made it to about the Xavier game beasley's year, about the iowa game sans beasley, fort hays state the elite 8 run, and illinois chicago last year. This is awful.

yeah, you/ksu may be a bit early this year. I stand corrected.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #55 on:** November 11, 2011, 08:24:27 PM »

It's what the Frankites like . . . bad November, decent at stretches during the conference season, a 4th place finish, a 2nd round NCAA game.

Pay Frank.

catzacker · « **Reply #56 on:** November 11, 2011, 08:24:49 PM »

and let's be clear, I don't give a damn is they somehow make a game of this or pull this one out. It won't change my thoughts. This team sucks.

sys · « **Reply #57 on:** November 11, 2011, 08:25:09 PM »

Quote from: pike on November 11, 2011, 08:18:29 PM

I don't want to lose

yeah, me neither.

sys · « **Reply #58 on:** November 11, 2011, 08:26:25 PM »

Quote from: catzacker on November 11, 2011, 08:22:02 PM

this is an entirely new level. entirely new. this is bad, bad basketball. i mean, i expected it to be not good, but this is garbage.

you're blocking out games from previous years. this isn't even top 5 bad for the martin era.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #59 on:** November 11, 2011, 08:26:49 PM »

slothfense has made its way over to basketball.

K-State major sports: We don't need athletes, we "coach'em up".

catzacker · « **Reply #60 on:** November 11, 2011, 08:27:17 PM »

Quote from: sys on November 11, 2011, 08:26:25 PM

Quote from: catzacker on November 11, 2011, 08:22:02 PM
this is an entirely new level. entirely new. this is bad, bad basketball. i mean, i expected it to be not good, but this is garbage.

you're blocking out games from previous years. this isn't even top 5 bad for the martin era.

are you serious? we're going to get run by charleston southern. Run.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #61 on:** November 11, 2011, 08:27:32 PM »

sys please list worse, so I can laugh.

catzacker · « **Reply #62 on:** November 11, 2011, 08:28:10 PM »

i mean, who's going to lead this team back? Rodney? Will? gmafb.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #63 on:** November 11, 2011, 08:29:04 PM »

We look like we run in sand.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #64 on:** November 11, 2011, 08:30:22 PM »

Even when Southwell is good, he looks bad.

steve dave · « **Reply #65 on:** November 11, 2011, 08:30:47 PM »

He looks amazing

sys · « **Reply #66 on:** November 11, 2011, 08:32:00 PM »

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on November 11, 2011, 08:27:32 PM

sys please list worse, so I can laugh.

i'll need to look at schedules & wait to see how bad/not bad the 2nd half is. give me 30 minutes after the game ends.

steve dave · « **Reply #67 on:** November 11, 2011, 08:33:47 PM »

Joe Diffie looks like he's enjoying the game

edit: and supporting the troops

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #68 on:** November 11, 2011, 08:34:21 PM »

They're way more explosive, and much quicker.

Barry McCockner · « **Reply #69 on:** November 11, 2011, 08:34:36 PM »

More entertaining following this loss....Frank's postgame or this board? Glad I don't have to choose just one.

AbeFroman · « **Reply #70 on:** November 11, 2011, 08:35:15 PM »

There are shitty november teams and then there is down 14 at the half. So yeah this is rough ridin' bullshit. I hate everyone except JO

steve dave · « **Reply #71 on:** November 11, 2011, 08:36:25 PM »

Quote from: catzacker on November 11, 2011, 08:28:10 PM

i mean, who's going to lead this team back? Rodney? Will? gmafb.

I choose rodney

pike · « **Reply #72 on:** November 11, 2011, 08:36:37 PM »

0.42 · « **Reply #73 on:** November 11, 2011, 08:37:11 PM »

Nothing beats a tandem dax-'zacker meltdown. Absolutely nothing.

Cartierfor3 · « **Reply #74 on:** November 11, 2011, 08:37:29 PM »

Quote from: catzacker on November 11, 2011, 08:28:10 PM

i mean, who's going to lead this team back? Rodney? Will? gmafb.

probably Rodney