165-22

[Cire]

wow

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

His premise is Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!). 

[mcmwcat]

that's pretty good.

[OregonSmock]

i'm pretty sure we sniffed one when we went to the elite eight two years ago. 

I didn't realize getting to an Elite Eight = Final Four. 

just sniffin

I'll give you this one, my friend.  You may have won the battle, but not the war.


 

[sonofdaxjones]

Look at the Validation Express pickin up steam again.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Look at the Validation Express pickin up steam again.

It's amazing what a steller performance against Fort Hays will do for their confidence.  I was anticipating this after the Pittsburg game, but that was such an underwhelming performance, I guess they had to wait.

[SdK]

No other program in the history of college basketball has more wins in a five year stretch.  We are the bluest of the blue bloods.  That is all. 

Denied!

Not even the best stretch of college basketball in the last 5 years. (UCONN women 182-8 in the last 5 years.)

Not even the best individual NCAA mens Div I coaching effort in the last 5 years:
John Calipari was 172-17 from 2005-2010 and 168-22 from 2006-2011 (Memphis & Kentucky)

Definately not the best 5 year winning percentage ever.
Duke went 164-19 or 89.6% from 1997-2002.
UCLA went 335-22 from 1963-1975  (Wooden lost 22 games in 12 years 93.8%, only took self 5 years to lose 22 games 88.2%)
Kentucky went 241-20 from 1945-1953. (92.3% over 8 years)

It did help KU to average more than 37 games played per season. The NCAA champions for many years averaged less than 30 total games per season.

Not really the bluest of the blue bloods, just a very good team that got to play CU, NU, and ISU a minimum of 6 games per year!

1.  We're talking men's college basketball.

2.  We're talking programs, not coaches.

3.  We're talking wins, not winning percentage.


Anything else? 

Are you rough ridin' kidding me?  I know you're not. Yes, you guys have the most wins in 5 years because teams are playing more games. But Jesus Christ, how do you discount numbers that kick the piss out yours for not fitting in your conveniently constructed 5 year span? Idiocy.